From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0353C433E2 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 11:56:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80A092151B for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 11:56:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Qdk9Cecb"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="WuZTi+yn" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 80A092151B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=eKmQ9Vx+AX6TLEYrQB/f8I6bnSt6heGd8pwYqBp1iSo=; b=Qdk9CecbA9wBKH54aK6B4INLk 2wPD1v2Lf6Mzwy0jJibu4R3NMi22/wehVAycmdcVyXV4ZImlJQIUgsS2ohO6zD5MaLCq6rhFo0mtv SKZmDvUmmk1dBMWBterOpQNqG/sOYp583lFJNqKqGo1WLDfwYIOSMDvEic3+j4AG98RkyDFgW225A fbA50fzqESW1NPvpZXlxAmINch9KwU21my7bq6qrvJRp+1tPSU80PMQrNMFjmAIwXohKNuhpjGUCY G38hmM+5oT3nJqm9Z9OA2ceIkDiTLKMquuS3HVn8Jcy7oa3CZPl+0UaxVa5U99isNfp7WZH5uQcBn mJLobpmGA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kEAJR-0003X5-Jk; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 11:55:25 +0000 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kEAJP-0003Wg-DG for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 11:55:24 +0000 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 084BtKwG081282; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 06:55:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1599220520; bh=8A/CI29+3++7WCMzfiZKo1l9Zv+CBCcHO9tXvKi9M/w=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=WuZTi+yn2HRPIYCxRpr2dS2BnwLOiSg0xrEGr6MB+r2e9p9ecjkIxBWrIV0OcSal2 BhjkqzfzcmFuQr3t2eHQdjWryx6zcmuGkJmPjmHi2bjm9CH8JGHrwAULcMkJMPjSlV m4oq1u40WAsUCIZFxHYkaiq+3yE2cpZ2TLiRrWdA= Received: from DFLE111.ent.ti.com (dfle111.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.32]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 084BtJfM100552 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 4 Sep 2020 06:55:20 -0500 Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) by DFLE111.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 06:55:19 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 06:55:19 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 084BtJom066987; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 06:55:19 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 06:55:19 -0500 From: Nishanth Menon To: Lokesh Vutla Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Convert K3 board/soc bindings to DT schema Message-ID: <20200904115519.mawa7lev37c6rgza@akan> References: <20200827065144.17683-1-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200827065144.17683-2-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200828004105.givypeu3vextefc6@akan> <1c9508ce-9336-e20a-5b58-5dd257247273@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1c9508ce-9336-e20a-5b58-5dd257247273@ti.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200904_075523_566688_10D2DEA2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.34 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Device Tree Mailing List , Grygorii Strashko , Sekhar Nori , Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , Linux ARM Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 08:44-20200828, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > Hi Nishanth, > > On 28/08/20 6:11 am, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > On 12:21-20200827, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > >> Convert TI K3 Board/SoC bindings to DT schema format. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla > >> --- > >> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.txt | 26 ---------------- > >> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml | 31 +++++++++++++++++++ > >> MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > >> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > >> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.txt > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml > > > > > > Thanks for doing this, but I have a problem with dbs_check and dtbs > > W=2 build warnings on existing dts files that this exposes further.. > > IMHO, that should not block the conversion to yaml bindings. May I know the > problem you are seeing? > > > Do you mind pulling this patch out of this j7200 series ? I would > > rather us cleanup the warnings a bit as well, and deal with yaml > > conversion seperate from j7200 bindings? > I just wanted to follow up on this thread as well.. [1] attempts stage 1 of cleanup, and we can follow up cleanup in parallel. So if Rob acks the binding, we can carry on based on the window it fits in. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200903130015.21361-1-nm@ti.com/ -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel