From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
<rafael@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 6/6] docs: mm: numaperf.rst Add brief description for access class 1.
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 22:03:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200907140307.571932-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200907140307.571932-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Try to make minimal changes to the document which already describes
access class 0 in a generic fashion (including IO initiatiors that
are not CPUs).
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
---
Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst
index 4d69ef1de830..b89bb85eac75 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst
@@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ nodes' access characteristics share the same performance relative to other
linked initiator nodes. Each target within an initiator's access class,
though, do not necessarily perform the same as each other.
+The access class "1" is used to allow differentiation between initiators
+that are CPUs and hence suitable for generic task scheduling, and
+IO initiators such as GPUs and NICs. Unlike access class 0, only
+nodes containing CPUs are considered.
+
================
NUMA Performance
================
@@ -88,6 +93,9 @@ The latency attributes are provided in nanoseconds.
The values reported here correspond to the rated latency and bandwidth
for the platform.
+Access class 1, takes the same form, but only includes values for CPU to
+memory activity.
+
==========
NUMA Cache
==========
--
2.19.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-07 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-07 14:03 [PATCH v10 0/6] ACPI: Support Generic Initiator proximity domains Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-07 14:03 ` [PATCH v10 1/6] ACPI: Support Generic Initiator only domains Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-07 14:03 ` [PATCH v10 2/6] x86: Support Generic Initiator only proximity domains Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-23 16:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-09-25 11:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-25 16:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-09-07 14:03 ` [PATCH v10 3/6] ACPI: Let ACPI know we support Generic Initiator Affinity Structures Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-07 14:03 ` [PATCH v10 4/6] ACPI: HMAT: Fix handling of changes from ACPI 6.2 to ACPI 6.3 Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-07 14:03 ` [PATCH v10 5/6] node: Add access1 class to represent CPU to memory characteristics Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-07 14:03 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2020-09-18 12:17 ` [PATCH v10 0/6] ACPI: Support Generic Initiator proximity domains Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200907140307.571932-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.v.kelley@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).