From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <Peter.Maydell@arm.com>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: kvm: Introduce MTE VCPU feature
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:49:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200910114943.cedbzlqfcgxg7jqs@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a7e18af-84bd-cee3-d68f-e08f225fc166@arm.com>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 10:21:07AM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> > We either need a KVM cap or a new CPU feature probing interface to avoid
> > making userspace try features one at a time. It's too bad that VCPU_INIT
> > doesn't clear all offending features from the feature set when returning
> > EINVAL, because then userspace could create a scratch VCPU with everything
> > it supports in order to see what KVM also supports in one go.
>
> If Peter's TELL_ME_WHAT_YOU_HAVE idea works out then perhaps we don't need
> the cap? Or would it still be useful?
>
We wouldn't need it, but we don't _need_ it now either. It's not very
convenient to probe vcpu features with scratch vcpus, especially if we
must probe one at a time, but it works. The TELL_ME_WHAT_YOU_HAVE idea
will only fix the one at a time issue, but still require a vcpu fd. If
this feature becomes a VM feature then a cap or VM level API would help
reduce the userspace probing work.
Thanks,
drew
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-10 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-04 16:00 [PATCH v2 0/2] MTE support for KVM guest Steven Price
2020-09-04 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: kvm: Save/restore MTE registers Steven Price
2020-09-04 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: kvm: Introduce MTE VCPU feature Steven Price
2020-09-09 15:48 ` Andrew Jones
2020-09-09 15:53 ` Peter Maydell
2020-09-10 6:38 ` Andrew Jones
2020-09-10 10:01 ` Andrew Jones
2020-09-10 9:21 ` Steven Price
2020-09-10 11:49 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2020-09-07 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] MTE support for KVM guest Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-09 9:15 ` Steven Price
2020-09-09 15:25 ` Andrew Jones
2020-09-09 16:04 ` Steven Price
2020-09-10 6:29 ` Andrew Jones
2020-09-10 9:21 ` Steven Price
2020-09-10 13:56 ` Andrew Jones
2020-09-10 14:14 ` Steven Price
2020-09-10 1:45 ` Richard Henderson
2020-09-10 5:44 ` Andrew Jones
2020-09-10 13:27 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-10 13:39 ` Andrew Jones
2020-09-10 0:33 ` Richard Henderson
2020-09-10 10:24 ` Steven Price
2020-09-10 15:36 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200910114943.cedbzlqfcgxg7jqs@kamzik.brq.redhat.com \
--to=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=Peter.Maydell@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).