From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E53BC433E2 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:05:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F073020EDD for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:05:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="zQiFWjE6"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="ICF3TAyl" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F073020EDD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Owner; bh=M8fMTXhCtPEiwfv9j9lk67c0aOdYk+qMLU8ohRoOcWY=; b=zQiFWjE6jAawV+e4zSGcbQs9Yw xiVn6wgP2ebCqaiidzZ6uDirZigQ+MztoZf6ytoCeZ2SdP8t/7CjEEux/3zWvMgPVt7+RjSHhnE2e ULq/Kf1abOPtwr4Ke3a1t0q+xIUr2JJzFDJzK5Jfly5nFs83kYVBPF5mcvOy2LBwG3FIU8mjIrPKl uZOdUkYOtLPlPBQDntle9TCXOuu7dsPBo6yziYFwA8rTTEBFYNCIUcrEYQLJ6UaoD35eSlFxKa/fA B9KTJlmm/3brRfDPogoRwkRS0klgrckTivqCNuo2mN77Klrfh4fiZbnGLOR1iCfuGIWvnxoLdG5ag 0MR7fEwA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kHqxY-0008AQ-TT; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:04:04 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x341.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::341]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kHqxV-00089X-28 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:04:02 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x341.google.com with SMTP id s13so550197wmh.4 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:04:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=O0l1UfcfUc0KBl9837XH5tw5OCJv2/86eThbuj5ZSqo=; b=ICF3TAylQiyjXI2Z7P+4bS80fp4tXC4GA/U9W4//WskyOyXgEGJQpwk+fz2nUS40Tu P8ITROvX8xgmIcA4h1PoKJylxWUGkjYfFXNysdcmL+k/QScf3zWV65wlwVCB7Ttty1Nv Eb9VGmlX1oeHZXTU1yvX10+CLfW21FWTDFzH/ixewUNbuJV6vOeuyV5Ra5QdQGQQFxfk 8RhtlhMw7cPkb5hLrJSz1sDwtEV1NUh5gIzQqq89DnQHxbocklDqLAMKcRnWV1NTcnix YV9tKHrKFWKfigwXvBB3/DjMkqviKlykhzWgDm+9B9sjPWA9WC6JtyPXTqU+PvPo2Blm Ywzg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=O0l1UfcfUc0KBl9837XH5tw5OCJv2/86eThbuj5ZSqo=; b=hHd5sY2HxMgwzt1pYuXLEbrWxMSxcdpOPLPUKDMriSQHXXVc/6RgsvN6q0MirCjwv0 XBLwz3cDMcJlJM5PMzZtTYfYO4sI3wtdacD4eZqAWhxe0u3VNcwXagibyVaew1RnK25a 3xIveIuqSMIV4DdiE8VkKGbaj40BuzImQISjEo8g+Eh4jFTMD5qXH0KaHyu5+6+9LjmF o5HEnb/75PtL5ELpD92MYC17l+vuip4TDIcwds8sh/MCbK2mqpOqA7q32O22nRt2FAqW jS0akaba83p+Fc9amvnzw8yZ0VcJ1ubM7wxHObtl4bdeUtb+hnROocbPazDNtn0gGsFv Fq5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531S1W2PMXFmkWjxPkAxwvhZTbSlVIYBLRoxuFbAvIFS4XcHPJ2+ ywf1cjRzZC/M+rvB4fURMjYo/w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzCuF1cawRkEdsS6dlgWacizeK6sJIZvSJhIt9gtQCWPViBRDdJE1W0SfhUHyK9PatHGeX9og== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:23c9:: with SMTP id j192mr137475wmj.6.1600099439486; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:03:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apalos.home ([2a02:587:4615:c071:2e56:dcff:fe9a:8f06]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l8sm21331412wrx.22.2020.09.14.09.03.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:03:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Ilias Apalodimas To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2] arm64: bpf: Fix branch offset in JIT Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 19:03:55 +0300 Message-Id: <20200914160355.19179-1-ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200914_120401_129193_76D017E7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.56 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Song Liu , Zi Shen Lim , Alexei Starovoitov , Will Deacon , ardb@kernel.org, Jean-Philippe Brucker , Daniel Borkmann , naresh.kamboju@linaro.org, John Fastabend , Catalin Marinas , Jakub Kicinski , Andrii Nakryiko , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Yonghong Song , KP Singh , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Yauheni Kaliuta , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ilias Apalodimas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Jiri Olsa , Martin KaFai Lau Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Running the eBPF test_verifier leads to random errors looking like this: [ 6525.735488] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1 [ 6525.735502] Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP [ 6525.741609] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs libdes libarc4 dns_resolver fscache binfmt_misc nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce gf128mul efi_pstore sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce evdev efivars efivarfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs blake2b_generic xor xor_neon zstd_compress raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic ahci xhci_pci libahci xhci_hcd igb libata i2c_algo_bit nvme realtek usbcore nvme_core scsi_mod t10_pi netsec mdio_devres of_mdio gpio_keys fixed_phy libphy gpio_mb86s7x [ 6525.787760] CPU: 3 PID: 7881 Comm: test_verifier Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc1+ #47 [ 6525.796111] Hardware name: Socionext SynQuacer E-series DeveloperBox, BIOS build #1 Jun 6 2020 [ 6525.804812] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 6525.810390] pc : bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.815613] lr : bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.820832] sp : ffff8000130cbb80 [ 6525.824141] x29: ffff8000130cbbb0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.829451] x27: 000005ef6fcbf39b x26: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.834759] x25: ffff8000130cbb80 x24: ffff800011dc7038 [ 6525.840067] x23: ffff8000130cbd00 x22: ffff0008f624d080 [ 6525.845375] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: ffff800011dc7000 [ 6525.850682] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.855990] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.861298] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.866606] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 6525.871913] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff8000000a660c [ 6525.877220] x9 : ffff800010951810 x8 : ffff8000130cbc38 [ 6525.882528] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000009864cfa881 [ 6525.887836] x5 : 00ffffffffffffff x4 : 002880ba1a0b3e9f [ 6525.893144] x3 : 0000000000000018 x2 : ffff8000000a4374 [ 6525.898452] x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000009 [ 6525.903760] Call trace: [ 6525.906202] bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4 [ 6525.911076] bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c [ 6525.915957] bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func+0x14/0x20 [ 6525.920398] bpf_test_run+0x70/0x1b0 [ 6525.923969] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xec/0x190 [ 6525.928326] __do_sys_bpf+0xc88/0x1b28 [ 6525.932072] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x24/0x30 [ 6525.935820] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x70/0x168 [ 6525.940607] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6525.943920] el0_sync_handler+0x88/0x190 [ 6525.947838] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6525.951154] Code: d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 (d4202000) [ 6525.957249] ---[ end trace cecc3f93b14927e2 ]--- The reason is the offset[] creation and later usage while building the eBPF body. The code currently omits the first instruction, since build_insn() will increase our ctx->idx before saving it. That was fine up until bounded eBPF loops were introduced. After that introduction, offset[0] must be the offset of the end of prologue which is the start of the 1st insn while, offset[n] holds the offset of the end of n-th insn. When "taken loop with back jump to 1st insn" test runs, it will eventually call bpf2a64_offset(-1, 2, ctx). Since negative indexing is permitted, the current outcome depends on the value stored in ctx->offset[-1], which has nothing to do with our array. If the value happens to be 0 the tests will work. If not this error triggers. 7c2e988f400e ("bpf: fix x64 JIT code generation for jmp to 1st insn") fixed an indentical bug on x86 when eBPF bounded loops were introduced. So let's fix it by creating the ctx->offset[] correctly in the first place and account for the first instruction while calculating the arm instruction offsets. Fixes: 2589726d12a1 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju Reported-by: Jiri Olsa Co-developed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker Co-developed-by: Yauheni Kaliuta Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas --- Changes since v1: - Added Co-developed-by, Reported-by and Fixes tags correctly - Describe the expected context of ctx->offset[] in comments arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index f8912e45be7a..0974effff58c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -143,9 +143,13 @@ static inline void emit_addr_mov_i64(const int reg, const u64 val, } } -static inline int bpf2a64_offset(int bpf_to, int bpf_from, +static inline int bpf2a64_offset(int bpf_insn, int off, const struct jit_ctx *ctx) { + /* arm64 offset is relative to the branch instruction */ + int bpf_from = bpf_insn + 1; + /* BPF JMP offset is relative to the next instruction */ + int bpf_to = bpf_insn + off + 1; int to = ctx->offset[bpf_to]; /* -1 to account for the Branch instruction */ int from = ctx->offset[bpf_from] - 1; @@ -642,7 +646,7 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, /* JUMP off */ case BPF_JMP | BPF_JA: - jmp_offset = bpf2a64_offset(i + off, i, ctx); + jmp_offset = bpf2a64_offset(i, off, ctx); check_imm26(jmp_offset); emit(A64_B(jmp_offset), ctx); break; @@ -669,7 +673,7 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSLE | BPF_X: emit(A64_CMP(is64, dst, src), ctx); emit_cond_jmp: - jmp_offset = bpf2a64_offset(i + off, i, ctx); + jmp_offset = bpf2a64_offset(i, off, ctx); check_imm19(jmp_offset); switch (BPF_OP(code)) { case BPF_JEQ: @@ -912,18 +916,26 @@ static int build_body(struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool extra_pass) const struct bpf_insn *insn = &prog->insnsi[i]; int ret; + /* + * offset[0] offset of the end of prologue, start of the + * first insn. + * offset[x] - offset of the end of x insn. + */ + if (ctx->image == NULL) + ctx->offset[i] = ctx->idx; + ret = build_insn(insn, ctx, extra_pass); if (ret > 0) { i++; if (ctx->image == NULL) - ctx->offset[i] = ctx->idx; + ctx->offset[i] = ctx->offset[i - 1]; continue; } - if (ctx->image == NULL) - ctx->offset[i] = ctx->idx; if (ret) return ret; } + if (ctx->image == NULL) + ctx->offset[i] = ctx->idx; return 0; } @@ -1002,7 +1014,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog) memset(&ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx)); ctx.prog = prog; - ctx.offset = kcalloc(prog->len, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL); + ctx.offset = kcalloc(prog->len + 1, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL); if (ctx.offset == NULL) { prog = orig_prog; goto out_off; @@ -1089,7 +1101,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog) prog->jited_len = prog_size; if (!prog->is_func || extra_pass) { - bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo(prog, ctx.offset); + bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo(prog, ctx.offset + 1); out_off: kfree(ctx.offset); kfree(jit_data); -- 2.28.0 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel