[PATCH v2 2/3] PM / Domains: Allow to abort power off when no ->power_off() callback

From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] PM / Domains: Allow to abort power off when no ->power_off() callback
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:04:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200924110449.329523-3-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200924110449.329523-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

In genpd_power_off() we may decide to abort the power off of the PM domain,
even beyond the point when the governor would accept it. The abort is done
if it turns out that a child domain has been requested to be powered on,
which means it's waiting for the lock of the parent to be released.

However, the abort is currently only considered if the genpd in question
has a ->power_off() callback assigned. This is unnecessary limiting,
especially if the genpd would have a parent of its own. Let's remove the
limitation and make the behaviour consistent.

Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
---

Changes in v2:
	- None.

---
 drivers/base/power/domain.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
index 23aa2feced77..0198af358503 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
@@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ static int genpd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, bool one_dev_on,
 	struct pm_domain_data *pdd;
 	struct gpd_link *link;
 	unsigned int not_suspended = 0;
+	int ret;
 
 	/*
 	 * Do not try to power off the domain in the following situations:
@@ -544,24 +545,13 @@ static int genpd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, bool one_dev_on,
 	if (!genpd->gov)
 		genpd->state_idx = 0;
 
-	if (genpd->power_off) {
-		int ret;
-
-		if (atomic_read(&genpd->sd_count) > 0)
-			return -EBUSY;
+	/* Don't power off, if a child domain is waiting to power on. */
+	if (atomic_read(&genpd->sd_count) > 0)
+		return -EBUSY;
 
-		/*
-		 * If sd_count > 0 at this point, one of the subdomains hasn't
-		 * managed to call genpd_power_on() for the parent yet after
-		 * incrementing it.  In that case genpd_power_on() will wait
-		 * for us to drop the lock, so we can call .power_off() and let
-		 * the genpd_power_on() restore power for us (this shouldn't
-		 * happen very often).
-		 */
-		ret = _genpd_power_off(genpd, true);
-		if (ret)
-			return ret;
-	}
+	ret = _genpd_power_off(genpd, true);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	genpd->status = GENPD_STATE_OFF;
 	genpd_update_accounting(genpd);
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
