From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D31DC433DF for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:19:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACAE92076E for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="CaSsgdub" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ACAE92076E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To: From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=fObU/UZ7FIww6bTh/6AgMiECjPCo8mODCCjVqIh5Xs8=; b=CaSsgdub18+XHegubqlturf6z0 hi4jrB8Yyq+vSO0BXH/O8KrVxotGoO3EwZ81ZUrHjUMihIc3Pxsjprea2/W9PcGKMc9vyEsAXRCUi f98+KuNvcDGGYmHwa67Cy4xPVrWKWH3UM8+Cygj8abXzhhqzc294EynzjW6UVooz4d0Ir4f91XUud /1RERv7RD+Iw+qDuYPHc9Lq738K+fJu6a1EPdhiy1xrF5spqebDR48q33lGhzCwXtf2WH1bats0Mz 5Gp55izYsq2+Vmpc6VYwm2I5C/56/T3rEcVpV3u57QhA8LXOs457u3s6W1EMyrHnrSUDRhP3n3tx1 +b9cpPsw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kRyeD-0000Jq-FE; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:17:57 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kRyeB-0000JJ-95 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:17:56 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD9F31B; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 07:17:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa.arm.com (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CCF3E3F66B; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 07:17:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Sudeep Holla To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Add missing Rx size re-initialisation Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 15:17:46 +0100 Message-Id: <20201012141746.32575-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20201008143722.21888-2-etienne.carriere@linaro.org> References: <20201008143722.21888-2-etienne.carriere@linaro.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201012_101755_616073_C8A93E57 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.20 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Souvik.Chakravarty@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sudeep Holla , vincent.guittot@linaro.org, Etienne Carriere , Cristian Marussi MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Few commands provide the list of description partially and require to be called consecutively until all the descriptors are fetched completely. In such cases, we don't release the buffers and reuse them for consecutive transmits. However, currently we don't reset the Rx size which will be set as per the response for the last transmit. This may result in incorrect response size being interpretted as the firmware may repond with size greater than the one set but we read only upto the size set by previous response. Let us reset the receive buffer size to max possible in such cases as we don't know the exact size of the response. Fixes: b6f20ff8bd94 ("firmware: arm_scmi: add common infrastructure and support for base protocol") Reported-by: Etienne Carriere Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla --- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c | 2 ++ drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 2 ++ drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h | 8 ++++++++ drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 2 ++ drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c | 2 ++ 5 files changed, 16 insertions(+) Hi Etienne, I reworked this in a different way and hence dropped your authorship and added reported by. If you prefer I can attribute you as author. I want to push 2,4,5/5 as fixes and hence the rush. Regards, Sudeep diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c index 9853bd3c4d45..017e5d8bd869 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c @@ -197,6 +197,8 @@ static int scmi_base_implementation_list_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, protocols_imp[tot_num_ret + loop] = *(list + loop); tot_num_ret += loop_num_ret; + + scmi_reset_rx_to_maxsz(handle, t); } while (loop_num_ret); scmi_xfer_put(handle, t); diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c index c1cfe3ee3d55..4645677d86f1 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c @@ -192,6 +192,8 @@ scmi_clock_describe_rates_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 clk_id, } tot_rate_cnt += num_returned; + + scmi_reset_rx_to_maxsz(handle, t); /* * check for both returned and remaining to avoid infinite * loop due to buggy firmware diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h index 37fb583f1bf5..a3f1bc44b1de 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h @@ -245,6 +245,14 @@ extern const struct scmi_desc scmi_mailbox_desc; extern const struct scmi_desc scmi_smc_desc; #endif +static inline void scmi_reset_rx_to_maxsz(const struct scmi_handle *handle, + struct scmi_xfer *xfer) +{ + struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(handle); + + xfer->rx.len = info->desc->max_msg_size; +} + void scmi_rx_callback(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, u32 msg_hdr); void scmi_free_channel(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct idr *idr, int id); diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c index ed475b40bd08..82fb3babff72 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c @@ -304,6 +304,8 @@ scmi_perf_describe_levels_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain, } tot_opp_cnt += num_returned; + + scmi_reset_rx_to_maxsz(handle, t); /* * check for both returned and remaining to avoid infinite * loop due to buggy firmware diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c index 9703cf6356a0..b4232d611033 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c @@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ static int scmi_sensor_description_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, } desc_index += num_returned; + + scmi_reset_rx_to_maxsz(handle, t); /* * check for both returned and remaining to avoid infinite * loop due to buggy firmware -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel