linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: fw_devlink on will break all snps,dw-apb-gpio users
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:02:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201015120206.41b6a454@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGETcx9PiX==mLxB9PO8Myyk6u2vhPVwTMsA5NkD-ywH5xhusw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:29:36 -0700
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote:

> CAUTION: Email originated externally, do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 4:12 AM Jisheng Zhang
> <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > If set fw_devlink as on, any consumers of dw apb gpio won't probe.
> >
> > The related dts looks like:
> >
> > gpio0: gpio@2400 {
> >        compatible = "snps,dw-apb-gpio";
> >        #address-cells = <1>;
> >        #size-cells = <0>;
> >
> >        porta: gpio-port@0 {
> >               compatible = "snps,dw-apb-gpio-port";
> >               gpio-controller;
> >               #gpio-cells = <2>;
> >               ngpios = <32>;
> >               reg = <0>;
> >        };
> > };
> >
> > device_foo {
> >         status = "okay"
> >         ...;
> >         reset-gpio = <&porta, 0, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > };
> >
> > If I change the reset-gpio property to use another kind of gpio phandle,
> > e.g gpio expander, then device_foo can be probed successfully.
> >
> > The gpio expander dt node looks like:
> >
> >         expander3: gpio@44 {
> >                 compatible = "fcs,fxl6408";
> >                 pinctrl-names = "default";
> >                 pinctrl-0 = <&expander3_pmux>;
> >                 reg = <0x44>;
> >                 gpio-controller;
> >                 #gpio-cells = <2>;
> >                 interrupt-parent = <&portb>;
> >                 interrupts = <23 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
> >                 interrupt-controller;
> >                 #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> >         };
> >
> > The common pattern looks like the devlink can't cope with suppliers from
> > child dt node.  
> 
> fw_devlink doesn't have any problem dealing with child devices being
> suppliers. The problem with your case is that the
> drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c driver directly parses the child nodes and
> never creates struct devices for them. If you have a node with
> compatible string, fw_devlink expects you to create and probe a struct
> device for it. So change your driver to add the child devices as
> devices instead of just parsing the node directly and doing stuff with
> it.
> 
> Either that, or stop putting "compatible" string in a node if you
> don't plan to actually treat it as a device -- but that's too late for
> this driver (it needs to be backward compatible). So change the driver
> to add of_platform_populate() and write a driver that probes
> "snps,dw-apb-gpio-port".
> 

Thanks for the information. The "snps,dw-apb-gpio-port" is never used,
so I just sent out a series to remove it.

Thanks

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-15  4:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-14 11:12 fw_devlink on will break all snps,dw-apb-gpio users Jisheng Zhang
2020-10-14 17:29 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-10-15  4:02   ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2020-10-15  5:04     ` Saravana Kannan
2020-10-15  8:14       ` Jisheng Zhang
2020-10-15  8:48         ` Saravana Kannan
2020-10-15  9:52           ` Jisheng Zhang
2020-10-15 14:08             ` Robin Murphy
2020-10-16  3:39               ` Jisheng Zhang
2020-10-17  0:44                 ` Saravana Kannan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201015120206.41b6a454@xhacker.debian \
    --to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).