From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A597CC388F7 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 21:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D559C20724 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 21:24:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="gGU+jRle" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D559C20724 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=opensynergy.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Owner; bh=R8h0cD82Ygpff6qbjP0Y+RXEnd4HTZeM1rbgcR2LF7c=; b=gGU+jRleHlenERoTaQhRw1XWQe qF5b60JdHSBxoDXjkBYziXTXk/BNr2flySTAPmQyo0bW/x1oujgZh2I5CH1MNXK8NMJzFCapQqWVJ /mXEfhqEJYqTS4tQ2uzXxjc4k10Hk/cXCaerlbyq40TtLkB9NofFtsgQC03zEiQC+7JvZg042/luE b32hTAjDzm1iD3lf9ADgmMMvtfzPCrQve5ynwplc7k5UVzPUxBqY4ze01he/3y0T3ewTHxP5jLpS0 Axt4IxCtAQUXcD/AhpDYMIsi0FUdE3NGmIfY0iHDZNG9OF1/oAts5lv7btuS/AB53P1o7BKtsrsIt Gz3Wjxww==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kami8-0003zB-R1; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 21:22:24 +0000 Received: from plasma4.jpberlin.de ([80.241.57.33]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kamhc-0003oT-VT for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 21:21:56 +0000 Received: from spamfilter01.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter01.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.115]) by plasma.jpberlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4ECAB7DC; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 22:21:43 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from plasma.jpberlin.de ([80.241.56.68]) by spamfilter01.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter01.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.115]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id r4z_FNNlEUTs; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 22:21:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail.opensynergy.com (unknown [217.66.60.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.opensynergy.com", Issuer "Starfield Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (not verified)) (Authenticated sender: opensynergy@jpberlin.de) by plasma.jpberlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03EE6AB751; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 22:21:41 +0100 (CET) From: Peter Hilber To: , , , Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 00/10] firmware: arm_scmi: Add virtio transport Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 22:21:06 +0100 Message-ID: <20201105212116.411422-1-peter.hilber@opensynergy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: SR-MAIL-01.open-synergy.com (10.26.10.21) To SR-MAIL-01.open-synergy.com (10.26.10.21) X-MBO-SPAM-Probability: X-Rspamd-Score: -3.70 / 15.00 / 15.00 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DE4ECAB7DC X-Rspamd-UID: ee1eec X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201105_162153_151406_8DC172A5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.57 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: jean-philippe@linaro.org, mikhail.golubev@opensynergy.com, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, igor.skalkin@opensynergy.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Peter Hilber , anton.yakovlev@opensynergy.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org This series implements an SCMI virtio driver according to the virtio SCMI device spec patch v5 [1], after simple preparatory changes to the existing arm-scmi driver. The virtio transport differs in some respects from the existing shared-memory based SCMI transports. Message timeouts can be a problem if the virtio device (SCMI platform) does not have real-time properties. I set a high message rx timeout value which should work for non real-time virtio devices as well. There are other timeouts for delayed response and polling which were not addressed yet. Delayed responses are not really needed since, with the virtio transport, message responses may be transmitted out of order. Polling doesn't make sense at least for virtio devices without real-time behavior, in my understanding. There are some known issues which will be resolved before removing the RFC tag: - Further work is needed on the scmi_xfer management. Unlike shmem based transports, the virtio transport is actually exchanging messages with the SCMI agent through the scmi_xfer tx and rx buffers. In case of a message rx timeout, the arm-scmi driver could try to re-use the scmi_xfer, while that might still be used by the virtio device. I think part of the scmi_xfers_info bookkeeping could be optionally outsourced to the transport to remediate this. - After arm-scmi driver probe failure, or after remove, the scmi-virtio driver may still try to process and forward message responses from the virtio device. - We must be sure that the virtio transport option (such as virtio over MMIO) is available when the virtio SCMI device is probed. The series is based on for-next/scmi [2], on top of commit b9ceca6be432 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Fix duplicate workqueue name") The series was actually tested with a v5.4 based kernel, with the Base protocol and Sensor management protocol. The virtio SCMI device used was a proprietary implementation by OpenSynergy. Delayed responses were not tested. Changes in RFC v2: - Remove the DT virtio_transport phandle, since the SCMI virtio device may not be known in advance. Instead, use the first suitable probed device. Change due to Rob Herring's comment. Any comments are very welcome. [1] https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202005/msg00096.html [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux.git Igor Skalkin (7): firmware: arm_scmi, smccc, mailbox: Make shmem based transports optional firmware: arm_scmi: Document that max_msg is a per channel type limit firmware: arm_scmi: Add op to override max message # firmware: arm_scmi: Add per message transport data firmware: arm_scmi: Add xfer_init_buffers transport op dt-bindings: arm: Add virtio transport for SCMI firmware: arm_scmi: Add virtio transport Peter Hilber (3): firmware: arm_scmi: Add optional link_supplier() transport op firmware: arm_scmi: Add per-device transport private info firmware: arm_scmi: Add is_scmi_protocol_device() .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt | 35 +- MAINTAINERS | 1 + drivers/firmware/Kconfig | 19 +- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile | 3 +- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c | 5 + drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h | 37 +- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 124 ++++- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/virtio.c | 493 ++++++++++++++++++ drivers/firmware/smccc/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/mailbox/Kconfig | 1 + include/uapi/linux/virtio_ids.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/virtio_scmi.h | 41 ++ 12 files changed, 736 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/virtio.c create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/virtio_scmi.h base-commit: b9ceca6be43233845be70792be9b5ab315d2e010 -- 2.25.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel