From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8772C2D0A3 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 06:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EAD420665 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 06:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="PWgVXj2B"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="zXLhGIo6" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1EAD420665 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=3sPKUZXmtnbGetwHR4L7gSnuBowGWCQ7y1VIiNStGi0=; b=PWgVXj2BL/xpeye1yqtnwlhgN XAxB9vSvx17CJeCU8qK75LG2rZvhOvJqaeJB5QsTsQrVsEFUybUOlZCSXUQdIUQZ+u/Vj2PvqqzVA kjgHenL8OWJvNaH4sHXTRI94u6w5BB+1/vNA6kSJpJHYSw+S8F4Dn8Hwu8prCablkSSW8PAW49yO0 fY0hJ8U068s0+AY/FOZY57sc8dHyzT9cHwxsaOvB2x5DLWDeVppJVqa6frhxcVRb9o1b5riXiBTYX SSRS8AMk6QXaEJsq4afVvzjBV/pbQCQE8N2VII+EXqtCziBbqavc1JMgxN6CcKE39eg0Q6minxhoD ZZy1i6fdw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kc17f-0007Mh-Mu; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 06:57:51 +0000 Received: from mail-pl1-x641.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::641]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kc17c-0007Lr-MC for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 06:57:49 +0000 Received: by mail-pl1-x641.google.com with SMTP id f21so4264940plr.5 for ; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 22:57:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=KF1/cMn6ow1Nl4dL4x6qzs3WxXHhYa+fonGftd0XHGk=; b=zXLhGIo6SEIUKcewyE6ufIb64yJVWCABNtTkBYh7d4D4TvYXa540vr/vFWmzrxVxyb wlC0XFXCqonycWbXTsMVO+x3Py2FcLnChddb3OLJ3dHSS1jUaozYWj2h74tMNky805Uw lOObM4byt6gHew/oAXo1GSDjAxHmOjPTe/D30uCZl/Rji4N4RWJH1n0EHvS0LMlTTY5e h6iD19z5V/2lsqIBMxCuPE3/J0o1IoJNinBcoUQtFEtYKl05r24H3x0kFQ1yWbb1jdi0 XyOkkwP7iOzCyo84BvoARxMew7Flcf1qG2gciFljzZc+UgbEDc3bSwkFZxCi307NPWcH +zpQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=KF1/cMn6ow1Nl4dL4x6qzs3WxXHhYa+fonGftd0XHGk=; b=RbSc5gEjEMb3KQcSFvUH2340pvBP6mg0B44sRPeiv/YC5x5zx+OYfjPppf/pPiR7CZ b+1Yg/FTCV6yF/jrRCDPuu4IyIHzvEeqQXpjZEdMJEBuMJnYu8NieHskA9TBuoW9Rj8M 9I0gMLfsvxO3f3qKfDvZjD4UEU/MY9Wi6SFuyKT4tWjApjGPCeAvAAp/ntA/ZNG+KuK4 IV1rP/Tsfik1+fo0JkVeyT6ueBonNdUhq4uY+0el2lmgDAL422ERinE7Gv8nTRMsluLZ Uj8ZBHLH07J+dT8oAU+VZFxonJ/eDzzCkdwUSVEfVWus0tRyagAzWPIJcFQDsIlJrRyI by+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vf9RKtZZ2p8HmUlLe9yZW8FoNNI3U2M5mnrehpO8tJS5QJQmI LhukVGQOIbzyWTd2+oq2zEenpA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+XEDLwRGrEJmvpdHPokEDmxTA6uwQTvouoJ2/owTVyISLQ9AuM70t0bW5X57j8Gwmgr9IJA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6bc8:b029:d6:d9d:f28c with SMTP id m8-20020a1709026bc8b02900d60d9df28cmr11217116plt.17.1604905065103; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 22:57:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([122.172.12.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9sm3157998pfn.191.2020.11.08.22.57.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 08 Nov 2020 22:57:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 12:27:42 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Lukasz Luba Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] [RFC] CPUFreq: Add support for cpu-perf-dependencies Message-ID: <20201109065742.22czfgyjhsjmkytf@vireshk-i7> References: <20201102120115.29993-1-nicola.mazzucato@arm.com> <20201102120115.29993-4-nicola.mazzucato@arm.com> <20201106092020.za3oxg7gutzc3y2b@vireshk-i7> <0a334a73-45ef-58ff-7dfd-9df6f4ff290a@arm.com> <20201106105514.bhtdklyhn7goml64@vireshk-i7> <7f73bcd6-0f06-4ef0-7f02-0751e6c4d94b@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7f73bcd6-0f06-4ef0-7f02-0751e6c4d94b@arm.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201109_015748_747166_73C99006 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.79 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: nm@ti.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org, vireshk@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, Nicola Mazzucato , sudeep.holla@arm.com, chris.redpath@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 06-11-20, 11:14, Lukasz Luba wrote: > I also had similar doubts, because if we make frequency requests > independently for each CPU, why not having N cooling devs, which > will set independently QoS max freq for them... > > What convinced me: > EAS and FIE would know the 'real' frequency of the cluster, IPA > can use it also and have only one cooling device per cluster. > > We would like to keep this old style 'one cooling device per cpuset'. > I don't have strong opinion and if it would appear that there are > some errors in freq estimation for cluster, then maybe it does make > more sense to have cdev per CPU... Let me rephrase my question. What is it that doesn't work _correctly_ with cdev per cpufreq policy in your case? What doesn't work well if the thermal stuff keeps looking at only the related_cpus thing and not the cpu-perf-dependencies thing? -- viresh _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel