From: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Zhengyuan Liu <liuzhengyuan@tj.kylinos.cn>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init functions name to be generic
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 16:38:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201119003829.1282810-2-atish.patra@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201119003829.1282810-1-atish.patra@wdc.com>
This is a preparatory patch for unifying numa implementation between
ARM64 & RISC-V. As the numa implementation will be moved to generic
code, rename the arm64 related functions to a generic one.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h | 4 ++--
arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 12 ------------
arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 4 ++--
arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
index dd870390d639..ffc1dcdf1871 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
}
#endif
-void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
+void __init arch_numa_init(void);
int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
void __init numa_free_distance(void);
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
-static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
+static inline void arch_numa_init(void) { }
static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
index 7ff800045434..fdfecf0991ce 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
@@ -118,15 +118,3 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)
node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
}
-int __init arm64_acpi_numa_init(void)
-{
- int ret;
-
- ret = acpi_numa_init();
- if (ret) {
- pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
- return ret;
- }
-
- return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
-}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 095540667f0f..977b47f6815a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -407,10 +407,10 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
max_pfn = max_low_pfn = max;
min_low_pfn = min;
- arm64_numa_init();
+ arch_numa_init();
/*
- * must be done after arm64_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
+ * must be done after arch_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
* initialize node_online_map that gets used in hugetlb_cma_reserve()
* while allocating required CMA size across online nodes.
*/
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
index a8303bc6b62a..0dae54ce7d43 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
-#include <asm/acpi.h>
#include <asm/sections.h>
struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
@@ -445,16 +444,36 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
return 0;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
+static int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = acpi_numa_init();
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
+}
+#else
+static int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
+{
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+#endif
+
/**
- * arm64_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
+ * arch_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
*
* Try each configured NUMA initialization method until one succeeds. The
* last fallback is dummy single node config encompassing whole memory.
*/
-void __init arm64_numa_init(void)
+void __init arch_numa_init(void)
{
if (!numa_off) {
- if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arm64_acpi_numa_init))
+ if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arch_acpi_numa_init))
return;
if (acpi_disabled && !numa_init(of_numa_init))
return;
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-19 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-19 0:38 [PATCH v5 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V Atish Patra
2020-11-19 0:38 ` Atish Patra [this message]
2020-11-19 0:38 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] numa: Move numa implementation to common code Atish Patra
2020-11-19 1:12 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-19 0:38 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] riscv: Separate memory init from paging init Atish Patra
2021-03-10 16:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-03-12 15:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-11-19 0:38 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING Atish Patra
2020-11-19 0:38 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform Atish Patra
2020-12-14 1:02 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V Atish Patra
2021-01-09 20:51 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-01-11 19:31 ` Atish Patra
2021-01-14 5:21 ` Palmer Dabbelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201119003829.1282810-2-atish.patra@wdc.com \
--to=atish.patra@wdc.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=liuzhengyuan@tj.kylinos.cn \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).