From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11061C2D0E4 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:47:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B61720738 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="hEFtwlGy" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8B61720738 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=DKgMhY7xYB9/tiafh6a4NEKV4NghGnICIK+7WdAfTk4=; b=hEFtwlGycJpmpkgxVmFY5XUNf h5Wh9El6BOL9SfxAosKQjZ9m8ZrX57d4lDVfOQxwgzOIdKcXzMoHhyq07TX7GIKicwzKLgqHn56qw 8f3oNuP1G301e9nnYw2+cyUFyqqh3pilVGYt96idEBcISh7EkjtyiY6GBIe6kMD0jPjO2WQG+LhDN 7p0SHohhEHFoyWBKBy12uj3qljVRGc61cqX7N7qTXcNTrgb8OEh5T9jqP0vqwAvHOH2HtGTA2LTOY sRoAlgRDBgRLzjeJNYlr4QDWr4jmo5HD6fipFy+T0ke+9m9Yw3Sc/WTbQG7MzcTMW5oG5P/XDBJOP kvoYoxSEg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1khZar-0005J8-DH; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:46:57 +0000 Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1khZap-0005Il-DU; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:46:55 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 091643012DF; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:46:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DA1A9200D4E96; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:46:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:46:53 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Yu Zhao Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] mm: proc: Avoid fullmm flush for young/dirty bit toggling Message-ID: <20201124144653.GJ2414@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20201120143557.6715-1-will@kernel.org> <20201120143557.6715-7-will@kernel.org> <20201120204005.GC1303870@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201120204005.GC1303870@google.com> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Anshuman Khandual , Will Deacon , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Minchan Kim , Catalin Marinas , kernel-team@android.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 01:40:05PM -0700, Yu Zhao wrote: > It seems to me ARM's interpretation of tlb->fullmm is a special case, > not the other way around. I don't think ARM is special here, IIRC there were more architectures that did that. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel