From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44556C4361B for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 11:05:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8DDB233A0 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 11:05:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E8DDB233A0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=rJjQuW9NluibOadugpIlPgqsBo6rLLvupRM0k/EZzqI=; b=cKOs2bXmwy1v6ugWlut7cZVjd nhsGN4ZBQbzbU41KR5R5YWwFL9hcDsdG2t51dQVWMKnj5QCLTwJLJE4vq++A+mDs/kljDtwtEc+bY Jfu+/lWK9c3yv2rFX8UJlP7WsFnWeIqG38RSDijYtsNgHsHWQDcnnp3OfYcIPOrVVnQB1XGJmDLJX g/yHAehLNFnwH9N9wu+PCzi1M2fR0/iBfz3mD8FGM5XugbZ3dvE1J4esvsSaFN2YnjJ0zmWnHo2SI xx2/VNlFU4qGpkNNbrgxhnd3xhd+4BxXNgiJq53vILgpb3wjNOYgKpYRw4lWh/YrfhuiycXglLHP5 zzry9OSSw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kqDYl-0002PE-Hf; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 11:04:31 +0000 Received: from mail-pl1-x62c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kqDYj-0002OK-AE for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 11:04:30 +0000 Received: by mail-pl1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id x18so1223890pln.6 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 03:04:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=06IzISd15kJf8c0sRywqlOU/noMqseWAhUJLkwOnXSk=; b=Rs05RT8JRyqP61kDoVh3MARnWZa/0rfY9uWwjcVMyutSGwX0MqyK+Y3tENtuEwRfZi JVxFpf51+J3uNtFsVQo2DgXr5v6nS6x/Lapd8W0doJyDrVt9IVVSrq/87vdPNLc+WPly z1PSZm5/3gBkwzHIGgI+WqZ5vX3osO6GB1YZLVjaRfdoQuL+AYiFWhcs0Cfi60qE5NH1 6meJnFBShcZ6jckIdQ4LhBGl7/Iv2GzDrex5cN7JBg2Aqql1geA0RUswh+9CQfp0FXET g2gUwt+li9rc+iwwkIy6IjMM/Q9OVYJserb0OzcMIqI1/sPrd1R2ACii6cCw/c4hqqwV P57Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=06IzISd15kJf8c0sRywqlOU/noMqseWAhUJLkwOnXSk=; b=LGm/k8QTOGlxuyvHhXQZD5P3QAcjVOmyYyM2u+pCtofhOHCeFkRtiU7/4uVmXkCCOV atYEghTXZbpA83F0r8cjMBbH2rSIda0YhLuIoKbOfoDcl3VENfHe8yaBO+Ytt21Anfxl yYzFlEhApu265MwAjCUeFD+h/XV/owwyX73OYrVrLEyYN54ZqwiZJz4UQAh6UBord6w4 QtKphgkC1XDxXrTMUHqqaXkOUcXuRX9yREVO0sIywuN8kPHUHeP1TZ4i1E0PjVN2BMbo Alnc+NBI+T82QA6GiXJ78Ueqm5fxXElaH3c8TGhZQxEBhjxsJjzVGMa3ussG7XX0UK8V Cf0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531aFGq01JdrJ33erouzptNmY7Ma6635hpER8lbpqDhJ7ygKf+NP eynczetjIidvbg6vtZNqBBVUkQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz6szkZyhlQiNcncUMNFjc7zrr8yyXEl3UiA+Zi3dCobdXcCDClzZWB+Ni46JeK8nxusd6VIw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:e2ce:: with SMTP id fr14mr3926867pjb.89.1608289465637; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 03:04:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([122.172.20.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b17sm7160748pjz.44.2020.12.18.03.04.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 03:04:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:34:23 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] arm64: topology: Avoid the have_policy check Message-ID: <20201218110423.mjfwgdazlaigeged@vireshk-i7> References: <5ffc7b9ed03c6301ac2f710f609282959491b526.1608010334.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <20201217075732.blac5pbca7prmuum@vireshk-i7> <20201217105524.GA15336@gaia> <20201218042602.4ymy4fg2zxeo6p4n@vireshk-i7> <20201218110114.GD5258@gaia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201218110114.GD5258@gaia> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201218_060429_469216_1AE8C5C9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.98 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Will Deacon , Ionela Voinescu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Vincent Guittot Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 18-12-20, 11:01, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 09:56:02AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 17-12-20, 10:55, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > Hi Viresh, > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 01:27:32PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > > On 15-12-20, 11:04, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > > > Every time I have stumbled upon this routine, I get confused with the > > > > > way 'have_policy' is used and I have to dig in to understand why is it > > > > > so. Here is an attempt to make it easier to understand, and hopefully it > > > > > is an improvement. > > > > > > > > > > The 'have_policy' check was just an optimization to avoid writing > > > > > to amu_fie_cpus in case we don't have to, but that optimization itself > > > > > is creating more confusion than the real work. Lets just do that if all > > > > > the CPUs support AMUs. It is much cleaner that way. > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu > > > > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > > > > > --- > > > > > V3: > > > > > - Added Reviewed by tag. > > > > > > > > Catalin, please pick the first two patches for 5.11. I will send the > > > > last one separately later on. > > > > > > I haven't figured out whether these are fixes (a cover letter would > > > help ;)). They look like generic improvements to me > > > > Right they are and since the merge window just opened I thought these > > don't really need to wait for another full cycle to get in. > > Normally we freeze the arm64 tree around the -rc6 prior to the merging > window to give the patches a bit of time in linux-next. This time > around, given the holidays, Linus even stated that if not already in > -next at 5.10, it won't be pulled: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/13/290. Okay, sounds good. > So please re-post at -rc1 with the acks in place. Sure. -- viresh _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel