Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce PRU remoteproc consumer API

From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <grzegorz.jaszczyk@linaro.org>
Cc: ohad@wizery.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, praneeth@ti.com,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, t-kristo@ti.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	ssantosh@kernel.org, lee.jones@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rogerq@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce PRU remoteproc consumer API
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 16:27:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210106232704.GE9149@xps15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201216165239.2744-1-grzegorz.jaszczyk@linaro.org>

On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 05:52:34PM +0100, Grzegorz Jaszczyk wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> The Programmable Real-Time Unit and Industrial Communication Subsystem
> (PRU-ICSS or simply PRUSS) on various TI SoCs consists of dual 32-bit
> RISC cores (Programmable Real-Time Units, or PRUs) for program execution.
> 
> There are 3 foundation components for PRUSS subsystem: the PRUSS platform
> driver, the PRUSS INTC driver and the PRUSS remoteproc driver. All were
> already merged and can be found under:
> 1) drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c
>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml
> 2) drivers/irqchip/irq-pruss-intc.c
>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/ti,pruss-intc.yaml
> 3) drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c
>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,pru-rproc.yaml
> 
> The programmable nature of the PRUs provide flexibility to implement custom
> peripheral interfaces, fast real-time responses, or specialized data handling.
> Example of a PRU consumer drivers will be:
>   - Software UART over PRUSS
>   - PRU-ICSS Ethernet EMAC
> 
> In order to make usage of common PRU resources and allow the consumer drivers to
> configure the PRU hardware for specific usage the PRU API is introduced.
> 
> Patch #3 of this series depends on one not merged remteproc related patch [1].
> 
> Please see the individual patches for exact changes in each patch, following is
> the only change from v1:
>  - Change the 'prus' property name to 'ti,prus' as suggested by Rob Herring,
>  which influences patch #1 and patch #2
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20201121030156.22857-3-s-anna@ti.com/
> 
> Best regards,
> Grzegorz
> 
> Roger Quadros (1):
>   remoteproc: pru: Add pru_rproc_set_ctable() function
> 
> Suman Anna (2):
>   dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add PRU consumer bindings
>   remoteproc: pru: Deny rproc sysfs ops for PRU client driven boots
> 
> Tero Kristo (2):
>   remoteproc: pru: Add APIs to get and put the PRU cores
>   remoteproc: pru: Configure firmware based on client setup
> 
>  .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,pru-consumer.yaml  |  64 +++++
>  drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c                | 221 +++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/pruss.h                         |  78 +++++++

This patchset is giving checkpatch.pl errors and as such will not go further
with this revision.

>  3 files changed, 360 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,pru-consumer.yaml
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/pruss.h
> 
> -- 
> 2.29.0
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel