From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDF3C433DB for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 14:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5B6764DFF for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 14:47:49 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B5B6764DFF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=1dzgxp25yI9A/jgufNVQI/UIJjCzre+5j+AsIhp9qx0=; b=u/WiKVtUlwvjeasCwtrjgR72D aveoE12xsytbPevJwDiYdN2+wcqGsMw+O5mlsTszj2UcsjYJvIn+0l50KxX1gY/5SzSfn9g8YMIqo 8IL9SPxbJdNNj0AW4nhWxV8xw3EZjD7IUM5O8u1K8ZCJWLxTLZvHeEN5XgMTIoE+fu9Gw/JobqJmi OLTW9oqHsd7WReje5EKkaWCSW7FvF6X6FuQ99BYBOKnd/0mKIy8wP72aIjY7wywPn9yDUGRdPd4Xc YAQcIobH6Pfoa932MCnVXGptSvbEvI//H9t7nUDg5liQr2YKsTNfgqIH8XSXdLwh3TKGoDmRy7+uC ZTPb36M7Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l7ftt-0004YA-8a; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 14:46:29 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::535]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l7ftr-0004XQ-Hk; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 14:46:28 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id o7so2264532pgl.1; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 06:46:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ONy/oQQmnX5TrrjNFytVoLv75B7UXC2fqKWnMIXbGzs=; b=JvJ1qeNfvw6BcOjaGVSW5FIeL8kmh8OwMEOC4re7970bU1N83umruRDn8+w+fLl4RN 63EvVEhR6dqS8hoY8mApckXYpIrU6MSmB0GOny3r0m0f58w83FXlYnb2jj4OZptsfkYl 6snfOqi/Hjk7v4Khp5TrGaVjItOSRxAJKXH0JgFYUJRg3aOfNVESawuqryyssousV9k9 i3sK42o8TJSD0eIFg4IRMJJRoikqyjyUprXOlu9kS8USrZn1RAcAQXL2Rq+gdOoUjfFE DcF7Fq0L6QsyUr0wnVQhXzIMUVbuz0O+5BklkUnjDBuM2+9p2OSsbBkYK6hE7aGyJuKq gAMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ONy/oQQmnX5TrrjNFytVoLv75B7UXC2fqKWnMIXbGzs=; b=glW7b1Kzn8vkz1eDI4W5Jgv06nFY3wakWTvYWFBFTdagL1BEuXD2SHZ+kU/SvQWkXn 1gmENBnLeGx54sGVTTtP3KSSkNlySZDkW8kmTLJs6lS+rpn/wqbv4B13oNR4QqUDSuFM rzI2ZrsblI23NtI+k91m38e8PeKfLixyxZinnXDvrJ5fJ5GyARySGt+xYZwc0mYuiMVI te0F70TQ8WyK0mIdkDcVqTSKKoaFyE/Q69QW+ukMKO/g6+CvgLkeQlynkg5l99h91fxb P5JuVqfW2OXyoP1p0T2XOz3iWtPTfFKjOCfrVGNDLRy8C4KLKKyYCuC/w8TWQI8AClHS 8KJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532uYXWKUjYHeEs5Hd2WtFzO342SiJYrk6WlZ156vAB97x6ms8Wl x/UK2BJp0MD9XPZEgQfb3Qc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzai0dWbSt7+WLA3WtD42I4vYknfBo+7vrNRDV/4Nj5JBi54UmO9JfeYGktAdgIawh4bBqF1A== X-Received: by 2002:a62:a108:0:b029:1c1:119b:8713 with SMTP id b8-20020a62a1080000b02901c1119b8713mr8565016pff.74.1612449983550; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 06:46:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (61-230-45-44.dynamic-ip.hinet.net. [61.230.45.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z2sm6382878pfa.121.2021.02.04.06.46.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 04 Feb 2021 06:46:22 -0800 (PST) From: Lecopzer Chen To: will@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: kasan: don't populate vmalloc area for CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 22:46:12 +0800 Message-Id: <20210204144612.75582-1-lecopzer@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210204124543.GA20468@willie-the-truck> References: <20210204124543.GA20468@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210204_094627_605194_0B894773 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.20 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com, glider@google.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, ardb@kernel.org, yj.chiang@mediatek.com, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, dvyukov@google.com, aryabinin@virtuozzo.com, linux@roeck-us.net, andreyknvl@google.com, lecopzer@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, gustavoars@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, rppt@kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 06:32:49PM +0800, Lecopzer Chen wrote: > > Linux support KAsan for VMALLOC since commit 3c5c3cfb9ef4da9 > > ("kasan: support backing vmalloc space with real shadow memory") > > > > Like how the MODULES_VADDR does now, just not to early populate > > the VMALLOC_START between VMALLOC_END. > > similarly, the kernel code mapping is now in the VMALLOC area and > > should keep these area populated. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lecopzer Chen > > --- > > arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c > > index d8e66c78440e..39b218a64279 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c > > @@ -214,6 +214,7 @@ static void __init kasan_init_shadow(void) > > { > > u64 kimg_shadow_start, kimg_shadow_end; > > u64 mod_shadow_start, mod_shadow_end; > > + u64 vmalloc_shadow_start, vmalloc_shadow_end; > > phys_addr_t pa_start, pa_end; > > u64 i; > > > > @@ -223,6 +224,9 @@ static void __init kasan_init_shadow(void) > > mod_shadow_start = (u64)kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)MODULES_VADDR); > > mod_shadow_end = (u64)kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)MODULES_END); > > > > + vmalloc_shadow_start = (u64)kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)VMALLOC_START); > > + vmalloc_shadow_end = (u64)kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)VMALLOC_END); > > + > > /* > > * We are going to perform proper setup of shadow memory. > > * At first we should unmap early shadow (clear_pgds() call below). > > @@ -241,12 +245,21 @@ static void __init kasan_init_shadow(void) > > > > kasan_populate_early_shadow(kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)PAGE_END), > > (void *)mod_shadow_start); > > - kasan_populate_early_shadow((void *)kimg_shadow_end, > > - (void *)KASAN_SHADOW_END); > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC)) { > > Do we really need yet another CONFIG option for KASAN? What's the use-case > for *not* enabling this if you're already enabling one of the KASAN > backends? As I know, KASAN_VMALLOC now only supports KASAN_GENERIC and also KASAN_VMALLOC uses more memory to map real shadow memory (1/8 of vmalloc va). There should be someone can enable KASAN_GENERIC but can't use VMALLOC due to memory issue. > > + kasan_populate_early_shadow((void *)vmalloc_shadow_end, > > + (void *)KASAN_SHADOW_END); > > + if (vmalloc_shadow_start > mod_shadow_end) > > To echo Ard's concern: when is the above 'if' condition true? After reviewing this code, since VMALLOC_STAR is a compiler defined macro of MODULES_END, this if-condition will never be true. I also test it with removing this and works fine. I'll remove this in the next version patch, thanks a lot for pointing out this. BRs, Lecopzer _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel