linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, John.P.donnelly@oracle.com,
	wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, xiexiuqi@huawei.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	horms@verge.net.au, corbet@lwn.net, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	dyoung@redhat.com, guohanjun@huawei.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	nsaenzjulienne@suse.de, huawei.libin@huawei.com,
	prabhakar.pkin@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, will@kernel.org,
	rppt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 01/11] x86: kdump: replace the hard-coded alignment with macro CRASH_ALIGN
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:29:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210218032607.GD2871@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210130071025.65258-2-chenzhou10@huawei.com>

On 01/30/21 at 03:10pm, Chen Zhou wrote:
> Move CRASH_ALIGN to header asm/kexec.h for later use. Besides, the
> alignment of crash kernel regions in x86 is 16M(CRASH_ALIGN), but
> function reserve_crashkernel() also used 1M alignment. So just
> replace hard-coded alignment 1M with macro CRASH_ALIGN.
> 
> Suggested-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
> Tested-by: John Donnelly <John.p.donnelly@oracle.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h | 3 +++
>  arch/x86/kernel/setup.c      | 5 +----
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h
> index 6802c59e8252..be18dc7ae51f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@
>  
>  # define KEXEC_CONTROL_CODE_MAX_SIZE	2048
>  
> +/* 16M alignment for crash kernel regions */
> +#define CRASH_ALIGN		SZ_16M
> +
>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>  
>  #include <linux/string.h>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index 3412c4595efd..da769845597d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -390,9 +390,6 @@ static void __init memblock_x86_reserve_range_setup_data(void)
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
>  
> -/* 16M alignment for crash kernel regions */
> -#define CRASH_ALIGN		SZ_16M
> -
>  /*
>   * Keep the crash kernel below this limit.
>   *
> @@ -510,7 +507,7 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
>  	} else {
>  		unsigned long long start;
>  
> -		start = memblock_phys_alloc_range(crash_size, SZ_1M, crash_base,
> +		start = memblock_phys_alloc_range(crash_size, CRASH_ALIGN, crash_base,
>  						  crash_base + crash_size);

Looks good to me, thx.

Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>

>  		if (start != crash_base) {
>  			pr_info("crashkernel reservation failed - memory is in use.\n");
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-18  3:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-30  7:10 [PATCH v14 00/11] support reserving crashkernel above 4G on arm64 kdump Chen Zhou
2021-01-30  7:10 ` [PATCH v14 01/11] x86: kdump: replace the hard-coded alignment with macro CRASH_ALIGN Chen Zhou
2021-02-18  3:29   ` Baoquan He [this message]
2021-02-24 14:19   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-25  7:25     ` Baoquan He
2021-02-26  6:45       ` chenzhou
2021-02-26 15:38         ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-03-02  7:43           ` Baoquan He
2021-03-29  2:34             ` chenzhou
2021-01-30  7:10 ` [PATCH v14 02/11] x86: kdump: make the lower bound of crash kernel reservation consistent Chen Zhou
2021-02-18  3:33   ` Baoquan He
2021-02-24 14:35   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-25  7:08     ` Baoquan He
2021-02-25 14:42       ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-25 15:44         ` Baoquan He
2021-02-26  7:32           ` chenzhou
2021-01-30  7:10 ` [PATCH v14 03/11] x86: kdump: use macro CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX in functions reserve_crashkernel() Chen Zhou
2021-02-18  8:23   ` Baoquan He
2021-01-30  7:10 ` [PATCH v14 04/11] x86: kdump: move xen_pv_domain() check and insert_resource() to setup_arch() Chen Zhou
2021-02-18  4:14   ` Baoquan He
2021-01-30  7:10 ` [PATCH v14 05/11] x86: kdump: move reserve_crashkernel[_low]() into crash_core.c Chen Zhou
2021-01-30  7:10 ` [PATCH v14 06/11] x86/elf: Move vmcore_elf_check_arch_cross to arch/x86/include/asm/elf.h Chen Zhou
2021-02-18  6:31   ` Baoquan He
2021-02-18  7:05     ` chenzhou
2021-01-30  7:10 ` [PATCH v14 07/11] arm64: kdump: introduce some macroes for crash kernel reservation Chen Zhou
2021-02-04 16:20   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-02-04 16:27     ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-01-30  7:10 ` [PATCH v14 08/11] arm64: kdump: reimplement crashkernel=X Chen Zhou
2021-02-24 16:04   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-26 10:31     ` chenzhou
2021-02-26 10:43       ` chenzhou
2021-01-30  7:10 ` [PATCH v14 09/11] x86, arm64: Add ARCH_WANT_RESERVE_CRASH_KERNEL config Chen Zhou
2021-02-18  7:31   ` Baoquan He
2021-02-18  7:40     ` Baoquan He
2021-02-18  8:35   ` Baoquan He
2021-02-20  3:22     ` chenzhou
2021-01-30  7:10 ` [PATCH v14 10/11] arm64: kdump: add memory for devices by DT property linux, usable-memory-range Chen Zhou
2021-01-30  7:10 ` [PATCH v14 11/11] kdump: update Documentation about crashkernel Chen Zhou
2021-01-30 17:53   ` Randy Dunlap
2021-02-04  1:53     ` chenzhou
2021-02-18  8:40   ` Baoquan He
2021-02-20  3:25     ` chenzhou
2021-02-08  6:46 ` [PATCH v14 00/11] support reserving crashkernel above 4G on arm64 kdump chenzhou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210218032607.GD2871@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=John.P.donnelly@oracle.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chenzhou10@huawei.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
    --cc=prabhakar.pkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).