linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Trilok Soni <tsoni@codeaurora.org>,
	arve@android.com, Andrew Walbran <qwandor@google.com>,
	David Hartley <dhh@qti.qualcomm.com>,
	Achin Gupta <Achin.Gupta@arm.com>,
	Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
	Arunachalam Ganapathy <arunachalam.ganapathy@arm.com>,
	Marc Bonnici <marc.bonnici@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] arm64: smccc: Add support for SMCCCv1.2 input/output registers
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:18:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210326121833.GA56294@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210325144113.GB41100@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 02:41:13PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Sudeep,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 02:32:50PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > SMCCC v1.2 allows x8-x17 to be used as parameter registers and x4—x17
> > to be used as result registers in SMC64/HVC64. Arm Firmware Framework
> > for Armv8-A specification makes use of x0-x7 as parameter and result
> > registers.
> > 
> > Current SMCCC interface in the kernel just use x0-x7 as parameter and
> > x0-x3 as result registers. Let us add new interface to support x0-x7
> > as parameter and result registers. This can be extended to include
> > x8-x17 when there are users for the same.
> 
> Michael Kelley is also looking at using SMCCCv1.2, and on his HyperV
> thread I'd suggested we should deal with the whole set of SMCCCv1.2
> registers now to avoid future churn in this area (using struct both for
> the arguments and return values).
> 
> How painful would it be to extend this patch to do that?

I *think* the major change with this would be making the interfaces:

void arm_smccc_1_2_{hvc,smc}(struct arm_smccc_1_2_args *args,
			     struct arm_smccc_1_2_res *res);

... and callers manipulating the structs directly, with arm64 having
more fields, e.g.

// arm64
struct arm_smccc_1_2_args {
	unsigned long a1;
	...
	unsigned long a17;
}

struct arm_smccc_1_2_res {
	unsigned long a0;
	...
	unsigned long a17;
}

// arm
struct arm_smccc_1_2_args {
	unsigned long a1;
	...
	unsigned long a7;
}

struct arm_smccc_1_2_res {
	unsigned long a0;
	...
	unsigned long a7;
}

I think that can be hidden in the FF-A wrappers, so that doesn't need to
be what FF-A drivers see. Does that sound plausible, or is that painful?
 
> > +  DEFINE(ARM_SMCCC_V1_2_RES_X0_OFFS,	offsetof(struct arm_smccc_v1_2_res, a0));

As a general nit, for consistency with the existing arm_smccc_1_1 code,
could we please drop the 'V' in these names, and use `ARM_SMCCC_1_2` or
`arm_smccc_1_2` ?

FWIW, other than the above comments, this all looks good to me

Thanks,
Mark.

> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S
> > index d62447964ed9..0ea15c1742f3 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S
> > @@ -43,3 +43,25 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__arm_smccc_hvc)
> >  	SMCCC	hvc
> >  SYM_FUNC_END(__arm_smccc_hvc)
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__arm_smccc_hvc)
> > +
> > +	.macro SMCCC_v1_2 instr
> > +	.cfi_startproc
> > +	\instr #0
> > +	ldr x8, [sp]
> > +	stp x0, x1, [x8, #ARM_SMCCC_V1_2_RES_X0_OFFS]
> > +	stp x2, x3, [x8, #ARM_SMCCC_V1_2_RES_X2_OFFS]
> > +	stp x4, x5, [x8, #ARM_SMCCC_V1_2_RES_X4_OFFS]
> > +	stp x6, x7, [x8, #ARM_SMCCC_V1_2_RES_X6_OFFS]
> > +	ret
> > +	.cfi_endproc
> > +.endm
> > +
> > +SYM_FUNC_START(arm_smccc_v1_2_hvc)
> > +	SMCCC_v1_2 hvc
> > +SYM_FUNC_END(arm_smccc_v1_2_hvc)
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arm_smccc_v1_2_hvc)
> > +
> > +SYM_FUNC_START(arm_smccc_v1_2_smc)
> > +	SMCCC_v1_2 smc
> > +SYM_FUNC_END(arm_smccc_v1_2_smc)
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arm_smccc_v1_2_smc)
> > diff --git a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> > index 62c54234576c..0b8fa285a054 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> > @@ -186,6 +186,56 @@ struct arm_smccc_res {
> >  	unsigned long a3;
> >  };
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> > +/* TODO Need to implement for ARM too */
> > +/**
> > + * struct arm_smccc_v1_2_res - Result from SMC/HVC call
> > + * @a0-a7 result values from registers 0 to 7
> > + */
> > +struct arm_smccc_v1_2_res {
> > +	unsigned long a0;
> > +	unsigned long a1;
> > +	unsigned long a2;
> > +	unsigned long a3;
> > +	unsigned long a4;
> > +	unsigned long a5;
> > +	unsigned long a6;
> > +	unsigned long a7;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * arm_smccc_v1_2_hvc() - make HVC calls
> > + * @a0-a7: arguments passed in registers 0 to 7
> > + * @res: result values from registers 0 to 7
> > + *
> > + * This function is used to make HVC calls following SMC Calling Convention
> > + * v1.2 or above. The content of the supplied param are copied to registers
> > + * 0 to 7 prior to the HVC instruction. The return values are updated with
> > + * the content from register 0 to 7 on return from the HVC instruction.
> > + */
> > +asmlinkage
> > +void arm_smccc_v1_2_hvc(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1, unsigned long a2,
> > +			unsigned long a3, unsigned long a4, unsigned long a5,
> > +			unsigned long a6, unsigned long a7,
> > +			struct arm_smccc_v1_2_res  *res);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * arm_smccc_v1_2_smc() - make SMC calls
> > + * @a0-a7: arguments passed in registers 0 to 7
> > + * @res: result values from registers 0 to 7
> > + *
> > + * This function is used to make SMC calls following SMC Calling Convention
> > + * v1.2 or above. The content of the supplied param are copied to registers
> > + * 0 to 7 prior to the SMC instruction. The return values are updated with
> > + * the content from register 0 to 7 on return from the SMC instruction.
> > + */
> > +asmlinkage
> > +void arm_smccc_v1_2_smc(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1, unsigned long a2,
> > +			unsigned long a3, unsigned long a4, unsigned long a5,
> > +			unsigned long a6, unsigned long a7,
> > +			struct arm_smccc_v1_2_res  *res);
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * struct arm_smccc_quirk - Contains quirk information
> >   * @id: quirk identification
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-26 12:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-25 14:32 [PATCH v5 0/7] firmware: Add initial support for Arm FF-A Sudeep Holla
2021-03-25 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] dt-bindings: Arm: Add Firmware Framework for Armv8-A (FF-A) binding Sudeep Holla
2021-03-26  5:05   ` Sumit Garg
2021-03-26 10:55     ` Sudeep Holla
2021-03-26 11:56       ` Sumit Garg
2021-03-30 15:03         ` Rob Herring
2021-04-06 15:08           ` Achin Gupta
2021-03-25 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] arm64: smccc: Add support for SMCCCv1.2 input/output registers Sudeep Holla
2021-03-25 14:41   ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-26 12:18     ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2021-03-26 12:51       ` Sudeep Holla
2021-04-01 15:50         ` Michael Kelley
2021-03-25 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] firmware: arm_ffa: Add initial FFA bus support for device enumeration Sudeep Holla
2021-03-25 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] firmware: arm_ffa: Add initial Arm FFA driver support Sudeep Holla
2021-03-25 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] firmware: arm_ffa: Add support for SMCCC as transport to FFA driver Sudeep Holla
2021-03-25 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] firmware: arm_ffa: Setup in-kernel users of FFA partitions Sudeep Holla
2021-04-09 15:45   ` Marc Bonnici
2021-03-25 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] firmware: arm_ffa: Add support for MEM_* interfaces Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210326121833.GA56294@C02TD0UTHF1T.local \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Achin.Gupta@arm.com \
    --cc=arunachalam.ganapathy@arm.com \
    --cc=arve@android.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dhh@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marc.bonnici@arm.com \
    --cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
    --cc=qwandor@google.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=tsoni@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).