From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77CDC43460 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 20:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FAC7613C6 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 20:45:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5FAC7613C6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=7OpoRiZPHBmTMRepcdJEco7fCujXiH9L55YkXtdyVqM=; b=UfZafT1xaCHo4FpMbYMKRsz6d r7PjEIFfFbSK9adagwJcmmc0ClxNkkC4jvtAwcSxdNjPlaWNI8gLW3/7FHdoFiECSuhss6azEJbhs opzSc5t95/CnV4JkiVzLazXxN/cnTmYW1dZJyeWLdrHKY7AR050mWAjX1Xsbd/qwWl3p4DKQc0ZFN LVWdNSGTCZLpD0fPivwrs8qz6DYw1IG+9H0oXcetYE8hfXBVjl//7bNoYDRPwKDZ7Qe81A3KTg8lA CMr/t8WEndT+2puMTPi1bTr1eyUIFfdbwe2cjmVPfmCA89Bu9rlHn9tNliKdGpDNMJloGRzMCwzVS SP+Pd86ag==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lTW4I-000dZc-TM; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 20:43:30 +0000 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lTW4D-000dXu-Ur for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 20:43:27 +0000 Received: from x64host.home (unknown [47.187.194.202]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0A9120B5680; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 13:43:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com D0A9120B5680 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1617655404; bh=3vjl15rMiDqv4mSST8OwRNwQRjNnBcJQwVTVSJPcYkA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hZp/7PiOyWv/RbE7eT/geBSDlVqU4jfhQfGR1weB0Z2iISStiTC/KzpKnVj9f6jBJ jCeZ3hkIyOOtPEZrOGHpNwwkhHO9028vBX7qES7qrMaJbdmdGyGFwqgUJtivrt8UGf +F5HbAdGBMOinF3E8YctgCYWbZwJqb211LKnnyBw= From: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com To: mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, jthierry@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: Implement infrastructure for stack trace reliability checks Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:43:10 -0500 Message-Id: <20210405204313.21346-2-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210405204313.21346-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> References: <705993ccb34a611c75cdae0a8cb1b40f9b218ebd> <20210405204313.21346-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210405_214326_354452_7460FDA4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.08 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" Implement a check_reliability() function that will contain checks for the presence of various features and conditions that can render the stack trace unreliable. Introduce the first reliability check - If a return PC encountered in a stack trace is not a valid kernel text address, the stack trace is considered unreliable. It could be some generated code. Other reliability checks will be added in the future. These checks will involve checking the return PC to see if it falls inside any special functions where the stack trace is considered unreliable. Implement the infrastructure needed for this. Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman --- arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 2 + arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h index eb29b1fe8255..684f65808394 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ struct stackframe { #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER int graph; #endif + bool reliable; }; extern int unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame); @@ -169,6 +170,7 @@ static inline void start_backtrace(struct stackframe *frame, bitmap_zero(frame->stacks_done, __NR_STACK_TYPES); frame->prev_fp = 0; frame->prev_type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN; + frame->reliable = true; } #endif /* __ASM_STACKTRACE_H */ diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c index ad20981dfda4..557657d6e6bd 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c @@ -18,6 +18,84 @@ #include #include +struct function_range { + unsigned long start; + unsigned long end; +}; + +/* + * Special functions where the stack trace is unreliable. + */ +static struct function_range special_functions[] = { + { /* sentinel */ } +}; + +static bool is_reliable_function(unsigned long pc) +{ + static bool inited = false; + struct function_range *func; + + if (!inited) { + static char sym[KSYM_NAME_LEN]; + unsigned long size, offset; + + for (func = special_functions; func->start; func++) { + if (kallsyms_lookup(func->start, &size, &offset, + NULL, sym)) { + func->start -= offset; + func->end = func->start + size; + } else { + /* + * This is just a label. So, we only need to + * consider that particular location. So, size + * is the size of one Aarch64 instruction. + */ + func->end = func->start + 4; + } + } + inited = true; + } + + for (func = special_functions; func->start; func++) { + if (pc >= func->start && pc < func->end) + return false; + } + return true; +} + +/* + * Check for the presence of features and conditions that render the stack + * trace unreliable. + * + * Once all such cases have been addressed, this function can aid live + * patching (and this comment can be removed). + */ +static void check_reliability(struct stackframe *frame) +{ + /* + * If the stack trace has already been marked unreliable, just return. + */ + if (!frame->reliable) + return; + + /* + * First, make sure that the return address is a proper kernel text + * address. A NULL or invalid return address probably means there's + * some generated code which __kernel_text_address() doesn't know + * about. Mark the stack trace as not reliable. + */ + if (!__kernel_text_address(frame->pc)) { + frame->reliable = false; + return; + } + + /* + * Check the reliability of the return PC's function. + */ + if (!is_reliable_function(frame->pc)) + frame->reliable = false; +} + /* * AArch64 PCS assigns the frame pointer to x29. * @@ -108,6 +186,8 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame) frame->pc = ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(frame->pc); + check_reliability(frame); + return 0; } NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_frame); -- 2.25.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel