From: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
To: oleg@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, paul@paul-moore.com,
eparis@redhat.com, linux-audit@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhe.he@windriver.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: ptrace: Add is_syscall_success to handle compat
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 18:35:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210423103533.30121-1-zhe.he@windriver.com> (raw)
The general version of is_syscall_success does not handle 32-bit
compatible case, which would cause 32-bit negative return code to be
recoganized as a positive number later and seen as a "success".
Since syscall_get_return_value is defined in syscall.h, implementing
is_syscall_success in ptrace.h would introduce build failure due to
recursive inclusion of some basic headers like mutex.h. Let's put the
implementation to ptrace.c
Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
---
v1 to v2: Call syscall_get_return_value to reduce code duplication
arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h | 3 +++
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
index e58bca832dff..3c415e9e5d85 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
@@ -328,6 +328,9 @@ static inline void regs_set_return_value(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long rc)
regs->regs[0] = rc;
}
+extern inline int is_syscall_success(struct pt_regs *regs);
+#define is_syscall_success(regs) is_syscall_success(regs)
+
/**
* regs_get_kernel_argument() - get Nth function argument in kernel
* @regs: pt_regs of that context
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
index 170f42fd6101..2c84255e1e41 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -1909,3 +1909,8 @@ int valid_user_regs(struct user_pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task)
else
return valid_native_regs(regs);
}
+
+inline int is_syscall_success(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ return !IS_ERR_VALUE(syscall_get_return_value(current, regs));
+}
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2021-04-23 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-23 10:35 He Zhe [this message]
2021-04-23 10:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: syscall.h: Add sign extension handling in syscall_get_return_value for compat He Zhe
2021-05-05 17:30 ` Mark Rutland
2021-04-23 10:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] audit: Use syscall_get_return_value to get syscall return code in audit_syscall_exit He Zhe
2021-05-10 22:38 ` Paul Moore
2021-05-11 3:19 ` He Zhe
2021-05-11 14:51 ` Paul Moore
2021-05-12 8:43 ` He Zhe
2021-05-14 20:33 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210423103533.30121-1-zhe.he@windriver.com \
--to=zhe.he@windriver.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).