From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, kernel-team@android.com Subject: [PATCH v6 11/21] sched: Split the guts of sched_setaffinity() into a helper function Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 10:47:15 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210518094725.7701-12-will@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210518094725.7701-1-will@kernel.org> In preparation for replaying user affinity requests using a saved mask, split sched_setaffinity() up so that the initial task lookup and security checks are only performed when the request is coming directly from userspace. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> --- kernel/sched/core.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 9512623d5a60..808bbe669a6d 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -6788,9 +6788,61 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(sched_getattr, pid_t, pid, struct sched_attr __user *, uattr, return retval; } -long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask) +static int +__sched_setaffinity(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask) { + int retval; cpumask_var_t cpus_allowed, new_mask; + + if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpus_allowed, GFP_KERNEL)) + return -ENOMEM; + + if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&new_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) + return -ENOMEM; + + cpuset_cpus_allowed(p, cpus_allowed); + cpumask_and(new_mask, mask, cpus_allowed); + + /* + * Since bandwidth control happens on root_domain basis, + * if admission test is enabled, we only admit -deadline + * tasks allowed to run on all the CPUs in the task's + * root_domain. + */ +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP + if (task_has_dl_policy(p) && dl_bandwidth_enabled()) { + rcu_read_lock(); + if (!cpumask_subset(task_rq(p)->rd->span, new_mask)) { + retval = -EBUSY; + rcu_read_unlock(); + goto out_free_masks; + } + rcu_read_unlock(); + } +#endif +again: + retval = __set_cpus_allowed_ptr(p, new_mask, SCA_CHECK); + if (retval) + goto out_free_masks; + + cpuset_cpus_allowed(p, cpus_allowed); + if (!cpumask_subset(new_mask, cpus_allowed)) { + /* + * We must have raced with a concurrent cpuset update. + * Just reset the cpumask to the cpuset's cpus_allowed. + */ + cpumask_copy(new_mask, cpus_allowed); + goto again; + } + +out_free_masks: + free_cpumask_var(new_mask); + free_cpumask_var(cpus_allowed); + return retval; +} + +long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask) +{ struct task_struct *p; int retval; @@ -6810,68 +6862,22 @@ long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask) retval = -EINVAL; goto out_put_task; } - if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpus_allowed, GFP_KERNEL)) { - retval = -ENOMEM; - goto out_put_task; - } - if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&new_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) { - retval = -ENOMEM; - goto out_free_cpus_allowed; - } - retval = -EPERM; + if (!check_same_owner(p)) { rcu_read_lock(); if (!ns_capable(__task_cred(p)->user_ns, CAP_SYS_NICE)) { rcu_read_unlock(); - goto out_free_new_mask; + retval = -EPERM; + goto out_put_task; } rcu_read_unlock(); } retval = security_task_setscheduler(p); if (retval) - goto out_free_new_mask; - - - cpuset_cpus_allowed(p, cpus_allowed); - cpumask_and(new_mask, in_mask, cpus_allowed); - - /* - * Since bandwidth control happens on root_domain basis, - * if admission test is enabled, we only admit -deadline - * tasks allowed to run on all the CPUs in the task's - * root_domain. - */ -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP - if (task_has_dl_policy(p) && dl_bandwidth_enabled()) { - rcu_read_lock(); - if (!cpumask_subset(task_rq(p)->rd->span, new_mask)) { - retval = -EBUSY; - rcu_read_unlock(); - goto out_free_new_mask; - } - rcu_read_unlock(); - } -#endif -again: - retval = __set_cpus_allowed_ptr(p, new_mask, SCA_CHECK); + goto out_put_task; - if (!retval) { - cpuset_cpus_allowed(p, cpus_allowed); - if (!cpumask_subset(new_mask, cpus_allowed)) { - /* - * We must have raced with a concurrent cpuset - * update. Just reset the cpus_allowed to the - * cpuset's cpus_allowed - */ - cpumask_copy(new_mask, cpus_allowed); - goto again; - } - } -out_free_new_mask: - free_cpumask_var(new_mask); -out_free_cpus_allowed: - free_cpumask_var(cpus_allowed); + retval = __sched_setaffinity(p, in_mask); out_put_task: put_task_struct(p); return retval; -- 2.31.1.751.gd2f1c929bd-goog _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-18 10:02 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-18 9:47 [PATCH v6 00/21] Add support for 32-bit tasks on asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 01/21] arm64: cpuinfo: Split AArch32 registers out into a separate struct Will Deacon 2021-05-21 10:47 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 02/21] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support Will Deacon 2021-05-21 10:25 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-05-24 12:05 ` Will Deacon 2021-05-24 13:49 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-05-21 10:41 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-05-24 12:09 ` Will Deacon 2021-05-24 13:46 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-05-21 15:22 ` Qais Yousef 2021-05-24 20:21 ` Will Deacon 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 03/21] KVM: arm64: Kill 32-bit vCPUs on systems with mismatched " Will Deacon 2021-05-21 10:47 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 04/21] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs Will Deacon 2021-05-21 10:55 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 05/21] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs Will Deacon 2021-05-21 11:00 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 06/21] sched: Introduce task_cpu_possible_mask() to limit fallback rq selection Will Deacon 2021-05-21 16:03 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-05-24 12:17 ` Will Deacon 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 07/21] cpuset: Don't use the cpu_possible_mask as a last resort for cgroup v1 Will Deacon 2021-05-21 17:39 ` Qais Yousef 2021-05-24 20:21 ` Will Deacon 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 08/21] cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus() Will Deacon 2021-05-21 16:25 ` Qais Yousef 2021-05-24 21:09 ` Will Deacon 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 09/21] sched: Reject CPU affinity changes based on task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 10/21] sched: Introduce task_struct::user_cpus_ptr to track requested affinity Will Deacon 2021-05-18 9:47 ` Will Deacon [this message] 2021-05-21 16:41 ` [PATCH v6 11/21] sched: Split the guts of sched_setaffinity() into a helper function Qais Yousef 2021-05-24 21:16 ` Will Deacon 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 12/21] sched: Allow task CPU affinity to be restricted on asymmetric systems Will Deacon 2021-05-21 17:11 ` Qais Yousef 2021-05-24 21:43 ` Will Deacon 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 13/21] sched: Admit forcefully-affined tasks into SCHED_DEADLINE Will Deacon 2021-05-18 10:20 ` Quentin Perret 2021-05-18 10:28 ` Will Deacon 2021-05-18 10:48 ` Quentin Perret 2021-05-18 10:59 ` Will Deacon 2021-05-18 13:19 ` Quentin Perret 2021-05-20 9:13 ` Juri Lelli 2021-05-20 10:16 ` Will Deacon 2021-05-20 10:33 ` Quentin Perret 2021-05-20 12:38 ` Juri Lelli 2021-05-20 12:38 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira 2021-05-20 15:06 ` Dietmar Eggemann 2021-05-20 16:00 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira 2021-05-20 17:55 ` Dietmar Eggemann 2021-05-20 18:03 ` Will Deacon 2021-05-21 11:26 ` Dietmar Eggemann 2021-05-20 18:01 ` Will Deacon 2021-05-21 5:25 ` Juri Lelli 2021-05-21 8:15 ` Quentin Perret 2021-05-21 8:39 ` Juri Lelli 2021-05-21 10:37 ` Will Deacon 2021-05-21 11:23 ` Dietmar Eggemann 2021-05-21 13:02 ` Quentin Perret 2021-05-21 14:04 ` Juri Lelli 2021-05-21 17:47 ` Dietmar Eggemann 2021-05-21 13:00 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira 2021-05-21 13:12 ` Quentin Perret 2021-05-24 20:47 ` Will Deacon 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 14/21] freezer: Add frozen_or_skipped() helper function Will Deacon 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 15/21] sched: Defer wakeup in ttwu() for unschedulable frozen tasks Will Deacon 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 16/21] arm64: Implement task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon 2021-05-24 14:57 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 17/21] arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon 2021-05-24 15:02 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 18/21] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system Will Deacon 2021-05-24 15:46 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-05-24 20:32 ` Will Deacon 2021-05-25 9:43 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 19/21] arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon 2021-05-24 15:47 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 20/21] arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores Will Deacon 2021-05-24 15:47 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-05-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v6 21/21] Documentation: arm64: describe asymmetric 32-bit support Will Deacon 2021-05-21 17:37 ` Qais Yousef 2021-05-24 21:46 ` Will Deacon 2021-05-24 16:22 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-05-21 17:45 ` [PATCH v6 00/21] Add support for 32-bit tasks on asymmetric AArch32 systems Qais Yousef 2021-05-24 22:08 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210518094725.7701-12-will@kernel.org \ --to=will@kernel.org \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \ --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \ --cc=kernel-team@android.com \ --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \ --cc=maz@kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \ --cc=qperret@google.com \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=surenb@google.com \ --cc=tj@kernel.org \ --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v6 11/21] sched: Split the guts of sched_setaffinity() into a helper function' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).