linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	<linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mtd: spinand: use the spi-mem poll status APIs
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 13:28:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210518132850.1558e46b@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210518093951.23136-3-patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>

On Tue, 18 May 2021 11:39:50 +0200
<patrice.chotard@foss.st.com> wrote:

> From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
> 
> Make use of spi-mem poll status APIs to let advanced controllers
> optimize wait operations.

This should also fix the high CPU usage you were reporting for those
that don't have a dedicated STATUS poll block logic, which is great!

> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
>   - Add initial_delay_us and polling_delay_us parameters to spinand_wait()
>   - Add SPINAND_READ/WRITE/ERASE/RESET_INITIAL_DELAY_US and
>     SPINAND_READ/WRITE/ERASE/RESET_POLL_DELAY_US defines.
> 
> Changes in v2:
>   - non-offload case is now managed by spi_mem_poll_status()
> 
>  drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  include/linux/mtd/spinand.h | 11 ++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> index 17f63f95f4a2..ef2a692ab5b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> @@ -473,20 +473,26 @@ static int spinand_erase_op(struct spinand_device *spinand,
>  	return spi_mem_exec_op(spinand->spimem, &op);
>  }
>  
> -static int spinand_wait(struct spinand_device *spinand, u8 *s)
> +static int spinand_wait(struct spinand_device *spinand,
> +			unsigned long initial_delay_us,
> +			unsigned long poll_delay_us,
> +			u8 *s)
>  {
> -	unsigned long timeo =  jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(400);
> +	struct spi_mem_op op = SPINAND_GET_FEATURE_OP(REG_STATUS,
> +						      spinand->scratchbuf);
>  	u8 status;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	do {
> -		ret = spinand_read_status(spinand, &status);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> +	ret = spi_mem_poll_status(spinand->spimem, &op, STATUS_BUSY, 0,
> +				  initial_delay_us,
> +				  poll_delay_us,
> +				  SPINAND_STATUS_TIMEOUT_MS);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
>  
> -		if (!(status & STATUS_BUSY))
> -			goto out;
> -	} while (time_before(jiffies, timeo));
> +	status = *spinand->scratchbuf;
> +	if (!(status & STATUS_BUSY))
> +		goto out;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Extra read, just in case the STATUS_READY bit has changed
> @@ -526,7 +532,10 @@ static int spinand_reset_op(struct spinand_device *spinand)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	return spinand_wait(spinand, NULL);
> +	return spinand_wait(spinand,
> +			    SPINAND_RESET_INITIAL_DELAY_US,
> +			    SPINAND_RESET_POLL_DELAY_US,
> +			    NULL);
>  }
>  
>  static int spinand_lock_block(struct spinand_device *spinand, u8 lock)
> @@ -549,7 +558,10 @@ static int spinand_read_page(struct spinand_device *spinand,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	ret = spinand_wait(spinand, &status);
> +	ret = spinand_wait(spinand,
> +			   SPINAND_READ_INITIAL_DELAY_US,
> +			   SPINAND_READ_POLL_DELAY_US,
> +			   &status);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> @@ -585,7 +597,10 @@ static int spinand_write_page(struct spinand_device *spinand,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	ret = spinand_wait(spinand, &status);
> +	ret = spinand_wait(spinand,
> +			   SPINAND_WRITE_INITIAL_DELAY_US,
> +			   SPINAND_WRITE_POLL_DELAY_US,
> +			   &status);
>  	if (!ret && (status & STATUS_PROG_FAILED))
>  		return -EIO;
>  
> @@ -768,7 +783,11 @@ static int spinand_erase(struct nand_device *nand, const struct nand_pos *pos)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	ret = spinand_wait(spinand, &status);
> +	ret = spinand_wait(spinand,
> +			   SPINAND_ERASE_INITIAL_DELAY_US,
> +			   SPINAND_ERASE_POLL_DELAY_US,
> +			   &status);
> +
>  	if (!ret && (status & STATUS_ERASE_FAILED))
>  		ret = -EIO;
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h b/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h
> index 6bb92f26833e..180c1fa64e62 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h
> @@ -169,7 +169,16 @@
>  struct spinand_op;
>  struct spinand_device;
>  
> -#define SPINAND_MAX_ID_LEN	4
> +#define SPINAND_MAX_ID_LEN		4
> +#define SPINAND_READ_INITIAL_DELAY_US	6
> +#define SPINAND_READ_POLL_DELAY_US	5
> +#define SPINAND_RESET_INITIAL_DELAY_US	5
> +#define SPINAND_RESET_POLL_DELAY_US	5
> +#define SPINAND_WRITE_INITIAL_DELAY_US	75
> +#define SPINAND_WRITE_POLL_DELAY_US	15
> +#define SPINAND_ERASE_INITIAL_DELAY_US	250
> +#define SPINAND_ERASE_POLL_DELAY_US	50

Could you add a comment explaining where those numbers come from?

> +#define SPINAND_STATUS_TIMEOUT_MS	400

I would name that one SPINAND_WAITRDY_TIMEOUT_MS.

>  
>  /**
>   * struct spinand_id - SPI NAND id structure


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-18 11:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-18  9:39 [PATCH v3 0/3] MTD: spinand: Add spi_mem_poll_status() support patrice.chotard
2021-05-18  9:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] spi: spi-mem: add automatic poll status functions patrice.chotard
2021-05-18 11:30   ` Boris Brezillon
2021-05-18 11:50     ` Patrice CHOTARD
2021-05-18 11:40   ` Boris Brezillon
2021-05-18 11:54     ` Patrice CHOTARD
2021-05-18  9:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mtd: spinand: use the spi-mem poll status APIs patrice.chotard
2021-05-18 11:28   ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2021-05-18 11:50     ` Patrice CHOTARD
2021-05-18  9:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] spi: stm32-qspi: add automatic poll status feature patrice.chotard
2021-05-18 11:39   ` Boris Brezillon
2021-05-18 11:53     ` Patrice CHOTARD
2021-05-18 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] MTD: spinand: Add spi_mem_poll_status() support Patrice CHOTARD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210518132850.1558e46b@collabora.com \
    --to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.kerello@foss.st.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=patrice.chotard@foss.st.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).