From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com Subject: [PATCH v2 15/19] arm64: entry: split bad stack entry Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 13:38:58 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210519123902.2452-16-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210519123902.2452-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> We'd like to keep all the entry sequencing in entry-common.c, as this will allow us to ensure this is all consistent, and free from any unsound instrumentation. Currently handle_bad_stack() performs the NMI entry sequence in traps.c. Let's split the low-level entry sequence from the reporting, moving the former to entry-common.c and keeping the latter in traps.c. To make it clear that reporting function never returns, it is renamed to panic_bad_stack(). Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/exception.h | 4 ++++ arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 9 +++++++++ arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 6 +----- 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/exception.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/exception.h index 40a3a20dca1c..952402ca9533 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/exception.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/exception.h @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ static inline u32 disr_to_esr(u64 disr) return esr; } +asmlinkage void handle_bad_stack(struct pt_regs *regs); + asmlinkage void el1t_64_sync_handler(struct pt_regs *regs); asmlinkage void el1t_64_irq_handler(struct pt_regs *regs); asmlinkage void el1t_64_fiq_handler(struct pt_regs *regs); @@ -74,4 +76,6 @@ void do_el0_svc(struct pt_regs *regs); void do_el0_svc_compat(struct pt_regs *regs); void do_ptrauth_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr); void do_serror(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr); + +void panic_bad_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr, unsigned long far); #endif /* __ASM_EXCEPTION_H */ diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c index 6f1caec913a9..801c7d479d47 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c @@ -104,6 +104,15 @@ void noinstr arm64_exit_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs) __nmi_exit(); } +asmlinkage void noinstr handle_bad_stack(struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + unsigned int esr = read_sysreg(esr_el1); + unsigned long far = read_sysreg(far_el1); + + arm64_enter_nmi(regs); + panic_bad_stack(regs, esr, far); +} + static void noinstr enter_el1_irq_or_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs) { if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI) && !interrupts_enabled(regs)) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c index 7def18ff02e2..4d157d2d8f67 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c @@ -763,15 +763,11 @@ void bad_el0_sync(struct pt_regs *regs, int reason, unsigned int esr) DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long [OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE/sizeof(long)], overflow_stack) __aligned(16); -asmlinkage void noinstr handle_bad_stack(struct pt_regs *regs) +void panic_bad_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr, unsigned long far) { unsigned long tsk_stk = (unsigned long)current->stack; unsigned long irq_stk = (unsigned long)this_cpu_read(irq_stack_ptr); unsigned long ovf_stk = (unsigned long)this_cpu_ptr(overflow_stack); - unsigned int esr = read_sysreg(esr_el1); - unsigned long far = read_sysreg(far_el1); - - arm64_enter_nmi(regs); console_verbose(); pr_emerg("Insufficient stack space to handle exception!"); -- 2.11.0 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-19 13:11 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-19 12:38 [PATCH v2 00/19] arm64: entry: migrate more code to C Mark Rutland 2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] arm64: remove redundant local_daif_mask() in bad_mode() Mark Rutland 2021-05-21 10:39 ` Joey Gouly 2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 02/19] arm64: entry: unmask IRQ+FIQ after EL0 handling Mark Rutland 2021-05-25 16:45 ` Joey Gouly 2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 03/19] arm64: entry: convert SError handlers to C Mark Rutland 2021-05-25 13:38 ` Joey Gouly 2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 04/19] arm64: entry: move arm64_preempt_schedule_irq to entry-common.c Mark Rutland 2021-05-21 11:00 ` Joey Gouly 2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 05/19] arm64: entry: move preempt logic to C Mark Rutland 2021-05-25 12:50 ` Joey Gouly 2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 06/19] arm64: entry: add a call_on_irq_stack helper Mark Rutland 2021-05-19 14:46 ` Mark Rutland 2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] arm64: entry: convert IRQ+FIQ handlers to C Mark Rutland 2021-05-21 13:19 ` Joey Gouly 2021-05-21 15:23 ` Mark Rutland 2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 08/19] arm64: entry: organise entry handlers consistently Mark Rutland 2021-05-21 16:04 ` Joey Gouly 2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 09/19] arm64: entry: organise entry vectors consistently Mark Rutland 2021-05-21 16:07 ` Joey Gouly 2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] arm64: entry: consolidate EL1 exception returns Mark Rutland 2021-05-21 16:22 ` Joey Gouly 2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] arm64: entry: move bad_mode() to entry-common.c Mark Rutland 2021-05-21 16:46 ` Joey Gouly 2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 12/19] arm64: entry: improve bad_mode() Mark Rutland 2021-05-21 17:02 ` Joey Gouly 2021-05-21 17:10 ` Mark Rutland 2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] arm64: entry: template the entry asm functions Mark Rutland 2021-05-21 17:16 ` Joey Gouly 2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 14/19] arm64: entry: handle all vectors with C Mark Rutland 2021-05-21 15:59 ` Joey Gouly 2021-05-21 16:41 ` Mark Rutland 2021-05-19 12:38 ` Mark Rutland [this message] 2021-05-25 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 15/19] arm64: entry: split bad stack entry Joey Gouly 2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 16/19] arm64: entry: split SDEI entry Mark Rutland 2021-05-25 11:49 ` Joey Gouly 2021-05-19 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 17/19] arm64: entry: make NMI entry/exit functions static Mark Rutland 2021-05-21 17:21 ` Joey Gouly 2021-05-19 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] arm64: entry: don't instrument entry code with KCOV Mark Rutland 2021-05-19 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 19/19] arm64: idle: don't instrument idle " Mark Rutland
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210519123902.2452-16-mark.rutland@arm.com \ --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=james.morse@arm.com \ --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=maz@kernel.org \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 15/19] arm64: entry: split bad stack entry' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).