linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
	joey.gouly@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/19] arm64: entry: unmask IRQ+FIQ after EL0 handling
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 13:38:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210519123902.2452-3-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210519123902.2452-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>

For non-fatal exceptions taken from EL0, we expect that at some point
during exception handling it is possible to return to a regular process
context with all exceptions unmasked (e.g. as we do in
do_notify_resume()), and we generally aim to unmask exceptions wherever
possible.

While handling SError and debug exceptions from EL0, we need to leave
some exceptions masked during handling. Handling SError requires us to
mask SError (which also requires masking IRQ+FIQ), and handing debug
exceptions requires us to mask debug (which also requires masking
SError+IRQ+FIQ).

Once do_serror() or do_debug_exception() has returned, we no longer need
to mask exceptions, and can unmask them all, which is what we did prior
to commit:

  9034f6251572a474 ("arm64: Do not enable IRQs for ct_user_exit")

... where we had to mask IRQs as for context_tracking_user_exit()
expected IRQs to be masked.

Since then, we realised that our context tracking wasn't entirely
correct, and reworked the entry code to fix this. As of commit:

  23529049c6842382 ("arm64: entry: fix non-NMI user<->kernel transitions")

... we consistently call context_tracking_user_exit() later as part of
ret_to_user. Prior to this we can transiently unmask exceptions (e.g. as
part of do_notify_resume), and we always mask all exceptions prior to
calling context_tracking_user_exit().

Thus, there's no longer a reason to leave IRQs or FIQs masked at the end
of el0_dbg() or el0_error(), so let's bring these into line with other
EL0 exceptions handlers and unmask all exceptions after the handler is
finished.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S        | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
index 340d04e13617..02be1517e08f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static void noinstr el0_dbg(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long esr)
 
 	enter_from_user_mode();
 	do_debug_exception(far, esr, regs);
-	local_daif_restore(DAIF_PROCCTX_NOIRQ);
+	local_daif_restore(DAIF_PROCCTX);
 }
 
 static void noinstr el0_svc(struct pt_regs *regs)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
index 3513984a88bd..6b2f6f5c5bb8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ el0_error_naked:
 	mov	x0, sp
 	mov	x1, x25
 	bl	do_serror
-	enable_da
+	enable_daif
 	b	ret_to_user
 SYM_CODE_END(el0_error)
 
-- 
2.11.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-19 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-19 12:38 [PATCH v2 00/19] arm64: entry: migrate more code to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] arm64: remove redundant local_daif_mask() in bad_mode() Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 10:39   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2021-05-25 16:45   ` [PATCH v2 02/19] arm64: entry: unmask IRQ+FIQ after EL0 handling Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 03/19] arm64: entry: convert SError handlers to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 13:38   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 04/19] arm64: entry: move arm64_preempt_schedule_irq to entry-common.c Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 11:00   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 05/19] arm64: entry: move preempt logic to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 12:50   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 06/19] arm64: entry: add a call_on_irq_stack helper Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 14:46   ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] arm64: entry: convert IRQ+FIQ handlers to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 13:19   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-21 15:23     ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 08/19] arm64: entry: organise entry handlers consistently Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 16:04   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 09/19] arm64: entry: organise entry vectors consistently Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 16:07   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] arm64: entry: consolidate EL1 exception returns Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 16:22   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] arm64: entry: move bad_mode() to entry-common.c Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 16:46   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 12/19] arm64: entry: improve bad_mode() Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 17:02   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-21 17:10     ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] arm64: entry: template the entry asm functions Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 17:16   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 14/19] arm64: entry: handle all vectors with C Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 15:59   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-21 16:41     ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 15/19] arm64: entry: split bad stack entry Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 11:25   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 16/19] arm64: entry: split SDEI entry Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 11:49   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 17/19] arm64: entry: make NMI entry/exit functions static Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 17:21   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] arm64: entry: don't instrument entry code with KCOV Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 19/19] arm64: idle: don't instrument idle " Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210519123902.2452-3-mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 02/19] arm64: entry: unmask IRQ+FIQ after EL0 handling' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).