linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
	joey.gouly@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/19] arm64: entry: move preempt logic to C
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 13:38:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210519123902.2452-6-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210519123902.2452-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>

Currently portions of our preempt logic are written in C while other
parts are written in assembly. There's no reason any of this needs to
live in assembly, so let's move the rest of the lgoic to C. At the same
time, let's make the comment a bit clearer.

Other than the increased lockdep coverage there should be no functional
change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S        | 13 -------------
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
index 1fe60578e556..dbe0bb09fe86 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
@@ -121,6 +121,18 @@ asmlinkage void __sched arm64_preempt_schedule_irq(void)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
 
+	if (preempt_count() != 0)
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * DAIF.DA are cleared at the start of IRQ/FIQ handling, and when GIC
+	 * priority masking is used the GIC irqchip driver will clear DAIF.IF
+	 * using gic_arch_enable_irqs() for normal IRQs. If anything is set in
+	 * DAIF we must have handled an NMI, so skip preemption.
+	 */
+	if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking() && read_sysreg(daif))
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * Preempting a task from an IRQ means we leave copies of PSTATE
 	 * on the stack. cpufeature's enable calls may modify PSTATE, but
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
index 656f3129bfef..8c7ddd651756 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -561,20 +561,7 @@ tsk	.req	x28		// current thread_info
 	irq_handler	\handler
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPTION
-	ldr	x24, [tsk, #TSK_TI_PREEMPT]	// get preempt count
-alternative_if ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING
-	/*
-	 * DA were cleared at start of handling, and IF are cleared by
-	 * the GIC irqchip driver using gic_arch_enable_irqs() for
-	 * normal IRQs. If anything is set, it means we come back from
-	 * an NMI instead of a normal IRQ, so skip preemption
-	 */
-	mrs	x0, daif
-	orr	x24, x24, x0
-alternative_else_nop_endif
-	cbnz	x24, 1f				// preempt count != 0 || NMI return path
 	bl	arm64_preempt_schedule_irq	// irq en/disable is done inside
-1:
 #endif
 
 	mov	x0, sp
-- 
2.11.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-19 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-19 12:38 [PATCH v2 00/19] arm64: entry: migrate more code " Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] arm64: remove redundant local_daif_mask() in bad_mode() Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 10:39   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 02/19] arm64: entry: unmask IRQ+FIQ after EL0 handling Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 16:45   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 03/19] arm64: entry: convert SError handlers to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 13:38   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 04/19] arm64: entry: move arm64_preempt_schedule_irq to entry-common.c Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 11:00   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2021-05-25 12:50   ` [PATCH v2 05/19] arm64: entry: move preempt logic to C Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 06/19] arm64: entry: add a call_on_irq_stack helper Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 14:46   ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] arm64: entry: convert IRQ+FIQ handlers to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 13:19   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-21 15:23     ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 08/19] arm64: entry: organise entry handlers consistently Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 16:04   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 09/19] arm64: entry: organise entry vectors consistently Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 16:07   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] arm64: entry: consolidate EL1 exception returns Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 16:22   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] arm64: entry: move bad_mode() to entry-common.c Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 16:46   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 12/19] arm64: entry: improve bad_mode() Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 17:02   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-21 17:10     ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] arm64: entry: template the entry asm functions Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 17:16   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 14/19] arm64: entry: handle all vectors with C Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 15:59   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-21 16:41     ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 15/19] arm64: entry: split bad stack entry Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 11:25   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 16/19] arm64: entry: split SDEI entry Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 11:49   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 17/19] arm64: entry: make NMI entry/exit functions static Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 17:21   ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] arm64: entry: don't instrument entry code with KCOV Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 19/19] arm64: idle: don't instrument idle " Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210519123902.2452-6-mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 05/19] arm64: entry: move preempt logic to C' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).