From: Joe Richey <joerichey94@gmail.com> To: trivial@kernel.org Cc: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>, Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>, Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Don't use BIT() macro in UAPI headers Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 03:43:40 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210520104343.317119-4-joerichey94@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210520104343.317119-1-joerichey94@gmail.com> From: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com> A previous patch [1] used the BIT() macro to define PSCI_1_0_OS_INITIATED in the UAPI header. This macro is defined in the kernel but not in the UAPI headers. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/949966/ Signed-off-by: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com> --- include/uapi/linux/psci.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/psci.h b/include/uapi/linux/psci.h index 2fcad1dd0b0e..d7da8059cbbe 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/psci.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/psci.h @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ #define PSCI_1_0_FEATURES_CPU_SUSPEND_PF_MASK \ (0x1 << PSCI_1_0_FEATURES_CPU_SUSPEND_PF_SHIFT) -#define PSCI_1_0_OS_INITIATED BIT(0) +#define PSCI_1_0_OS_INITIATED (1 << 0) #define PSCI_1_0_SUSPEND_MODE_PC 0 #define PSCI_1_0_SUSPEND_MODE_OSI 1 -- 2.31.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-20 10:46 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-20 10:43 [PATCH 0/6] " Joe Richey 2021-05-20 10:43 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/elf: " Joe Richey 2021-05-20 10:43 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: X86: " Joe Richey 2021-05-20 15:46 ` Sean Christopherson 2021-05-20 10:43 ` Joe Richey [this message] 2021-05-20 10:43 ` [PATCH 4/6] uacce: " Joe Richey 2021-05-20 10:43 ` [PATCH 5/6] media: vicodec: " Joe Richey 2021-05-20 10:43 ` [PATCH 6/6] tools headers UAPI: Sync pkt_sched.h with the kernel sources Joe Richey 2021-05-20 11:07 ` [PATCH 0/6] Don't use BIT() macro in UAPI headers Borislav Petkov 2021-05-20 11:50 ` Joseph Richey 2021-05-20 15:59 ` Borislav Petkov 2021-05-20 15:50 ` Sean Christopherson 2021-05-20 11:11 ` Mark Rutland 2021-05-20 11:40 ` Joseph Richey 2021-05-20 12:09 ` Paolo Bonzini 2021-05-20 15:47 ` Sean Christopherson 2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] " Joe Richey 2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] x86/elf: Use _BITUL() " Joe Richey 2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: X86: " Joe Richey 2021-05-24 12:28 ` Paolo Bonzini 2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] drivers: firmware: psci: " Joe Richey 2021-05-21 13:25 ` Mark Rutland 2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] uacce: " Joe Richey 2021-05-21 13:56 ` Zhangfei Gao 2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] media: vicodec: " Joe Richey 2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] tools headers UAPI: Sync pkt_sched.h with the kernel sources Joe Richey 2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: suggest _BITULL() and _BITUL() for UAPI headers Joe Richey 2021-05-21 14:45 ` Joe Perches 2021-05-24 11:46 ` [PATCH 0/6] Don't use BIT() macro in " Christoph Hellwig 2021-05-24 12:29 ` Mark Rutland 2021-05-24 16:34 ` David Laight
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210520104343.317119-4-joerichey94@gmail.com \ --to=joerichey94@gmail.com \ --cc=bp@alien8.de \ --cc=hpa@zytor.com \ --cc=joerichey@google.com \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=trivial@kernel.org \ --cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ --cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Don'\''t use BIT() macro in UAPI headers' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).