From: Joe Richey <joerichey94@gmail.com>
To: trivial@kernel.org
Cc: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>,
Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Don't use BIT() macro in UAPI headers
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 03:43:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210520104343.317119-4-joerichey94@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210520104343.317119-1-joerichey94@gmail.com>
From: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com>
A previous patch [1] used the BIT() macro to define
PSCI_1_0_OS_INITIATED in the UAPI header.
This macro is defined in the kernel but not in the UAPI headers.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/949966/
Signed-off-by: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com>
---
include/uapi/linux/psci.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/psci.h b/include/uapi/linux/psci.h
index 2fcad1dd0b0e..d7da8059cbbe 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/psci.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/psci.h
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@
#define PSCI_1_0_FEATURES_CPU_SUSPEND_PF_MASK \
(0x1 << PSCI_1_0_FEATURES_CPU_SUSPEND_PF_SHIFT)
-#define PSCI_1_0_OS_INITIATED BIT(0)
+#define PSCI_1_0_OS_INITIATED (1 << 0)
#define PSCI_1_0_SUSPEND_MODE_PC 0
#define PSCI_1_0_SUSPEND_MODE_OSI 1
--
2.31.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-20 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-20 10:43 [PATCH 0/6] Don't use BIT() macro in UAPI headers Joe Richey
2021-05-20 10:43 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/elf: " Joe Richey
2021-05-20 10:43 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: X86: " Joe Richey
2021-05-20 15:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-20 10:43 ` Joe Richey [this message]
2021-05-20 10:43 ` [PATCH 4/6] uacce: " Joe Richey
2021-05-20 10:43 ` [PATCH 5/6] media: vicodec: " Joe Richey
2021-05-20 10:43 ` [PATCH 6/6] tools headers UAPI: Sync pkt_sched.h with the kernel sources Joe Richey
2021-05-20 11:07 ` [PATCH 0/6] Don't use BIT() macro in UAPI headers Borislav Petkov
2021-05-20 11:50 ` Joseph Richey
2021-05-20 15:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-05-20 15:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-20 11:11 ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-20 11:40 ` Joseph Richey
2021-05-20 12:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-20 15:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] " Joe Richey
2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] x86/elf: Use _BITUL() " Joe Richey
2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: X86: " Joe Richey
2021-05-24 12:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] drivers: firmware: psci: " Joe Richey
2021-05-21 13:25 ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] uacce: " Joe Richey
2021-05-21 13:56 ` Zhangfei Gao
2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] media: vicodec: " Joe Richey
2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] tools headers UAPI: Sync pkt_sched.h with the kernel sources Joe Richey
2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: suggest _BITULL() and _BITUL() for UAPI headers Joe Richey
2021-05-21 14:45 ` Joe Perches
2021-05-24 11:46 ` [PATCH 0/6] Don't use BIT() macro in " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-24 12:29 ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-24 16:34 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210520104343.317119-4-joerichey94@gmail.com \
--to=joerichey94@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joerichey@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=trivial@kernel.org \
--cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).