From: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
james.morse@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, nd@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/19] arm64: entry: improve bad_mode()
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 18:02:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210521170221.GI35816@e124191.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210519123902.2452-13-mark.rutland@arm.com>
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 01:38:55PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Our use of bad_mode() has a few rough edges:
>
> * AArch64 doesn't use the term "mode", and refers to "Execution
> states", "Exception levels", and "Selected stack pointer".
>
> * We log the exception type (SYNC/IRQ/FIQ/SError), but not the actual
> "mode" (though this can be deocded from the SPSR value).
>
> * We use bad_mode() as a second-level handler for unexpected synchronous
> exceptions, where the "mode" is legitimate, but the specific exception
> is not.
>
> * We dump the ESR value, but call this "code", and so it's not clear to
> all readers that this is the ESR.
>
> ... and all of this can be someqhat opaque to those who aren't extremely
> familiar with the code.
typo: someqhat -> somewhat
>
> Let's make this a bit clearer by having bad_mode() log "Unhandled
> ${TYPE} exception" rather than "Bad mode in ${TYPE} handler", using
> "ESR" rather than "code", and having the final panic() log "Unhandled
> exception" rather than "Bad mode".
>
> In future we'd like to log the specific architectural vector rather than
> just the type of exception, so we also split the core of basd_mode() out
typo: basd_mode -> bad_mode
> into a helper called __panic_unhandled(), which takes the vector as a
> string argument.
>
Reviewed-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-21 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-19 12:38 [PATCH v2 00/19] arm64: entry: migrate more code to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] arm64: remove redundant local_daif_mask() in bad_mode() Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 10:39 ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 02/19] arm64: entry: unmask IRQ+FIQ after EL0 handling Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 16:45 ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 03/19] arm64: entry: convert SError handlers to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 13:38 ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 04/19] arm64: entry: move arm64_preempt_schedule_irq to entry-common.c Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 11:00 ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 05/19] arm64: entry: move preempt logic to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 12:50 ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 06/19] arm64: entry: add a call_on_irq_stack helper Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 14:46 ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] arm64: entry: convert IRQ+FIQ handlers to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 13:19 ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-21 15:23 ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 08/19] arm64: entry: organise entry handlers consistently Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 16:04 ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 09/19] arm64: entry: organise entry vectors consistently Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 16:07 ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] arm64: entry: consolidate EL1 exception returns Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 16:22 ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] arm64: entry: move bad_mode() to entry-common.c Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 16:46 ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 12/19] arm64: entry: improve bad_mode() Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 17:02 ` Joey Gouly [this message]
2021-05-21 17:10 ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] arm64: entry: template the entry asm functions Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 17:16 ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 14/19] arm64: entry: handle all vectors with C Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 15:59 ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-21 16:41 ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 15/19] arm64: entry: split bad stack entry Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 11:25 ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 16/19] arm64: entry: split SDEI entry Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 11:49 ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 17/19] arm64: entry: make NMI entry/exit functions static Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 17:21 ` Joey Gouly
2021-05-19 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] arm64: entry: don't instrument entry code with KCOV Mark Rutland
2021-05-19 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 19/19] arm64: idle: don't instrument idle " Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210521170221.GI35816@e124191.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).