From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF80C47076 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 17:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38705608FE for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 17:54:59 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 38705608FE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Type: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date :Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=N/NjRVrqULrOnvMierAp+ahJyWcHH+VAuv5wzZn2jeU=; b=B0kjwWWRxm6aRIyAbNKuNzDGdA 15NXo/rDYLI8lkcNgx8jf9bF2s7M3VFfEVM3gr8j6BriRFBNOzDGJ3Pd+c/PTvX+zVOUo4Ps5+8Wv n7liuuS8raMDs7EEKo5VLPdif44kGTOzVN6fvkuDaenKyn7rjW8oc6epESLycbnDhJNBEjTeIazMY kXimmMeCAR5GMyMoC+pMMbExu7uqv78nn1H2HaNi+FkrZW61+6aPaL+09RqEa9db6kpL90roY0nvu 32Lgvw6GTU2ofnQt0f6aiNie91cUNtDSOkADi3C/Bhq6iitMQk4gx0nvd7suJVekyQfg5NANhMJbS X2AfkfWw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lk9L0-000csX-Nh; Fri, 21 May 2021 17:53:31 +0000 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lk9Kv-000crs-Gu for linux-arm-kernel@desiato.infradead.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 17:53:25 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=d4iEeT3kENazUfx6vj5fy6JPv4wS8jBR0cwrDXv+FYk=; b=Y0MKy9lOnM69DXrW+2jFr2qSLk 3nr3Gexjl3RTy+6WZBqs+zj73vNhd5zxQri+0cS3ZKM6RBe4RZPZPMkdyIfvbwvAN7HGS5zvsVvS3 JCZFrWqa0uQPmuusrxZXVtl2iC1YaohQX/rbAVPOyOka5Z4n6f0qAd7XOY7EW9msE5aaBzS+Rk8+i Cqx5CCfcD3mcMIuky2mGjODi5mNvSykB81ldjSkVM1Ze1//GMk95HiafUdw99goEAWlTFcaau3w6o cafgf0tnbTLPFy2hNmHf+ujvgkVzltwHSYJNSRT0dqlHXUbnLKCTlTzF6eWeflrroIz+5VEpTzNBq jK3fjGrg==; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lk9Ks-00HKmB-Rd for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 17:53:24 +0000 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B65DC608FE; Fri, 21 May 2021 17:53:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1621619602; bh=d4iEeT3kENazUfx6vj5fy6JPv4wS8jBR0cwrDXv+FYk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WggyX5pUYy1jsxw7nVsbfw7cZlt5OajIOd+gRsgSNRX/LokMp+maZhTvwQwBfeV7C PrLpRO5zbAKj2sbs1rrzeRg17b/qWLI6ak/nDhp4nl1eA298HJ8gFcK6HTYyZq/iAB qPnNHk5Lt8r4l/uixt4RgjfzdLcw8evif1M8UNUlThuoFukpWcARi5SqmXCAXG6ld4 7jL9irJQw33Tt9bf2a5RnL4gmH+3/gyHRCAfdDrD3BTeuCKX5kFK/Fv/bHSJaRFFkW ZQSEgLs3wowyzkveJNAQmsku6Llw6+fCSEuABO0yZ6z0Cc12VGB1cDToc6p/fCcqNR rSDHF/Rs8r0OQ== Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 18:53:18 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com, ardb@kernel.org, jthierry@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder Message-ID: <20210521175318.GF5825@sirena.org.uk> References: <68eeda61b3e9579d65698a884b26c8632025e503> <20210516040018.128105-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> <20210516040018.128105-2-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> <20210521161117.GB5825@sirena.org.uk> <20210521174242.GD5825@sirena.org.uk> <26c33633-029e-6374-16e6-e9418099da95@linux.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <26c33633-029e-6374-16e6-e9418099da95@linux.microsoft.com> X-Cookie: Do not write below this line. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210521_105322_933158_FA1FB7B9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.36 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8730599979482704253==" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --===============8730599979482704253== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1Ow488MNN9B9o/ov" Content-Disposition: inline --1Ow488MNN9B9o/ov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 12:47:13PM -0500, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote: > On 5/21/21 12:42 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > Like I say we may come up with some use for the flag in error cases in > > future so I'm not opposed to keeping the accounting there. > So, should I leave it the way it is now? Or should I not set reliable = false > for errors? Which one do you prefer? > Josh, > Are you OK with not flagging reliable = false for errors in unwind_frame()? I think it's fine to leave it as it is. --1Ow488MNN9B9o/ov Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmCn840ACgkQJNaLcl1U h9B64Af+PKOojLf3mxi8xJnWbYRZtZbrmPoHiSiT/enzT0Y/XjSubDQOp0pxbeJT ah0rvSPhTYWO7uUm2SmBcaWUN0eidHRotNWCvPadRISC6JwLGcS3qmAnTdZ8JNXE 4NT3oyLC8yAFI6vv5NXf9SwFW+puPPWS7quktVWiJ5Xb12vd+5x+n5lPcrMinImi 5sWIcINkCXrthJTudokrCtuaNLp0aDQVTwQTmLBQ7q2fjAxfiylvxi6J556/YUFQ UvtgW9zT7JjhFuEoeiO3/QekwUijHzelN0inaw0kX8rtaD3FrPqSI8JYaBXDEC4u /zkIcbJJEvSDyZG8v/yUD+CeN+9CwA== =yZ+q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1Ow488MNN9B9o/ov-- --===============8730599979482704253== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel --===============8730599979482704253==--