From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BDA3C47089 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 20:27:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FA9661360 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 20:27:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3FA9661360 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=74RjQsScFUArJQdUT2zdVEwCQcCIE6iJgv88nQv0jFw=; b=KbCtkVpSOwg5Cq uiabstFWSJO7z2bhzAUAlGBCOfJT5D0Q8QnFtgwxQNteHc+lma6f/v/YMOfLsbcpobxGbgB4T3D5a GJME9wKGnFo2E71bu+37HZe5hnF+zb9g8W8V5p1FERUdrmXCREnFk+67aYA85hlbOWiLk4ykWCP4t q0kvcQt09XscRlXpPH+IXZxu7y2uDOGBTLRioNAMaUn8j+PdF9XYbm3GTXuVMN0lzlSijzTwLnKSf 8kB+aY8uRbpo0k8+xgScr/+aiByxvX/bwGvMb+yCw9ybDYhY/EP8FRLVIXSdjIks/2AOvd+oi2gFR hOzgkfbqpL4j7DbQhFhw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lmMZu-009Jio-Uc; Thu, 27 May 2021 20:26:03 +0000 Received: from mail-oi1-f173.google.com ([209.85.167.173]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lmMZq-009Jh3-Os for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 27 May 2021 20:26:00 +0000 Received: by mail-oi1-f173.google.com with SMTP id z3so2034587oib.5 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 13:25:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=d80yU/ahixz8PlwCHjjGT73dCXWqG9MsiBJDbg1V8UM=; b=CAHGISkhAxys2Jx18Nd4MjXd/jvYk5ol/CNDQ07XWNt7pVM7AWtb9IqESEX4C3RFji nX3u9ajq4y7lF5c3CWQwFTgmkIW4/OE5ejY+ODVMXx6iVbshJ0dP+V4cv91W1EjxWIAE urzwAukSkYw27OISMghBLZd1kWf3/TbX1v/MkrDFJyv9J+91C6exF6otBw0sImo/9u0f /aL8NPYUKCnfzMUntYimRNK3Oe2qFo6UaXLv7/d0kopiKdFbuvTU0CWjiXH7xFdR3kln kxqMOjj7XkdpyCAahhFByJ7IhIfsBljF7bCCQwQEWvjkboLL0ba5/IVOztOaYV+8OCMU 8vnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FcpFTzfXwSuDgF+ZjzKde91cUM28EX/UeQlbxcAbSJwKKPYFl K4XjRF8sX4xh3HlacO55og== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzcHmM36bqnc111XjTTPeU8u0gD1R5gEnCCEUVspTHdoRK0OMh8gHMlgLDC0/ohrawc17E8dg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:128a:: with SMTP id a10mr6776116oiw.161.1622147156437; Thu, 27 May 2021 13:25:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org (24-155-109-49.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [24.155.109.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u201sm699720oia.10.2021.05.27.13.25.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 27 May 2021 13:25:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 1355340 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 27 May 2021 20:25:54 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 15:25:54 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Sudeep Holla Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Cristian Marussi , Kevin Hilman , Neil Armstrong , Jerome Brunet Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm, scpi: Move arm, scpi-shmem to json schema Message-ID: <20210527202554.GA1351447@robh.at.kernel.org> References: <20210526182807.548118-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20210526182807.548118-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210526182807.548118-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210527_132558_837084_AFC7190A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.65 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 07:28:00PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Move the SRAM and shared memory binding for SCPI into the existing > Generic on-chip SRAM. We just need to update the compatible list and > there-by remove the whole old text format binding for the same. > > Cc: Rob Herring > Cc: Kevin Hilman > Cc: Neil Armstrong > Cc: Jerome Brunet > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt | 15 --------------- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml | 1 + > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt > index bcd6c3ec471e..bcb8b3d61e68 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt > @@ -56,21 +56,6 @@ Sub-nodes > node. It can be non linear and hence provide the mapping of identifiers > into the clock-output-names array. > > -SRAM and Shared Memory for SCPI > -------------------------------- > - > -A small area of SRAM is reserved for SCPI communication between application > -processors and SCP. > - > -The properties should follow the generic mmio-sram description found in [3] > - > -Each sub-node represents the reserved area for SCPI. > - > -Required sub-node properties: > -- reg : The base offset and size of the reserved area with the SRAM > -- compatible : should be "arm,scp-shmem" for Non-secure SRAM based > + - arm,scpi-shmem Which is correct? There's not a single other occurrance in the kernel tree of either. Rob _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel