Hello Roman,

On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 02:10:35PM +0200, Roman Beranek wrote:
> On Tue May 25, 2021 at 6:41 PM CEST, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure Alexandre at the time reported that the instantiation of
> > the controller that he was using required waiting for the period to
> > complete before the output went to the disabled state. It's possible
> > that this was changed in subsequent versions of the IP, so perhaps we
> > need to distinguish based on compatible string?
> 
> I've got myself an A10 (sun4i) board to test my new patchset with and
> indeed the 2 cycles seem to be enough.
> 
> I have yet to write a cover letter for it though, expect it by Monday
> at the latest.

You didn't send an update here (or did I miss it?). Still I think it's
correct that the patch we're discussion here is not suiteable to be
merged as is and so I marked the patch as "Changes Requested" in
patchwork. Please speak up if you think that's wrong.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |