On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 04:52:22PM +0800, Jitao Shi wrote: > The clks "main" and "mm" are prepared in .probe() (and > unprepared in .remove()). This results in the clocks being on > during suspend which results in unnecessarily increased power > consumption. > > Remove the clock operations from .probe() and .remove(). > Add the clk_prepare_enable() in .config(). > Add the clk_disable_unprepare() in .disable(). > Remove the MT2701 double buffer comment. > > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi > --- > drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++------------------- > 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c > index 9b3ba401a3db..204d76beeb26 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c > @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct mtk_disp_pwm { > struct clk *clk_main; > struct clk *clk_mm; > void __iomem *base; > + bool enabled; > }; > > static inline struct mtk_disp_pwm *to_mtk_disp_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip) > @@ -74,6 +75,22 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, > u64 div, rate; > int err; > > + if (!mdp->enabled) { > + err = clk_prepare_enable(mdp->clk_main); > + if (err < 0) { > + dev_err(chip->dev, "Can't enable mdp->clk_main: %pe\n", > + ERR_PTR(err)); > + return err; > + } > + err = clk_prepare_enable(mdp->clk_mm); > + if (err < 0) { > + dev_err(chip->dev, "Can't enable mdp->clk_mm: %pe\n", > + ERR_PTR(err)); > + clk_disable_unprepare(mdp->clk_main); > + return err; > + } > + } > + The logic becomes a tad simpler if you prepare_enable unconditionally on entry and disable_unprepare on exit. Given that in the mdp->enabled == true the clocks are already on they are a noop in this case and the matching disable just decreases the usage count. > /* > * Find period, high_width and clk_div to suit duty_ns and period_ns. > * Calculate proper div value to keep period value in the bound. > @@ -87,9 +104,13 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, > rate = clk_get_rate(mdp->clk_main); > clk_div = div_u64(rate * period_ns, NSEC_PER_SEC) >> > PWM_PERIOD_BIT_WIDTH; > - if (clk_div > PWM_CLKDIV_MAX) > + if (clk_div > PWM_CLKDIV_MAX) { > + if (!mdp->enabled) { > + clk_disable_unprepare(mdp->clk_mm); > + clk_disable_unprepare(mdp->clk_main); > + } > return -EINVAL; > - > + } > div = NSEC_PER_SEC * (clk_div + 1); > period = div64_u64(rate * period_ns, div); > if (period > 0) > @@ -98,16 +119,6 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, > high_width = div64_u64(rate * duty_ns, div); > value = period | (high_width << PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT); > > - err = clk_enable(mdp->clk_main); > - if (err < 0) > - return err; > - > - err = clk_enable(mdp->clk_mm); > - if (err < 0) { > - clk_disable(mdp->clk_main); > - return err; > - } > - > mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0, > PWM_CLKDIV_MASK, > clk_div << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT); > @@ -122,10 +133,19 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, > mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->commit, > mdp->data->commit_mask, > 0x0); > + } else { > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->bls_debug, > + mdp->data->bls_debug_mask, > + mdp->data->bls_debug_mask); > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0, > + mdp->data->con0_sel, > + mdp->data->con0_sel); This is unrelated for this patch, isn't it? > } > > - clk_disable(mdp->clk_mm); > - clk_disable(mdp->clk_main); > + if (!mdp->enabled) { > + clk_disable_unprepare(mdp->clk_mm); > + clk_disable_unprepare(mdp->clk_main); > + } > > return 0; > } > @@ -135,18 +155,25 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) > struct mtk_disp_pwm *mdp = to_mtk_disp_pwm(chip); > int err; > > - err = clk_enable(mdp->clk_main); > - if (err < 0) > - return err; > - > - err = clk_enable(mdp->clk_mm); > - if (err < 0) { > - clk_disable(mdp->clk_main); > - return err; > + if (!mdp->enabled) { > + err = clk_prepare_enable(mdp->clk_main); > + if (err < 0) { > + dev_err(chip->dev, "Can't enable mdp->clk_main: %pe\n", > + ERR_PTR(err)); > + return err; > + } > + err = clk_prepare_enable(mdp->clk_mm); > + if (err < 0) { > + dev_err(chip->dev, "Can't enable mdp->clk_mm: %pe\n", > + ERR_PTR(err)); > + clk_disable_unprepare(mdp->clk_main); > + return err; > + } > } > > mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN, mdp->data->enable_mask, > mdp->data->enable_mask); > + mdp->enabled = true; > > return 0; > } > @@ -158,8 +185,11 @@ static void mtk_disp_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) > mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN, mdp->data->enable_mask, > 0x0); > > - clk_disable(mdp->clk_mm); > - clk_disable(mdp->clk_main); > + if (mdp->enabled) { > + clk_disable_unprepare(mdp->clk_mm); > + clk_disable_unprepare(mdp->clk_main); > + } > + mdp->enabled = false; > } > > static const struct pwm_ops mtk_disp_pwm_ops = { > @@ -192,58 +222,26 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (IS_ERR(mdp->clk_mm)) > return PTR_ERR(mdp->clk_mm); > > - ret = clk_prepare(mdp->clk_main); > - if (ret < 0) > - return ret; > - > - ret = clk_prepare(mdp->clk_mm); > - if (ret < 0) > - goto disable_clk_main; > - > mdp->chip.dev = &pdev->dev; > mdp->chip.ops = &mtk_disp_pwm_ops; > mdp->chip.npwm = 1; > > ret = pwmchip_add(&mdp->chip); > if (ret < 0) { > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pwmchip_add() failed: %d\n", ret); > - goto disable_clk_mm; > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pwmchip_add() failed: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret)); > + return ret; > } > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mdp); > > - /* > - * For MT2701, disable double buffer before writing register > - * and select manual mode and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH. > - */ > - if (!mdp->data->has_commit) { > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->bls_debug, > - mdp->data->bls_debug_mask, > - mdp->data->bls_debug_mask); > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0, > - mdp->data->con0_sel, > - mdp->data->con0_sel); > - } > - Similar than above this is unrelated at least to what you described in the commit log. Maybe this part is better split into a separate patch? > return 0; > - > -disable_clk_mm: > - clk_unprepare(mdp->clk_mm); > -disable_clk_main: > - clk_unprepare(mdp->clk_main); > - return ret; > } Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |