From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5964FC11F66 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:05:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EA4461DD6 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:05:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1EA4461DD6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=QIWsR8o9fBk2TOcDgjtxjdmIcv+von3V91bKRZxgAUs=; b=Qeyj39pqP7JiTK NolgR7Lrt7P4wm4QDv2Z0OdT1ldIESR7EkjWxOBsKtzS4+TQKunyqT1HCEhHhtqvkeqz7pjcEXZ6S fFeoNCOgwR/xBAjaUBTSYn6naVeSdTdp4F5mQ6+h4VTXgdLQ8deSAZzR8KqnEK6NOdoh5ouazVx+k dlS/JMRumLxbTYm6kczjIGa7aacs93r32jkmA9IkShRS+2i4WC28icvGfnBo9srAVI8br4CkI7t6F h+aJSEhbdWCGzIhGH+ulDPYczm+7M60CHxCpLx2jNmJiJrbohe6wxlT5X0nd7drfXklnPREF9XbMV rFmQ9KJifqtgcBO0R/wg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ly9eW-00AJSw-5Y; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:03:32 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ly9eT-00AJSN-4y; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:03:30 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5ECD6E; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 02:03:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.78.75]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5932F3F694; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 02:03:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:02:38 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Hector Yuan , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Sudeep Holla , Matthias Brugger , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wsd_upstream@mediatek.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/2] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW Message-ID: <20210629090238.n23zcttkiqvzpbb5@bogus> References: <1622307153-3639-1-git-send-email-hector.yuan@mediatek.com> <1622307153-3639-2-git-send-email-hector.yuan@mediatek.com> <20210614104058.jdwb7godqzhf7rgd@vireshk-i7> <1624781848.1958.16.camel@mtkswgap22> <20210628072641.amqk5d3svwolvhic@vireshk-i7> <20210628090956.uwkrozdqvawsm3xp@bogus> <20210629024719.nmcygaigtx5wn7g5@vireshk-i7> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210629024719.nmcygaigtx5wn7g5@vireshk-i7> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210629_020329_285159_6B1F178A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.36 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 08:17:19AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 28-06-21, 10:09, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > Probably in driver/cpufreq or some related headers if it needs to access > > related_cpus and is more cpufreq related in that way ? > > It just needs to set a mask, so doesn't really depend on cpufreq. I > was wondering if drivers/opp/of.c may be used for this, and I am not > sure. > Sounds good to me. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel