From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9063C4338F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 16:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A9926052B for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 16:10:26 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 6A9926052B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=o5K3dmJ6P1N6zP/VX2s3WlmoEWjDyQ/DRw0jzBsGMsE=; b=s1Y/4rGYX98Ced 9hbOs7kN1S9yBT3H2EP+7X0NJ6qqQ7/nW4w11YtxFmBqtoWIPdp3NQb7sTQzcJzVEJwv+R0ZxXCkN 06K+sfUbXiZU3s5S+idQTGfvGs4ag0CxHhcuLl/CwwswHhzNfvGeJdJq9UW4v2Frw9Zrhxv4aBRWs euGBGinxtXh6iPrd8qxWaUfkXohCW9Oz4vrpsrIcyOgvJ9Hit2ZYHpp3XHdLZVOdGx05DsUB55aGl 2lLTFq8XfAcEZCwf69CMG0fKvtfckGJdS/8b12rG+Y0Rjp4w7MZ56q3CxyW6i7+cBOmmUO0xvxSg/ bZcTGRnYBgjv3qtsjQLg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m98aG-004xrE-CQ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 16:08:33 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m98Zk-004xcH-3M for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 16:08:01 +0000 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 18:07:56 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1627574877; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EhUCnoOeG3QWQt9hn0a/Me+0BXivNVxesT3D22JaUJM=; b=fmlzLXM8IACx8Z+RmJWC73YzqLD0id4FUAEms9BRrYCaTosO+UZxQSjJkhnHXPw3IKwA+H m/17oPYT1KhgqBSmeVDgvxNLLPuwpfaoeZ5lxlZxBAlXY7nmyfpFz7ucInGipGogABS0ZF P/xuRLL0FxUpP0w1ihN4mVn40fHQ884FibABVo74/2c9qIs97WfpO8jl9B/JEIjMBfLM98 DuE9U3kL55Hns7Y/SUVBx0OINqZm816A29dJ1Ehyqoo6Ps3mTh6vF19D8d3Lx1OJWW+1IE VH+bD5JsE/u+21ymIck4pwgT1xirDKL0OBQyETQFUaUTKNQ6NJLmylVgIwpWsA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1627574877; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EhUCnoOeG3QWQt9hn0a/Me+0BXivNVxesT3D22JaUJM=; b=0/AivC7Kjr0HU6WoWzfqi9SrJdy9vbFM8nF/1hmGOVo93xKeD1bCJAGpVlImrHjK92mRED MejMGVIxxwKKU7BA== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Dave Martin Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/sve: Make kernel FPU protection RT friendly Message-ID: <20210729160756.s6kvhvbdy2erqeq7@linutronix.de> References: <20210729105215.2222338-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20210729105215.2222338-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20210729135459.GL1724@arm.com> <20210729141748.q66pfjoma2a2qd2k@linutronix.de> <20210729153422.GN1724@arm.com> <20210729160030.p76p56r56vx4qoql@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210729160030.p76p56r56vx4qoql@linutronix.de> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210729_090800_372186_9542C53E X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.59 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2021-07-29 18:00:31 [+0200], To Dave Martin wrote: > > But I get what you mean. I'm just not sure regarding the naming since > the code behaves the same on x86 and arm64 here. Assuming that everyone follows this pattern what about fpregs_lock() fpregs_unlock() ? Sebastian _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel