From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qperret@google.com,
dbrazdil@google.com, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@codeaurora.org>,
Shanker R Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/16] KVM: arm64: Wire MMIO guard hypercalls
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:11:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210730131103.GD23756@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v94ud8av.wl-maz@kernel.org>
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:47:20AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 19:11:46 +0100,
> Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 05:31:50PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > Plumb in the hypercall interface to allow a guest to discover,
> > > enroll, map and unmap MMIO regions.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/arm-smccc.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
> > > index 30da78f72b3b..a3deeb907fdd 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
> > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> > >
> > > #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> > > +#include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
> > >
> > > #include <kvm/arm_hypercalls.h>
> > > #include <kvm/arm_psci.h>
> > > @@ -129,10 +130,29 @@ int kvm_hvc_call_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > case ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_FEATURES_FUNC_ID:
> > > val[0] = BIT(ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_FEATURES);
> > > val[0] |= BIT(ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_PTP);
> > > + val[0] |= BIT(ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_MMIO_GUARD_INFO);
> > > + val[0] |= BIT(ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_MMIO_GUARD_ENROLL);
> > > + val[0] |= BIT(ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_MMIO_GUARD_MAP);
> > > + val[0] |= BIT(ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_MMIO_GUARD_UNMAP);
> > > break;
> > > case ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_PTP_FUNC_ID:
> > > kvm_ptp_get_time(vcpu, val);
> > > break;
> > > + case ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_MMIO_GUARD_INFO_FUNC_ID:
> > > + val[0] = PAGE_SIZE;
> > > + break;
> >
> > I get the nagging feeling that querying the stage-2 page-size outside of
> > MMIO guard is going to be useful once we start looking at memory sharing,
> > so perhaps rename this to something more generic?
>
> At this stage, why not follow the architecture and simply expose it as
> ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1.TGran{4,64,16}_2? That's exactly what it is for, and
> we already check for this in KVM itself.
Nice, I hadn't thought of that. On reflection, though, I don't agree that
it's "exactly what it is for" -- the ID register talks about the supported
stage-2 page-sizes, whereas we want to advertise the one page size that
we're currently using. In other words, it's important that we only ever
populate one of the fields and I wonder if that could bite us in future
somehow?
Up to you, you've definitely got a better feel for this than me.
> > > + case ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_MMIO_GUARD_ENROLL_FUNC_ID:
> > > + set_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_MMIO_GUARD, &vcpu->kvm->arch.flags);
> > > + val[0] = SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS;
> > > + break;
> > > + case ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_MMIO_GUARD_MAP_FUNC_ID:
> > > + if (kvm_install_ioguard_page(vcpu, vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 1)))
> > > + val[0] = SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS;
> > > + break;
> > > + case ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_MMIO_GUARD_UNMAP_FUNC_ID:
> > > + if (kvm_remove_ioguard_page(vcpu, vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 1)))
> > > + val[0] = SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS;
> > > + break;
> >
> > I think there's a slight discrepancy between MAP and UNMAP here in that
> > calling UNMAP on something that hasn't been mapped will fail, whereas
> > calling MAP on something that's already been mapped will succeed. I think
> > that might mean you can't reason about the final state of the page if two
> > vCPUs race to call these functions in some cases (and both succeed).
>
> I'm not sure that's the expected behaviour for ioremap(), for example
> (you can ioremap two portions of the same page successfully).
Hmm, good point. Does that mean we should be refcounting the stage-2?
Otherwise if we do something like:
foo = ioremap(page, 0x100);
bar = ioremap(page+0x100, 0x100);
iounmap(foo);
then bar will break. Or did I miss something in the series?
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-30 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-15 16:31 [PATCH 00/16] KVM: arm64: MMIO guard PV services Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 01/16] KVM: arm64: Generalise VM features into a set of flags Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:10 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 9:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-28 14:51 ` Steven Price
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 02/16] KVM: arm64: Don't issue CMOs when the physical address is invalid Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 17:18 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 8:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:10 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 9:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 03/16] KVM: arm64: Turn kvm_pgtable_stage2_set_owner into kvm_pgtable_stage2_annotate Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 10:09 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 10:38 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 11:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:36 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 13:13 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 04/16] KVM: arm64: Add MMIO checking infrastructure Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:13 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 13:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 15:49 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-22 18:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-23 10:16 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-27 18:11 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 9:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 12:26 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 13:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 12:58 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 05/16] KVM: arm64: Plumb MMIO checking into the fault handling Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:11 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 10:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 12:38 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 06/16] KVM: arm64: Force a full unmap on vpcu reinit Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:11 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 10:38 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 12:50 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 07/16] KVM: arm64: Wire MMIO guard hypercalls Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:11 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 10:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 13:11 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-08-01 11:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 08/16] KVM: arm64: Add tracepoint for failed MMIO guard check Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 09/16] KVM: arm64: Advertise a capability for MMIO guard Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 10/16] KVM: arm64: Add some documentation for the MMIO guard feature Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21 21:17 ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-23 13:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-23 13:38 ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-23 13:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 11/16] firmware/smccc: Call arch-specific hook on discovering KVM services Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 12/16] mm/ioremap: Add arch-specific callbacks on ioremap/iounmap calls Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 18:12 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-28 11:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-30 14:07 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 13/16] arm64: Implement ioremap/iounmap hooks calling into KVM's MMIO guard Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 14/16] arm64: Enroll into KVM's MMIO guard if required Marc Zyngier
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 15/16] arm64: Add a helper to retrieve the PTE of a fixmap Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:16 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-15 16:31 ` [PATCH 16/16] arm64: Register earlycon fixmap with the MMIO guard Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21 21:42 ` [PATCH 00/16] KVM: arm64: MMIO guard PV services Andrew Jones
2021-07-22 10:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-22 13:25 ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22 15:30 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210730131103.GD23756@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vatsa@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).