From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D2BC433F5 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 09:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 932E760C40 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 09:37:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 932E760C40 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=REuN/fKb649IzSlHkJd57V1TMkh23imLvwwJVv4w0/s=; b=rzhJObEwl6SFEW /PTjemfjQ9UwIXnYmrWWKZHXF2Pe+6dyxuAkDxUEOwjqgi4aVeBQBOa0jLORd6TeaVgSbu+TRfcr/ sjP/5Uzdw3dOtO/N/x6sYCuReUo8+SnlL3+h8jh2jYEhoy29B3r7kK5HD+TycrUSmWbFg73d5mlL3 Am+T++NqvbhBvKklc+R7Y2IfqYHuefBGRtrOTN4anBrTAkv8RnaP33vX02O9y0eUPVcVx2JPjb3Rf mh538cY7r7fTx9bCRluixPCv1OQ28+eJMpa9Xt1L9f1yicjJ7gMlzlyKk8w5nFrbQYZ1sF4Ta8Jj8 +x60utFq/BJkscJ28tHg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mhTjw-00FpJM-Oi; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 09:36:28 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mhTjs-00FpHy-KR for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 09:36:25 +0000 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0DB5F60F70; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 09:36:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1635759384; bh=T88RiQbxwaGniFcc+rnbVb40RHNPCR76NdrF/7VPCME=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FrWCB0phomgItdYzJVkmmdiLPWPL348dT5ZdLdhW7AKlMoQpbsJ5bWeDgyFdfwH9F GOO3//OVGmgPo9Dnj5Hh2IZ4xqYQdPILUNMqEOVWk/wS4arRk1bHgyUKADImZrIOYS oTUNhuUivfnG4Rq6q/lIH9qbvwL/iGyXLgLH715/EmkP2KqBP8pr6WPYBzN10c41nR 0Uu1lH1D1RpZ6cII5Tg5Y4/tdfMlPex9cBhs+dpn+Jv4TQ4pEBTFoHAygK69FTLAAw dZ9V04UsEuRPvoX8BjLPLUeMskhABJylRYRzktUCkHWtFFZQ1d2eKaeg8cFAiShu2K o/sg0wjYkxBgw== Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 09:36:18 +0000 From: Will Deacon To: Xuesong Chen Cc: helgaas@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, mingo@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI MCFG consolidation and APEI resource filtering Message-ID: <20211101093618.GA27400@willie-the-truck> References: <20211027081035.53370-1-xuesong.chen@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211101_023624_714538_F92B0048 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.41 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi, On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 10:18:35AM +0800, Xuesong Chen wrote: > How about the status of this series, it's really bad, bad and still bad... to wait long > time for the final judgement, especially you take extremely serious to rework it round > by round, finaly you receive nothing. Everyone's work should be repected! I've trimmed the rest of your response as it wasn't especially constructive. Please can you try to keep things civil, even when you're frustrated? It's not very pleasant being on the end of a rant. One likely explanation for you not getting a reply on your patches is that I've discovered many of your emails have ended up in my spam, for some reason. I'm using gmail for my inbox so, if Bjorn is doing that as well, then there's a good chance he hasn't seen them either. The other thing to keep in mind is that the 5.16 merge window opened today and you posted the latest version of your patches on Wednesday. That doesn't really leave enough time for the patches to be reviewed (noting that patch 3 is new in this version and the kernel build robot was still complaining on Friday), queued and put into linux-next, so I would suspect that this series is looking more like 5.17 material and therefore not a priority for maintainers at the moment. Your best is probably to post a v5, with the kbuild warnings addressed, when -rc1 is released in a couple of weeks. I'm not sure how to fix the spam issue though :( Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel