[PATCH 3/3] clk: imx25: make __mx25_clocks_init return void

From: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] clk: imx25: make __mx25_clocks_init return void
Date: Thu,  2 Jun 2022 10:03:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220602080344.208702-4-martin@kaiser.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220602080344.208702-1-martin@kaiser.cx>

The __mx25_clocks_init function always returns 0 and its only
caller does not check the return value. Let's remove it.

Signed-off-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
---
 drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx25.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx25.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx25.c
index 263409fca1eb..72b30dd7f05f 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx25.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx25.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ enum mx25_clks {
 
 static struct clk *clk[clk_max];
 
-static int __init __mx25_clocks_init(void __iomem *ccm_base)
+static void __init __mx25_clocks_init(void __iomem *ccm_base)
 {
 	BUG_ON(!ccm_base);
 
@@ -222,8 +222,6 @@ static int __init __mx25_clocks_init(void __iomem *ccm_base)
 	imx_register_uart_clocks(6);
 
 	imx_print_silicon_rev("i.MX25", mx25_revision());
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
 static void __init mx25_clocks_init_dt(struct device_node *np)
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
