From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: ardb@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
joey.gouly@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org,
will@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] arm64: alternatives: hoist print out of __apply_alternatives()
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 16:13:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220901151403.1735836-5-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220901151403.1735836-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Printing in the middle of __apply_alternatives() is potentially unsafe
and not all that helpful given these days we practically always patch
*something*.
Hoist the print out of __apply_alternatives(), and add separate prints
to __apply_alternatives() and apply_alternatives_all(), which will make
it easier to spot if either patching call goes wrong.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
index 9bcaa5eacf16c..d94d97cb4a0bf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -156,8 +156,6 @@ static void __nocfi __apply_alternatives(struct alt_region *region, bool is_modu
else
BUG_ON(alt->alt_len != alt->orig_len);
- pr_info_once("patching kernel code\n");
-
origptr = ALT_ORIG_PTR(alt);
updptr = is_module ? origptr : lm_alias(origptr);
nr_inst = alt->orig_len / AARCH64_INSN_SIZE;
@@ -225,6 +223,8 @@ static int __apply_alternatives_multi_stop(void *unused)
void __init apply_alternatives_all(void)
{
+ pr_info("applying system-wide alternatives\n");
+
/* better not try code patching on a live SMP system */
stop_machine(__apply_alternatives_multi_stop, NULL, cpu_online_mask);
}
@@ -244,6 +244,8 @@ void __init apply_boot_alternatives(void)
/* If called on non-boot cpu things could go wrong */
WARN_ON(smp_processor_id() != 0);
+ pr_info("applying boot alternatives\n");
+
__apply_alternatives(®ion, false, &boot_capabilities[0]);
}
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-01 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-01 15:13 [PATCH 0/9] arm64: alternatives: improvements Mark Rutland
2022-09-01 15:13 ` [PATCH 1/9] arm64: cpufeature: make cpus_have_cap() noinstr-safe Mark Rutland
2022-09-01 15:13 ` [PATCH 2/9] arm64: alternatives: kvm: prepare for cap changes Mark Rutland
2022-09-01 15:13 ` [PATCH 3/9] arm64: alternatives: proton-pack: " Mark Rutland
2022-09-02 16:19 ` Joey Gouly
2022-09-05 8:46 ` Mark Rutland
2022-09-01 15:13 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2022-09-01 15:13 ` [PATCH 5/9] arm64: alternatives: make alt_region const Mark Rutland
2022-09-06 15:18 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-09-12 9:31 ` Mark Rutland
2022-09-12 10:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-09-12 12:13 ` Mark Rutland
2022-09-01 15:14 ` [PATCH 6/9] arm64: alternatives: have callbacks take a cap Mark Rutland
2022-09-02 15:54 ` Joey Gouly
2022-09-05 8:48 ` Mark Rutland
2022-09-01 15:14 ` [PATCH 7/9] arm64: alternatives: add alternative_has_feature_*() Mark Rutland
2022-09-01 15:14 ` [PATCH 8/9] arm64: alternatives: add shared NOP callback Mark Rutland
2022-09-01 15:14 ` [PATCH 9/9] HACK: arm64: alternatives: dump summary of alternatives Mark Rutland
2022-09-12 12:36 ` Mark Brown
2022-09-12 16:14 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220901151403.1735836-5-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).