* [PATCH -next] arm64: alternatives: Use vdso/bits.h instead of linux/bits.h
@ 2022-10-03 19:37 Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-04 12:30 ` Will Deacon
2022-10-05 10:52 ` Catalin Marinas
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Chancellor @ 2022-10-03 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Mark Rutland
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, llvm, patches, Nathan Chancellor
When building with CONFIG_LTO after commit ba00c2a04fa5 ("arm64: fix the
build with binutils 2.27"), the following build error occurs:
In file included from arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c:6:
In file included from include/linux/elf.h:6:
In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h:8:
In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h:9:
In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h:9:
In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h:5:
In file included from include/linux/bits.h:22:
In file included from include/linux/build_bug.h:5:
In file included from include/linux/compiler.h:248:
In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h:71:
include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:67:9: error: expected string literal in 'asm'
return __READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)addr);
^
arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h:43:16: note: expanded from macro '__READ_ONCE'
asm volatile(__LOAD_RCPC(b, %w0, %1) \
^
arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h:17:2: note: expanded from macro '__LOAD_RCPC'
ALTERNATIVE( \
^
Similar to the issue resolved by commit 0072dc1b53c3 ("arm64: avoid
BUILD_BUG_ON() in alternative-macros"), there is a circular include
dependency through <linux/bits.h> when CONFIG_LTO is enabled due to
<asm/rwonce.h> appearing in the include chain before the contents of
<asm/alternative-macros.h>, which results in ALTERNATIVE() not getting
expanded properly because it has not been defined yet.
Avoid this issue by including <vdso/bits.h>, which includes the
definition of the BIT() macro, instead of <linux/bits.h>, as BIT() is the
only macro from bits.h that is relevant to this header.
Fixes: ba00c2a04fa5 ("arm64: fix the build with binutils 2.27")
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1728
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h
index b5ac0b85c9bb..3622e9f4fb44 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
#ifndef __ASM_ALTERNATIVE_MACROS_H
#define __ASM_ALTERNATIVE_MACROS_H
-#include <linux/bits.h>
#include <linux/const.h>
+#include <vdso/bits.h>
#include <asm/cpucaps.h>
#include <asm/insn-def.h>
base-commit: ba00c2a04fa5431d204a4183062b30372c062aa7
--
2.37.3
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] arm64: alternatives: Use vdso/bits.h instead of linux/bits.h
2022-10-03 19:37 [PATCH -next] arm64: alternatives: Use vdso/bits.h instead of linux/bits.h Nathan Chancellor
@ 2022-10-04 12:30 ` Will Deacon
2022-10-05 10:52 ` Catalin Marinas
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2022-10-04 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan Chancellor
Cc: Catalin Marinas, Mark Rutland, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel,
llvm, patches
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 12:37:59PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> When building with CONFIG_LTO after commit ba00c2a04fa5 ("arm64: fix the
> build with binutils 2.27"), the following build error occurs:
>
> In file included from arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c:6:
> In file included from include/linux/elf.h:6:
> In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h:8:
> In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h:9:
> In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h:9:
> In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h:5:
> In file included from include/linux/bits.h:22:
> In file included from include/linux/build_bug.h:5:
> In file included from include/linux/compiler.h:248:
> In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h:71:
> include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:67:9: error: expected string literal in 'asm'
> return __READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)addr);
> ^
> arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h:43:16: note: expanded from macro '__READ_ONCE'
> asm volatile(__LOAD_RCPC(b, %w0, %1) \
> ^
> arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h:17:2: note: expanded from macro '__LOAD_RCPC'
> ALTERNATIVE( \
> ^
>
> Similar to the issue resolved by commit 0072dc1b53c3 ("arm64: avoid
> BUILD_BUG_ON() in alternative-macros"), there is a circular include
> dependency through <linux/bits.h> when CONFIG_LTO is enabled due to
> <asm/rwonce.h> appearing in the include chain before the contents of
> <asm/alternative-macros.h>, which results in ALTERNATIVE() not getting
> expanded properly because it has not been defined yet.
>
> Avoid this issue by including <vdso/bits.h>, which includes the
> definition of the BIT() macro, instead of <linux/bits.h>, as BIT() is the
> only macro from bits.h that is relevant to this header.
>
> Fixes: ba00c2a04fa5 ("arm64: fix the build with binutils 2.27")
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1728
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h
> index b5ac0b85c9bb..3622e9f4fb44 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h
> @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
> #ifndef __ASM_ALTERNATIVE_MACROS_H
> #define __ASM_ALTERNATIVE_MACROS_H
>
> -#include <linux/bits.h>
> #include <linux/const.h>
> +#include <vdso/bits.h>
>
> #include <asm/cpucaps.h>
> #include <asm/insn-def.h>
>
> base-commit: ba00c2a04fa5431d204a4183062b30372c062aa7
The 'vdso' namespace is a bit of a misnomer, but that's not your fault and I
can confirm that this fixes the build on for-next/core with defconfig + thin
LTO, so:
Tested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Thanks!
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] arm64: alternatives: Use vdso/bits.h instead of linux/bits.h
2022-10-03 19:37 [PATCH -next] arm64: alternatives: Use vdso/bits.h instead of linux/bits.h Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-04 12:30 ` Will Deacon
@ 2022-10-05 10:52 ` Catalin Marinas
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2022-10-05 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan Chancellor, Mark Rutland, Will Deacon
Cc: patches, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, llvm
On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 12:37:59 -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> When building with CONFIG_LTO after commit ba00c2a04fa5 ("arm64: fix the
> build with binutils 2.27"), the following build error occurs:
>
> In file included from arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c:6:
> In file included from include/linux/elf.h:6:
> In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h:8:
> In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h:9:
> In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h:9:
> In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h:5:
> In file included from include/linux/bits.h:22:
> In file included from include/linux/build_bug.h:5:
> In file included from include/linux/compiler.h:248:
> In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h:71:
> include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:67:9: error: expected string literal in 'asm'
> return __READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)addr);
> ^
> arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h:43:16: note: expanded from macro '__READ_ONCE'
> asm volatile(__LOAD_RCPC(b, %w0, %1) \
> ^
> arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h:17:2: note: expanded from macro '__LOAD_RCPC'
> ALTERNATIVE( \
> ^
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/core), thanks!
[1/1] arm64: alternatives: Use vdso/bits.h instead of linux/bits.h
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/d2995249a2f7
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-10-05 10:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-10-03 19:37 [PATCH -next] arm64: alternatives: Use vdso/bits.h instead of linux/bits.h Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-04 12:30 ` Will Deacon
2022-10-05 10:52 ` Catalin Marinas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).