From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0172BC433F5 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 22:10:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=NceeQUxHXoS+K6ZRrOCQL5IV4xRMotQYPlCqbSKUiWo=; b=0HMQkjbA9SUG66D2tXIJ06zYUF uszjTQozL3PSMgijhikfHk1/3U0AC2XlakaEiU9W3XZwvuk8th14oKO+trJna2ZoXchTCtNg42LI5 jo9KzYgW4GU49Ke2DmmoBcQIdW7FfgjnIDOQP+MBi7Mc5uq21mkF30pUWuC88k7zN3qLuCDIfOYt2 ixADbUrga1SCi6CKiXIXVSMRvHw+z6Ks6DFHZc5WxgkqiSVLYId/WLHomPGl0pYxbBv9+huxACiYt rRLnj21iQm4rgEHxydFmxb027u/aC1uCBzsveLeQIcufzcrEzH9/Ota57w4xDzBjMuFGZeFux8Nzd /smCIbcw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ofq6P-00BKKT-4s; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 22:09:25 +0000 Received: from alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.38]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ofq6M-00BKJh-08; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 22:09:23 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; i=@quicinc.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1664921362; x=1696457362; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Tl1E9BfZvZYbpsQIOv96jlcFLSCW7GEBBalRGY9gfl4=; b=tGo+MeGmndW/G6BHLd4M3DlFhy0Pr35qgTZMMTnQmFCuI1O0WbUyuDRS LOLvhYSwGPNLqopm+wfo+/FIcPnbnP+y/fITTPI6j571yFJJmJppQtPHo Y7kvIwPOXsYR0vkfadMaO8lAZjWeqpTnyo66tVFQr8/AUsc1nTXUTyv+0 k=; Received: from unknown (HELO ironmsg04-sd.qualcomm.com) ([10.53.140.144]) by alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 04 Oct 2022 15:09:16 -0700 X-QCInternal: smtphost Received: from unknown (HELO nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com) ([10.52.223.231]) by ironmsg04-sd.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Oct 2022 15:09:14 -0700 Received: from asutoshd-linux1.qualcomm.com (10.80.80.8) by nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.29; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 15:09:14 -0700 Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 15:09:14 -0700 From: Asutosh Das To: Bart Van Assche CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , Alim Akhtar , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Matthias Brugger , Jinyoung Choi , Kiwoong Kim , open list , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/16] ufs: core: Probe for ext_iid support Message-ID: <20221004220913.GC25671@asutoshd-linux1.qualcomm.com> References: <2f5a8742-b25d-d6b3-c6a4-1c119a94d569@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2f5a8742-b25d-d6b3-c6a4-1c119a94d569@acm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8] X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) To nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221004_150922_099124_9D674401 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.54 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Sep 30 2022 at 11:23 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: >On 9/22/22 18:05, Asutosh Das wrote: >>+ hba->mcq_capabilities = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_MCQCAP); > >What value is reported when reading the REG_MCQCAP register on an >UFSHCI 3.0 controller? -1 or 0? > It reads 0. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel