From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2ACEC6FD19 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 08:42:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc :To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=Z9FUkBNx0B5XQjzgzMD+Gk5pnpL6Z+BXX8130jt76sM=; b=BF1FcMvRChgQAW aqjK4Cz4Hj41YqtlBnhS6549Cx4OJhQX0PxLFGB4vgeNYhkjrrK39g3afgbMUbqU9Zr0tsm2W3NLk NGeGU3a3NNOWNs3W6JvA/f2U9q2GNZMuWlyw1Nrp9Wn86H3YR9oeOnEE0iaQ5yhPHvg9aAc/CvT3H pspO8DTEtOis9Qs/bjMUw9CGdJ/Lobaga/Ui5zj9YHZq+B+WgTof+Li3S78VHfNlxi07bHIrfhYg3 zwr5rg2ZDN5avRUi4OVkTzlcWc+y98pSn+ldjbCVa56YHZEBjVCxhGNKB60cJgiYts/JsrJfDaFFH nE5fnDe5GOej7gv8mzSw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pZ6Pi-00Bwf9-6m; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 08:41:46 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pZ6Pc-00BwcV-2j for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 08:41:42 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1678092097; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ia/TpNw+FdzgwNfhvXboS3FJRvVhJBlZ4xIsegJQs4Q=; b=K6rnxCxAZGmzOwG3Vg6yrBpK1MnTsgZBB6Da/p93CKcFebz0M8eUDP12/2LmhL/X9DOT1h KNKUjeOngRD2WWYgkMYihqsrOv/M66hbsrycLR3S7Ecr3OeJM6rwhwSL6IqtTf+wSm2RSA 5z2fHZ+esWr7YMaDSNTsWfx2+f2wlzQ= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-606-RlTEIn2QMOWwRFP8UZOh-w-1; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 03:41:34 -0500 X-MC-Unique: RlTEIn2QMOWwRFP8UZOh-w-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04742185A7A4; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 08:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from MiWiFi-R3L-srv.redhat.com (ovpn-12-63.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.63]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7D440C1106; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 08:41:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Baoquan He To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, horms@kernel.org, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, John.p.donnelly@oracle.com, will@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Baoquan He Subject: [PATCH v4] arm64: kdump: simplify the reservation behaviour of crashkernel=,high Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 16:41:24 +0800 Message-Id: <20230306084124.300584-1-bhe@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.2 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230306_004140_206560_A9105279 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.90 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On arm64, reservation for 'crashkernel=xM,high' is taken by searching for suitable memory region top down. If the 'xM' of crashkernel high memory is reserved from high memory successfully, it will try to reserve crashkernel low memory later accoringly. Otherwise, it will try to search low memory area for the 'xM' suitable region. Please see the details in Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt. While we observed an unexpected case where a reserved region crosses the high and low meomry boundary. E.g on a system with 4G as low memory end, user added the kernel parameters like: 'crashkernel=512M,high', it could finally have [4G-126M, 4G+386M], [1G, 1G+128M] regions in running kernel. The crashkernel high region crossing low and high memory boudary will bring issues: 1) For crashkernel=x,high, if getting crashkernel high region across low and high memory boundary, then user will see two memory regions in low memory, and one memory region in high memory. The two crashkernel low memory regions are confusing as shown in above example. 2) If people explicityly specify "crashkernel=x,high crashkernel=y,low" and y <= 128M, when crashkernel high region crosses low and high memory boundary and the part of crashkernel high reservation below boundary is bigger than y, the expected crahskernel low reservation will be skipped. But the expected crashkernel high reservation is shrank and could not satisfy user space requirement. 3) The crossing boundary behaviour of crahskernel high reservation is different than x86 arch. On x86_64, the low memory end is 4G fixedly, and the memory near 4G is reserved by system, e.g for mapping firmware, pci mapping, so the crashkernel reservation crossing boundary never happens. >From distros point of view, this brings inconsistency and confusion. Users need to dig into x86 and arm64 system details to find out why. For kernel itself, the impact of issue 3) could be slight. While issue 1) and 2) cause actual impact because it brings obscure semantics and behaviour to crashkernel=,high reservation. Here, for crashkernel=xM,high, search the high memory for the suitable region only in high memory. If failed, try reserving the suitable region only in low memory. Like this, the crashkernel high region will only exist in high memory, and crashkernel low region only exists in low memory. The reservation behaviour for crashkernel=,high is clearer and simpler. Note: On arm64, the high and low memory boudary could be 1G if it's RPi4 system, or 4G if other normal systems. Signed-off-by: Baoquan He --- Change history: v3->v4: - Change pr_info() to pr_warn() when fixed allocation failed. Leizhen pointed out this and suggested changing. v2->v3: - Rephrase patch log to clarify the current crashkernel high reservation could cross the high and low memory boundary, but not 4G boundary only, because RPi4 of arm64 has high and low memory boudary as 1G. The v3 patch log could mislead people that the RPi4 also use 4G as high,low memory boundary. v1->v2: - Fold patch 2 of v1 into patch 1 for better reviewing. - Update patch log to add more details. arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c index 58a0bb2c17f1..307763f97549 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c @@ -127,12 +127,13 @@ static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(unsigned long long low_size) */ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) { - unsigned long long crash_base, crash_size; - unsigned long long crash_low_size = 0; + unsigned long long crash_base, crash_size, search_base; unsigned long long crash_max = CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX; + unsigned long long crash_low_size = 0; char *cmdline = boot_command_line; - int ret; bool fixed_base = false; + bool high = false; + int ret; if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE)) return; @@ -155,7 +156,9 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) else if (ret) return; + search_base = CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX; crash_max = CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX; + high = true; } else if (ret || !crash_size) { /* The specified value is invalid */ return; @@ -166,31 +169,51 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) /* User specifies base address explicitly. */ if (crash_base) { fixed_base = true; + search_base = crash_base; crash_max = crash_base + crash_size; } retry: crash_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(crash_size, CRASH_ALIGN, - crash_base, crash_max); + search_base, crash_max); if (!crash_base) { /* - * If the first attempt was for low memory, fall back to - * high memory, the minimum required low memory will be - * reserved later. + * For crashkernel=size[KMG]@offset[KMG], print out failure + * message if can't reserve the specified region. */ - if (!fixed_base && (crash_max == CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX)) { + if (fixed_base) { + pr_warn("crashkernel reservation failed - memory is in use.\n"); + return; + } + + /* + * For crashkernel=size[KMG], if the first attempt was for + * low memory, fall back to high memory, the minimum required + * low memory will be reserved later. + */ + if (!high && crash_max == CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX) { crash_max = CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX; + search_base = CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX; crash_low_size = DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE; goto retry; } + /* + * For crashkernel=size[KMG],high, if the first attempt was + * for high memory, fall back to low memory. + */ + if (high && crash_max == CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX) { + crash_max = CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX; + search_base = 0; + goto retry; + } pr_warn("cannot allocate crashkernel (size:0x%llx)\n", crash_size); return; } - if ((crash_base > CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX - crash_low_size) && - crash_low_size && reserve_crashkernel_low(crash_low_size)) { + if ((crash_base >= CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX) && crash_low_size && + reserve_crashkernel_low(crash_low_size)) { memblock_phys_free(crash_base, crash_size); return; } -- 2.34.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel