[PATCH 03/15] i2c: exynos5: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()

[Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>]

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
index 385ef9d9e4d4..d8baca9b610c 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
@@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ static bool exynos5_i2c_poll_irqs_timeout(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c,
 static int exynos5_i2c_xfer_msg(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c,
 			      struct i2c_msg *msgs, int stop)
 {
-	unsigned long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 	int ret;
 
 	i2c->msg = msgs;
@@ -775,13 +775,13 @@ static int exynos5_i2c_xfer_msg(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c,
 	exynos5_i2c_message_start(i2c, stop);
 
 	if (!i2c->atomic)
-		timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->msg_complete,
-						      EXYNOS5_I2C_TIMEOUT);
-	else
-		timeout = exynos5_i2c_poll_irqs_timeout(i2c,
+		time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->msg_complete,
 							EXYNOS5_I2C_TIMEOUT);
+	else
+		time_left = exynos5_i2c_poll_irqs_timeout(i2c,
+							  EXYNOS5_I2C_TIMEOUT);
 
-	if (timeout == 0)
+	if (time_left == 0)
 		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
 	else
 		ret = i2c->state;
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel