From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart) Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 02:28:55 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] media: atmel-isi: remove mck back compatiable code as we don't need it In-Reply-To: References: <1425531661-20040-1-git-send-email-josh.wu@atmel.com> <54F97DDF.7010403@atmel.com> Message-ID: <2234113.JDoJN7Dx5y@avalon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 06 March 2015 21:25:36 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015, Josh Wu wrote: > > On 3/5/2015 6:41 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> On Thursday 05 March 2015 13:01:01 Josh Wu wrote: > >>> The master clock should handled by sensor itself. > >> > >> I like that :-) > >> > >>> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu > >>> --- > >>> > >>> drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/atmel-isi.c | 32 ------------------- > >>> 1 file changed, 32 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/atmel-isi.c > >>> b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/atmel-isi.c index 4a384f1..50375ce > >>> 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/atmel-isi.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/atmel-isi.c > >>> @@ -83,8 +83,6 @@ struct atmel_isi { > >>> > >>> struct completion complete; > >>> /* ISI peripherial clock */ > >>> struct clk *pclk; > >>> > >>> - /* ISI_MCK, feed to camera sensor to generate pixel clock */ > >>> - struct clk *mck; > >>> > >>> unsigned int irq; > >>> > >>> struct isi_platform_data pdata; > >>> > >>> @@ -725,26 +723,12 @@ static void isi_camera_remove_device(struct > >>> soc_camera_device *icd) /* Called with .host_lock held */ > >>> > >>> static int isi_camera_clock_start(struct soc_camera_host *ici) > >>> { > >>> > >>> - struct atmel_isi *isi = ici->priv; > >>> - int ret; > >>> - > >>> - if (!IS_ERR(isi->mck)) { > >>> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(isi->mck); > >>> - if (ret) { > >>> - return ret; > >>> - } > >>> - } > >>> - > >>> > >>> return 0; > >> > >> Would it make sense to make the clock_start and clock_stop operations > >> optional in the soc-camera core ? > > > > I agree. For those camera host which don't provide master clock for > > sensor, clock_start and clock_stop should be optional. > > > > Hi, Guennadi > > > > Do you agree with this? > > Yes, sure, we can do this. Would anyone like to prepare a patch? Josh, would you like to do that, or should I give it a go ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart