From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
ARM-SoC Maintainers <arm@kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM/arm64: arm_pm_restart removal
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:55:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2264d37c-c584-7272-8343-2f592eaeb565@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bf4d9e5b2fa67533c190567498a5b0b@agner.ch>
On 10/14/19 5:18 AM, Stefan Agner wrote:
> On 2019-10-03 15:15, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 10/2/19 11:46 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>> It looks like it's an old patchset that you were cc:d on at the time,
>>> but I can't blame anyone for missing context here.
>>>
>>> Thierry, a reference to the thread would have been useful:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/
>>>
>>> Given that the code is 2.5 years old, posting it again for awareness
>>> seems appropriate, even if it was acked by a few stakeholders
>>> originally.
>>>
>>
>> Thierry,
>>
>> would you mind doing that ?
>>
>> To give some background: I had completely forgotten about this, until I recently
>> hit a problem with restart that was difficult to debug since it was
>> hard to figure
>> out which reset sequence was actually executed. I thought about re-posting the
>> series, but then we (ie those who cared enough to be involved in above
>> referenced
>> exchange) decided to use this approach. Now I still wonder what it will take
>> to get the series applied.
>>
>> At least posting the series as pull request did generate some attention.
>> I count that as an improvement.
>
> By chance I just sent a patch which moves to restart handler for PSCI
> this weekend [1]. So this patch set is very much appreciated.
>
I would suggest to not rely on this series. This is the third time this
has been tried. Each time the series was either ignored, or there were
unspecified objections along the line of "we need review this further".
I may be pessimistic, but at this point I don't think the series will
ever be applied. With that in mind, it might be better to either apply
your patch for PSCI, or the matching patch from this series.
Guenter
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-15 0:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-02 13:12 [GIT PULL] ARM/arm64: arm_pm_restart removal Thierry Reding
2019-10-02 16:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-10-02 18:46 ` Olof Johansson
2019-10-03 13:15 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-10-14 12:18 ` Stefan Agner
2019-10-15 0:55 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2264d37c-c584-7272-8343-2f592eaeb565@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).