From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B99C432C0 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:43:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F3AC20708 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:43:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="ppMD/BnH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1F3AC20708 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=misterjones.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date: MIME-Version:Subject:To:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=swXFc/eHodwxSOXFOM1x+GiqriGasuw73p+IHN7y7go=; b=ppMD/BnH1vpeXYvNh73volMgt B7iHSB13LZufyycYkxynS+q7ZQAgk2jvBPXxpvgYnB4S/HhyRZSnG1M4w8o7LZpi5Ks4+Qg/HLvtg CQKp+eLj05yTAJOyUcDPShf7syKdkVVtWrSkbHzPuO0zt0Ub5UI7FWMJSOWCJocpVih7ke1bsGQLc rGCUVXaF6GOWXnK+HuZ2AmUWrrpY21VywvExP7gugYG37CYoi8+nz0AglCgp/c09g2UFczE9ejdDp 9Tm182qHw3v44zULlWZdUPwhGxr9mYKXEoXIZV3Fyg3fUqPo2h+XJsJDLBfgkDLgcBzRgA3UF0JSU DDty2s4iQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iY5TQ-0007GN-4j; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:43:32 +0000 Received: from inca-roads.misterjones.org ([213.251.177.50]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iY5TJ-0007FN-9f; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:43:30 +0000 Received: from www-data by cheepnis.misterjones.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1iY5T7-0006Qm-I2; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:43:13 +0100 To: James Tai Subject: RE: [PATCH] arm64: dts: realtek: Add Realtek rtd1619 and mjolnir X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:main.inc MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:43:13 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier Organization: Metropolis In-Reply-To: <7c94c59649c04442886a98c057c07654@realtek.com> References: <43B123F21A8CFE44A9641C099E4196FFCF91BEFA@RTITMBSVM04.realtek.com.tw> <25fdd8eb-f1a0-82ae-9c4b-22325b163b0e@suse.de> <43B123F21A8CFE44A9641C099E4196FFCF920024@RTITMBSVM04.realtek.com.tw> <7a05ac2c-00bc-b2ac-0a33-be0242d33188@suse.de> <309cd67da48e4702ae3dcc4ca8ab4309@realtek.com> <279fd3a3-17dc-5796-f0b0-e39eb919081f@suse.de> <7c94c59649c04442886a98c057c07654@realtek.com> Message-ID: <23f44f6f4aec90b412d5d7ff6f4d95f1@www.loen.fr> X-Sender: maz@misterjones.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.7.2 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: james.tai@realtek.com, afaerber@suse.de, mark.rutland@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@misterjones.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cheepnis.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191122_014325_480567_DA256686 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.25 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org, "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , Rob Herring , =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2019-11-17 15:39, James Tai wrote: > Hi Andreas, > >> > Sorry for my misunderstanding. The RAM region don't require two >> cells >> > for memory nodes, so I'll fix it in v3 patch. >> >> Should I then also change RTD1395 to use only one cell, or does it >> support >> more RAM than RTD1619? > > Yes, you can. The memory capacity of RTD1395 and RTD1619 are the > same. > >> By my calculation 0x98000000 is less than 2.4 GiB! So, does RAM >> continue >> between r-bus and GIC, similar to how it does on RTD1195? Then we >> need to >> exclude those RAM ranges from the SoC node (adjusting 0x68000000). > > We need to reserve memory address for r-bus and GIC and exclude those > RAM range from the SoC node. Memory for the GIC? For what purpose? M. -- Who you jivin' with that Cosmik Debris? _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel