linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] mm: Cleanup faultaround and finish_fault() codepaths
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 06:57:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ed7aff4-3c07-364f-838b-7342625b12a1@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210210114448.GA28682@willie-the-truck>

On 2/10/21 3:44 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 12:24:49PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 05:59:27PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> alloc_set_pte() has two users with different requirements: in the
>>> faultaround code, it called from an atomic context and PTE page table
>>> has to be preallocated. finish_fault() can sleep and allocate page table
>>> as needed.
>>>
>>> PTL locking rules are also strange, hard to follow and overkill for
>>> finish_fault().
>>>
>>> Let's untangle the mess. alloc_set_pte() has gone now. All locking is
>>> explicit.
>>>
>>> The price is some code duplication to handle huge pages in faultaround
>>> path, but it should be fine, having overall improvement in readability.
>>>
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201229132819.najtavneutnf7ajp@box
>>> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
>>> [will: s/from from/from/ in comment; spotted by willy]
>>> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>>  fs/xfs/xfs_file.c       |   6 +-
>>>  include/linux/mm.h      |  12 ++-
>>>  include/linux/pgtable.h |  11 +++
>>>  mm/filemap.c            | 177 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>>  mm/memory.c             | 199 ++++++++++++----------------------------
>>>  5 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 192 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> When building microblaze:mmu_defconfig:
>>
>> mm/filemap.c: In function 'filemap_map_pages':
>> mm/filemap.c:3153:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'update_mmu_cache'; did you mean 'update_mmu_tlb'?
>>
>> Bisect log attached.
> 
> Looks like a missing include.
> 
Indeed.

> Will
> 
> --->8
> 
>>From 076f93117c067d5b6caab4773c6d6da130859cc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:15:11 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: filemap: Fix microblaze build failure with
>  'mmu_defconfig'
> 
> Commit f9ce0be71d1f ("mm: Cleanup faultaround and finish_fault()
> codepaths") added a call to 'update_mmu_cache()' in mm/filemap.c, which
> breaks the build for microblaze:
> 
>   | mm/filemap.c: In function 'filemap_map_pages':
>   | mm/filemap.c:3153:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'update_mmu_cache'; did you mean 'update_mmu_tlb'?
> 
> Include asm/tlbflush.h in mm/filemap.c to make sure that the function
> (or indeed, macro) is available.
> 
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210209202449.GA104837@roeck-us.net
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

> ---
>  mm/filemap.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index fb7a8d9b5603..2ca13227747b 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>  #include <linux/ramfs.h>
>  #include <linux/page_idle.h>
>  #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
> +#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>  #include "internal.h"
>  
>  #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-10 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-14 17:59 [PATCH v3 0/8] Create 'old' ptes for faultaround mappings on arm64 with hardware access flag Will Deacon
2021-01-14 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] mm: Cleanup faultaround and finish_fault() codepaths Will Deacon
2021-02-09 20:24   ` Guenter Roeck
2021-02-10 11:44     ` Will Deacon
2021-02-10 14:57       ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2021-01-14 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] mm: Allow architectures to request 'old' entries when prefaulting Will Deacon
2021-01-14 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] arm64: mm: Implement arch_wants_old_prefaulted_pte() Will Deacon
2021-01-14 17:59 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] mm: Pass 'address' to map to do_set_pte() and drop FAULT_FLAG_PREFAULT Will Deacon
2021-01-14 18:17   ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-15 10:24     ` Will Deacon
2021-01-14 17:59 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] mm: Avoid modifying vmf.info.address in __collapse_huge_page_swapin() Will Deacon
2021-01-14 17:59 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] mm: Use static initialisers for 'info' field of 'struct vm_fault' Will Deacon
2021-01-14 17:59 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] mm: Mark 'info' field of 'struct vm_fault' as 'const' Will Deacon
     [not found] ` <20210114175934.13070-5-will@kernel.org>
2021-01-14 18:16   ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] mm: Separate fault info out of 'struct vm_fault' Linus Torvalds
2021-01-14 19:00     ` Will Deacon
2021-01-14 19:09       ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-14 19:41         ` Will Deacon
2021-01-14 20:09           ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-01-14 21:11           ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-15  9:23             ` Will Deacon
2021-01-15 21:32               ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-20  0:00                 ` Nick Desaulniers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2ed7aff4-3c07-364f-838b-7342625b12a1@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vinmenon@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).