From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA560C282CE for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 06:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75A4624B6F for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 06:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="OuVsMjBx"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="A/pg8LgY" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 75A4624B6F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description :Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=q0MdYDpcTP6fTFq4ag7i4xkl3nHNVQ+Th91cOf8kN1k=; b=OuVsMjBxUUhJmV sxfL2V62pVXsoxw8K3r2DD50E2txOW3mErR23fUg0R2gTPquz/p9zz64dtjeNArvF3L+mJuQL90OC uq6Jn7B0bs4xu2vyRu4Ffs5EveuR29DlR4gdOM1e3DS3W23NB3SCvDirLQTrYT3W/Nv1VwJM0uLBJ KDHwYURw0zQmlXF+s55xqSYquGa3rrjDYF/BRgh3B5o8rzunKfyCJDA8/JPRQNlDbacXLY+A97TlP 0fnESYrTK63b2dA4/WIm/sxMRFT0LLSv1wDTTObvA+UhZxguGpvRWNBdoixMqbPMZjm6FgFsFHYEi ttaZNnLT2+cBomRX6Prg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hY2mn-0004HB-Kh; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 06:19:05 +0000 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hY2mk-0004Gq-RQ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 06:19:04 +0000 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x546Ix78116595; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 01:18:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1559629139; bh=jvqL2oo7kskDDbMtCsx2Fz2AQjGWe3N34LruTZ8+CvE=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=A/pg8LgY5XbvJdRfUVgHoYuMS/6Yer5ipsxWstl/0yjWrMGEyz1fM2Y9vY0sR6osh mpBUZGoxYi7F59A8aJ+lUZBmMYvmRh671YtwJhPofdPK4teJST3T+DHbKjK3UIF9FV cT3ZJti06b0FZ70l4qg5rrbJDcJ9ZS2K2/4Zn4Cg= Received: from DFLE101.ent.ti.com (dfle101.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.22]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x546IxUV045962 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 01:18:59 -0500 Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) by DFLE101.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 01:18:58 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 01:18:58 -0500 Received: from [172.24.190.172] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x546ItYQ079544; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 01:18:56 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add Support for MMC in J721E To: Faiz Abbas , , , References: <20190604060914.10886-1-faiz_abbas@ti.com> From: Sekhar Nori Message-ID: <2f45cef2-c4ca-0404-b205-fabbb92a40fb@ti.com> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 11:48:55 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190604060914.10886-1-faiz_abbas@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190603_231902_970066_9A5F6B8F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.39 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: nm@ti.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 04/06/19 11:39 AM, Faiz Abbas wrote: > The following patches add driver support for MMC SDHCI interfaces on > TI's J721E devices. The 8 bit and 4 bit instances have phys which are > different from the am65x interfaces as well as different from each > other which leads to 3 different compatibles and a bunch of flags for > indicating the differences. > > Depends on Nishanth's initial J721E patches here: > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1077382/ This dependency is only for testing, not for applying these, right? Thanks, Sekhar _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel