From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: rjw@rjwysocki.net (Rafael J. Wysocki)
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 23:15:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove ARCH_HAS_OPP
In-Reply-To: <20140606130850.GO2520@sirena.org.uk>
References: <1402051016-28853-1-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org>
 <20140606125003.GA13332@verge.net.au> <20140606130850.GO2520@sirena.org.uk>
Message-ID: <3122018.iBNBjMKNbN@vostro.rjw.lan>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Friday, June 06, 2014 02:08:50 PM Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> --cU9XODsizZBnwgll
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> 
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 09:50:06PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 09:14:01PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> 
> > > I'm not sure about the expected merge order for this kind of change vs
> > > queued up stuff in the renesas git tree, but I believe the following
> > > patch selects ARCH_HAS_OPP:
> 
> > > [PATCH v3] ARM: shmobile: Mark all SoCs in shmobile as CPUFreq, capable
> 
> > I propose that we fix that up by adding an incremental patch to
> > mach-shmobile via my renesas tree once the dependency (assuming there is
> > one) is in Linus's tree.
> 
> Yes, the conversion to make ARCH_HAS_OPP unused is in Raphael's tree for
> the merge window.

Perhaps already merged?

Rafael