linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] driver core: Postpone DMA tear-down until after devres release
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 11:34:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <347cfec9-f7d4-2fbd-b88a-ee6f4dc25a25@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190207193653.18221-1-geert+renesas@glider.be>

On 07/02/2019 19:36, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> When unbinding the (IOMMU-enabled) R-Car SATA device on Salvator-XS
> (R-Car H3 ES2.0), in preparation of rebinding against vfio-platform for
> device pass-through for virtualization:
> 
>      echo ee300000.sata > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/sata_rcar/unbind
> 
> the kernel crashes with:
> 
>      Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffbf029ffffc
>      Mem abort info:
>        ESR = 0x96000006
>        Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
>        SET = 0, FnV = 0
>        EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
>      Data abort info:
>        ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000006
>        CM = 0, WnR = 0
>      swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 39-bit VAs, pgdp = 000000007e8c586c
>      [ffffffbf029ffffc] pgd=000000073bfc6003, pud=000000073bfc6003, pmd=0000000000000000
>      Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#1] SMP
>      Modules linked in:
>      CPU: 0 PID: 1098 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.0.0-rc5-salvator-x-00452-g37596f884f4318ef #287
>      Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X 2nd version board based on r8a7795 ES2.0+ (DT)
>      pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO)
>      pc : __free_pages+0x8/0x58
>      lr : __dma_direct_free_pages+0x50/0x5c
>      sp : ffffff801268baa0
>      x29: ffffff801268baa0 x28: 0000000000000000
>      x27: ffffffc6f9c60bf0 x26: ffffffc6f9c60bf0
>      x25: ffffffc6f9c60810 x24: 0000000000000000
>      x23: 00000000fffff000 x22: ffffff8012145000
>      x21: 0000000000000800 x20: ffffffbf029fffc8
>      x19: 0000000000000000 x18: ffffffc6f86c42c8
>      x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000070
>      x15: 0000000000000003 x14: 0000000000000000
>      x13: ffffff801103d7f8 x12: 0000000000000028
>      x11: ffffff8011117604 x10: 0000000000009ad8
>      x9 : ffffff80110126d0 x8 : ffffffc6f7563000
>      x7 : 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b x6 : 0000000000000018
>      x5 : ffffff8011cf3cc8 x4 : 0000000000004000
>      x3 : 0000000000080000 x2 : 0000000000000001
>      x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffffffbf029fffc8
>      Process bash (pid: 1098, stack limit = 0x00000000c38e3e32)
>      Call trace:
>       __free_pages+0x8/0x58
>       __dma_direct_free_pages+0x50/0x5c
>       arch_dma_free+0x1c/0x98
>       dma_direct_free+0x14/0x24
>       dma_free_attrs+0x9c/0xdc
>       dmam_release+0x18/0x20
>       release_nodes+0x25c/0x28c
>       devres_release_all+0x48/0x4c
>       device_release_driver_internal+0x184/0x1f0
>       device_release_driver+0x14/0x1c
>       unbind_store+0x70/0xb8
>       drv_attr_store+0x24/0x34
>       sysfs_kf_write+0x4c/0x64
>       kernfs_fop_write+0x154/0x1c4
>       __vfs_write+0x34/0x164
>       vfs_write+0xb4/0x16c
>       ksys_write+0x5c/0xbc
>       __arm64_sys_write+0x14/0x1c
>       el0_svc_common+0x98/0x114
>       el0_svc_handler+0x1c/0x24
>       el0_svc+0x8/0xc
>      Code: d51b4234 17fffffa a9bf7bfd 910003fd (b9403404)
>      ---[ end trace 8c564cdd3a1a840f ]---
> 
> While I've bisected this to commit e8e683ae9a736407 ("iommu/of: Fix
> probe-deferral"), and reverting that commit on post-v5.0-rc4 kernels
> does fix the problem, this turned out to be a red herring.
> 
> On arm64, arch_teardown_dma_ops() resets dev->dma_ops to NULL.
> Hence if a driver has used a managed DMA allocation API, the allocated
> DMA memory will be freed using the direct DMA ops, while it may have
> been allocated using a custom DMA ops (iommu_dma_ops in this case).
> 
> Fix this by reversing the order of the calls to devres_release_all() and
> arch_teardown_dma_ops().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> ---
> Question:
> Is this safe on arm32, which calls arm_teardown_iommu_dma_ops() instead
> of resetting dev->dma_ops?

Should be - the principle is the same, and even if it did break that 
would only be indicative of a separate bug being hidden by this one. 
This fix looks entirely valid and correct to me:

Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

> 
> ---
> Adding some debug code, and comparing before/after commit
> e8e683ae9a736407:
> 
>       sata_rcar ee300000.sata: of_iommu_configure:227: err = -517
>      -sata_rcar ee300000.sata: of_iommu_configure:230: calling iommu_probe_device()
>      -sata_rcar ee300000.sata: iommu_probe_device:122: Calling ipmmu_add_device
>      -sata_rcar ee300000.sata: ipmmu_add_device:893
>      -sata_rcar ee300000.sata: of_iommu_configure:232: iommu_probe_device() returned -19
>      -sata_rcar ee300000.sata: dma_alloc_attrs:257: size 2048, ops =           (null)
>      -sata_rcar ee300000.sata: __dma_direct_alloc_pages:104: size 4096
>      -sata_rcar ee300000.sata: __dma_direct_alloc_pages:115: trying dma_alloc_from_contiguous()
>      -sata_rcar ee300000.sata: dma_alloc_from_contiguous:202: cma_alloc(1) returned page ffffffbf00d20e00
>      -sata_rcar ee300000.sata: dma_alloc_attrs:271: allocated using dma_direct_alloc()
>      -sata_rcar ee300000.sata: dmam_alloc_attrs:98: size 2048 vaddr ffffff8011e95000 dma_handle 0x0x000000007c040000 attrs 0x0
>      -scsi host0: sata_rcar
>      -ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 irq 172
>      -ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> 
> DMA memory used to be allocated from CMA, dma_map_ops = NULL.
> The SATA driver was probed and initialized.
> 
>      +sata_rcar ee300000.sata: of_iommu_configure:234: skipping iommu_probe_device()
> 
> SATA driver initialization is now deferred.
> Later, it is retried:
> 
>      +sata_rcar ee300000.sata: of_iommu_configure:227: err = 0
>      +sata_rcar ee300000.sata: of_iommu_configure:230: calling iommu_probe_device()
>      +sata_rcar ee300000.sata: iommu_probe_device:122: Calling ipmmu_add_device
>      +sata_rcar ee300000.sata: ipmmu_add_device:893
>      +sata_rcar ee300000.sata: Using IPMMU context 1
>      +iommu: Adding device ee300000.sata to group 0
>      +sata_rcar ee300000.sata: ipmmu_add_device:908: Success
>      +sata_rcar ee300000.sata: of_iommu_configure:232: iommu_probe_device() returned 0
>      +sata_rcar ee300000.sata: dma_alloc_attrs:257: size 2048, ops = iommu_dma_ops
>      +sata_rcar ee300000.sata: dma_alloc_attrs:274: allocated using __iommu_alloc_attrs()
>      +sata_rcar ee300000.sata: dmam_alloc_attrs:98: size 2048 vaddr ffffff8012135000 dma_handle 0x0x00000000fffff000 attrs 0x0
>      +scsi host0: sata_rcar
>      +ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 irq 172
>      +ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> 
> DMA memory is now allocated using __iommu_alloc_attrs(), as dma_map_ops
> = iommu_dma_ops.
> 
> Unbind:
> 
>      -sata_rcar ee300000.sata: dmam_release:32: size 2048 vaddr ffffff8011e95000 dma_handle 0x0x000000007c040000 attrs 0x0
>      +sata_rcar ee300000.sata: dmam_release:32: size 2048 vaddr ffffff8012135000 dma_handle 0x0x00000000fffff000 attrs 0x0
>       sata_rcar ee300000.sata: dma_free_attrs:289: size 2048, ops =           (null)
> 
> dma_map_ops = NULL, both before/after!
> 
>       sata_rcar ee300000.sata: dma_free_attrs:308: calling dma_direct_free()
>      -sata_rcar ee300000.sata: __dma_direct_free_pages:189: size 2048 page ffffffbf00d20e00
>      -sata_rcar ee300000.sata: dma_release_from_contiguous:223: cma_release(1) freed
>      -sata_rcar ee300000.sata: __dma_direct_free_pages:194: skipping __free_pages()
> 
> DMA memory was correctly freed using CMA.
> 
>      +sata_rcar ee300000.sata: __dma_direct_free_pages:189: size 2048 page ffffffbf029fffc8
>      +sata_rcar ee300000.sata: dma_release_from_contiguous:225: cma_release(1) failed, cma area ffffff8011cf5530
>      +sata_rcar ee300000.sata: __dma_direct_free_pages:191: calling __free_pages()
>      +Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffbf029ffffc
> 
> Memory is incorrectly freed using the direct ops, as dma_map_ops = NULL.
> Oops...
> 
> After reversing the order of the calls to arch_teardown_dma_ops() and
> devres_release_all(), dma_map_ops is still valid, and the DMA memory is
> now released using __iommu_free_attrs():
> 
>      +sata_rcar ee300000.sata: dmam_release:32: size 2048 vaddr ffffff8012145000 dma_handle 0x0x00000000fffff000 attrs 0x0
>      +sata_rcar ee300000.sata: dma_free_attrs:289: size 2048, ops = iommu_dma_ops
>      +sata_rcar ee300000.sata: dma_free_attrs:311: calling __iommu_free_attrs()
> ---
>   drivers/base/dd.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> index 8ac10af17c0043a3..d62487d024559620 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> @@ -968,9 +968,9 @@ static void __device_release_driver(struct device *dev, struct device *parent)
>   			drv->remove(dev);
>   
>   		device_links_driver_cleanup(dev);
> -		arch_teardown_dma_ops(dev);
>   
>   		devres_release_all(dev);
> +		arch_teardown_dma_ops(dev);
>   		dev->driver = NULL;
>   		dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
>   		if (dev->pm_domain && dev->pm_domain->dismiss)
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-08 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-07 19:36 [PATCH/RFC] driver core: Postpone DMA tear-down until after devres release Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-02-08  7:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-08  9:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-08 11:34 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2019-02-08 16:40 ` Joerg Roedel
2019-02-08 17:55   ` Robin Murphy
2019-02-08 18:55     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-02-11 10:22       ` Robin Murphy
2019-03-07 14:45         ` John Garry
2019-03-07 14:52           ` Robin Murphy
2019-03-07 14:58             ` John Garry
2019-03-07 15:12             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-03-26 11:41 ` John Garry
2019-03-26 12:31   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-03-26 17:36     ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=347cfec9-f7d4-2fbd-b88a-ee6f4dc25a25@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).