From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:01:03 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm/arm64: replacing per-VM's per-CPU variable In-Reply-To: <1520974993-40423-1-git-send-email-peng.hao2@zte.com.cn> References: <1520974993-40423-1-git-send-email-peng.hao2@zte.com.cn> Message-ID: <37d19d6c-8787-d190-0ef0-c6709cb9e976@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org [You're repeatedly posting to the kvmarm mailing list without being subscribed to it. I've flushed the queue now, but please consider subscribing to the list, it will help everyone] On 13/03/18 21:03, Peng Hao wrote: > Using a global per-CPU variable instead of per-VM's per-CPU variable. > > Signed-off-by: Peng Hao > --- > arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 --- > virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 26 ++++++-------------------- > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h > index 248b930..4224f3b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h > @@ -59,9 +59,6 @@ struct kvm_arch { > /* VTTBR value associated with below pgd and vmid */ > u64 vttbr; > > - /* The last vcpu id that ran on each physical CPU */ > - int __percpu *last_vcpu_ran; > - > /* > * Anything that is not used directly from assembly code goes > * here. > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > index 596f8e4..5035a08 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > @@ -67,9 +67,6 @@ struct kvm_arch { > /* VTTBR value associated with above pgd and vmid */ > u64 vttbr; > > - /* The last vcpu id that ran on each physical CPU */ > - int __percpu *last_vcpu_ran; > - > /* The maximum number of vCPUs depends on the used GIC model */ > int max_vcpus; > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c > index 86941f6..a67ffb0 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c > @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ > /* Per-CPU variable containing the currently running vcpu. */ > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_vcpu *, kvm_arm_running_vcpu); > > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_vcpu *, kvm_last_ran_vcpu); > + > /* The VMID used in the VTTBR */ > static atomic64_t kvm_vmid_gen = ATOMIC64_INIT(1); > static u32 kvm_next_vmid; > @@ -115,18 +117,11 @@ void kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void *rtn) > */ > int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type) > { > - int ret, cpu; > + int ret; > > if (type) > return -EINVAL; > > - kvm->arch.last_vcpu_ran = alloc_percpu(typeof(*kvm->arch.last_vcpu_ran)); > - if (!kvm->arch.last_vcpu_ran) > - return -ENOMEM; > - > - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) > - *per_cpu_ptr(kvm->arch.last_vcpu_ran, cpu) = -1; > - > ret = kvm_alloc_stage2_pgd(kvm); > if (ret) > goto out_fail_alloc; > @@ -147,9 +142,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type) > return ret; > out_free_stage2_pgd: > kvm_free_stage2_pgd(kvm); > -out_fail_alloc: > - free_percpu(kvm->arch.last_vcpu_ran); > - kvm->arch.last_vcpu_ran = NULL; > +out_fail_alloc: > return ret; > } > > @@ -179,9 +172,6 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm) > > kvm_vgic_destroy(kvm); > > - free_percpu(kvm->arch.last_vcpu_ran); > - kvm->arch.last_vcpu_ran = NULL; > - > for (i = 0; i < KVM_MAX_VCPUS; ++i) { > if (kvm->vcpus[i]) { > kvm_arch_vcpu_free(kvm->vcpus[i]); > @@ -343,17 +333,13 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) > { > - int *last_ran; > - > - last_ran = this_cpu_ptr(vcpu->kvm->arch.last_vcpu_ran); > - > /* > * We might get preempted before the vCPU actually runs, but > * over-invalidation doesn't affect correctness. > */ > - if (*last_ran != vcpu->vcpu_id) { > + if (per_cpu(kvm_last_ran_vcpu, cpu) != vcpu) { > kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid, vcpu); > - *last_ran = vcpu->vcpu_id; > + per_cpu(kvm_last_ran_vcpu, cpu) = vcpu; > } > > vcpu->cpu = cpu; > Have you read and understood what this code is about? The whole point of this code is to track physical CPUs on a per-VM basis. Making it global completely defeats the point, and can result in guest memory corruption. Please see commit 94d0e5980d67. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...