linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, michel@lespinasse.org,
	jglisse@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, mgorman@suse.de, dave@stgolabs.net,
	willy@infradead.org, liam.howlett@oracle.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, laurent.dufour@fr.ibm.com,
	paulmck@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, songliubraving@fb.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
	hughd@google.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
	kent.overstreet@linux.dev, rientjes@google.com,
	axelrasmussen@google.com, joelaf@google.com, minchan@google.com,
	kernel-team@android.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH RESEND 10/28] mm/mmap: mark VMAs as locked in vma_adjust
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 17:52:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3faf8347-5062-4d8d-0360-c23ac5c525b3@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpFm8irJyhzn-22QR+_4BmU+yDZM97T4S8pPKotxZUmjBg@mail.gmail.com>

Le 09/09/2022 à 02:51, Suren Baghdasaryan a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 8:35 AM Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Le 01/09/2022 à 19:34, Suren Baghdasaryan a écrit :
>>> vma_adjust modifies a VMA and possibly its neighbors. Mark them as locked
>>> before making the modifications.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
>>> ---
>>>  mm/mmap.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
>>> index f89c9b058105..ed58cf0689b2 100644
>>> --- a/mm/mmap.c
>>> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
>>> @@ -710,6 +710,10 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>>>       long adjust_next = 0;
>>>       int remove_next = 0;
>>>
>>> +     vma_mark_locked(vma);
>>> +     if (next)
>>> +             vma_mark_locked(next);
>>> +
>>
>> I was wondering if the VMAs insert and expand should be locked too.
>>
>> For expand, I can't see any valid reason, but for insert, I'm puzzled.
>> I would think that it is better to lock the VMA to be inserted but I can't
>> really justify that.
>>
>> It may be nice to detail why this is not need to lock insert and expand here.
> 
> 'expand' is always locked before it's passed to __vma_adjust() by
> vma_merge(). It has to be locked before we decide "Can it merge with
> the predecessor?" here
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/mm/mmap.c#L1201 because
> a change in VMA can affect that decision. I spent many hours tracking
> the issue caused by not locking the VMA before making this decision.
> It might be good to add a comment about this...
> 
> AFAIKT 'insert' is only used by __split_vma() and it's always a brand
> new VMA which is not yet linked into mm->mmap. Any reason
> __vma_adjust() should lock it?

No, I think that's good this way.

> 
>>
>>>       if (next && !insert) {
>>>               struct vm_area_struct *exporter = NULL, *importer = NULL;
>>>
>>> @@ -754,8 +758,11 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>>>                        * If next doesn't have anon_vma, import from vma after
>>>                        * next, if the vma overlaps with it.
>>>                        */
>>> -                     if (remove_next == 2 && !next->anon_vma)
>>> +                     if (remove_next == 2 && !next->anon_vma) {
>>>                               exporter = next->vm_next;
>>> +                             if (exporter)
>>> +                                     vma_mark_locked(exporter);
>>> +                     }
>>>
>>>               } else if (end > next->vm_start) {
>>>                       /*
>>> @@ -931,6 +938,8 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>>>                        * "vma->vm_next" gap must be updated.
>>>                        */
>>>                       next = vma->vm_next;
>>> +                     if (next)
>>> +                             vma_mark_locked(next);
>>>               } else {
>>>                       /*
>>>                        * For the scope of the comment "next" and
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@android.com.
>>


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-09 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-01 17:34 [RFC PATCH RESEND 00/28] per-VMA locks proposal Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 01/28] mm: introduce CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 02/28] mm: rcu safe VMA freeing Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 03/28] mm: introduce __find_vma to be used without mmap_lock protection Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 20:22   ` Kent Overstreet
2022-09-01 23:18     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 04/28] mm: move mmap_lock assert function definitions Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 20:24   ` Kent Overstreet
2022-09-01 20:51     ` Liam Howlett
2022-09-01 23:21       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-02  6:23     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-09-02 17:46       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 05/28] mm: add per-VMA lock and helper functions to control it Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 13:46   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-06 17:24     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 06/28] mm: mark VMA as locked whenever vma->vm_flags are modified Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 14:26   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-06 19:00     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 20:00       ` Liam Howlett
2022-09-06 20:13         ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 07/28] kernel/fork: mark VMAs as locked before copying pages during fork Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 14:37   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-08 23:57     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 13:27       ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09 16:29         ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 08/28] mm/khugepaged: mark VMA as locked while collapsing a hugepage Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 14:43   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09  0:15     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 09/28] mm/mempolicy: mark VMA as locked when changing protection policy Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 14:47   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09  0:27     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 10/28] mm/mmap: mark VMAs as locked in vma_adjust Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 15:35   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09  0:51     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 15:52       ` Laurent Dufour [this message]
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 11/28] mm/mmap: mark VMAs as locked before merging or splitting them Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 15:44   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 12/28] mm/mremap: mark VMA as locked while remapping it to a new address range Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 16:09   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 13/28] mm: conditionally mark VMA as locked in free_pgtables and unmap_page_range Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 10:33   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09 16:43     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 14/28] mm: mark VMAs as locked before isolating them Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 13:35   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09 16:28     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 15/28] mm/mmap: mark adjacent VMAs as locked if they can grow into unmapped area Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 13:43   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09 16:25     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 16/28] kernel/fork: assert no VMA readers during its destruction Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 13:56   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09 16:19     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 17/28] mm/mmap: prevent pagefault handler from racing with mmu_notifier registration Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 14:20   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09 16:12     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 18/28] mm: add FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK flag Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 14:26   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 19/28] mm: disallow do_swap_page to handle page faults under VMA lock Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 19:39   ` Peter Xu
2022-09-06 20:08     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 20:22       ` Peter Xu
2022-09-07  0:58         ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 14:26   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 20/28] mm: introduce per-VMA lock statistics Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 14:28   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09 16:11     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 21/28] mm: introduce find_and_lock_anon_vma to be used from arch-specific code Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 14:38   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09 16:10     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 22/28] x86/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 23/28] x86/mm: define ARCH_SUPPORTS_PER_VMA_LOCK Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 20:20   ` Kent Overstreet
2022-09-01 23:17     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 24/28] arm64/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 25/28] arm64/mm: define ARCH_SUPPORTS_PER_VMA_LOCK Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 26/28] powerc/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 27/28] powerpc/mm: define ARCH_SUPPORTS_PER_VMA_LOCK Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 28/28] kernel/fork: throttle call_rcu() calls in vm_area_free Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 15:19   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09 16:02     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 16:14       ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-01 20:58 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 00/28] per-VMA locks proposal Kent Overstreet
2022-09-01 23:26   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-11  9:35     ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-28  2:28       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-29 11:18         ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-02  7:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-02 14:45   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-05 12:32 ` Michal Hocko
2022-09-05 18:32   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-05 20:35     ` Kent Overstreet
2022-09-06 15:46       ` Suren Baghdasaryan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3faf8347-5062-4d8d-0360-c23ac5c525b3@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jglisse@google.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=laurent.dufour@fr.ibm.com \
    --cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=michel@lespinasse.org \
    --cc=minchan@google.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).