From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C548C31E44 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:40:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D31522082C for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:40:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="MBgCAm2I" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D31522082C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=R7/O1UzHk1+MEQuQWg+rXagPYr3PXbf9TfSeZMHGOuI=; b=MBgCAm2IawG67q ZHSIrgKpHr2WVsDLiq8q9NFwZm2EkMFllsVDTwk/G1UMBA+inw66COfb0uRTQOQXM/A6AwawHUzBr koG73SPxYXOxF6e5gDsuheKnN1OY5bKpa3gbeV+6h9cklhodfigW2jhaIWdXhrm05xh1pmmK5ouYe ofZ9CbhEOffYVd+7nIE4hMIFO1cgF+1ZkE4GeRKHzuP2FcG0theGSTImoh6r53tT0NnxzlwF1ksmh QwvPqA3JBKk6xl6CSPD7M9PjEJMevLLJNCT9ipL3xAfXYlbEdqOb4GYpPDzzy1FBGmvjhmUEJzS/m huyLIxLV7M2rqDL8Y5Uw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hbigo-0001pj-Ta; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:40:06 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hbigj-0001Uf-42; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:40:02 +0000 Received: from we0305.dip.tu-dresden.de ([141.76.177.49] helo=phil.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hbige-0004BS-1j; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:39:56 +0200 From: Heiko Stuebner To: Peter Geis Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: improve rk3328-roc-cc rgmii performance. Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:39:55 +0200 Message-ID: <4025583.lUYsg5j2zl@phil> In-Reply-To: References: <20190607123731.8737-1-pgwipeout@gmail.com> <1559912295.22520.0@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190614_024001_315157_EE60CDB6 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.16 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jose Abreu , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Robin Murphy , "Leonidas P. Papadakos" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Am Samstag, 8. Juni 2019, 01:07:48 CEST schrieb Peter Geis: > On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 8:58 AM Leonidas P. Papadakos > wrote: > > > > > > I'll test on my board, but if in the end it does end up being a change > > to both tx and rxpbl then we can replce the 2 tx/rxpbl options with > > one, as far as I know: > > > > snps,pbl = <0x4>; > > > > > > The big change was actually snps,aal. > As per the TRM, DMA channels not address aligned have severe > limitations, if they work at all. > > Setting the DMA ops as address aligned fixed my 30mbps TX issue when > combined with your snps,txpbl = <0x4>. same as with the other patch: I've lost track of what matters, so please resend the ones that matter with appropriate Tested-by, Reviewed-by tags by involved people. Thanks Heiko _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel