From: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com (Shawn Lin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 1/3] DT: bindings: mmc: Add property for 3.3V only support
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 08:48:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <468a6704-a9f0-1715-ff64-9e331a6a80b1@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqJ09hXYrp_pgAw9FXrBv+=grkm_zip6qB9XefujPECTxQ@mail.gmail.com>
+ Adrian
Let's queue Adrian here who now maintains SDHCI stuff.
On 2016/8/11 5:39, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> hat am 10. August 2016 um 20:44 geschrieben:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 12:55:38PM +0000, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>>>> Currently there is no proper way to define that a MMC host supports
>>>> only 3.3V. The property no-1-8-v is broken and has different meanings
>>>> for different sdhci variants. So add a new property for 3.3V only
>>>> support and mark no-1-8-v as deprecated.
>>>
>>> Why is it broken?
>>
>> i want to quote Ulf Hansson here [1]:
>>
>> The problem with the "no-1-8-v" binding is that it's describing what
>> the hardware *can't* do. It thus becomes easy to abuse it.
>
> Sounds like a quirk which is perfectly normal for a property. I'd
> agree it should be what the h/w *can* do if h/w didn't have capability
> bit that does that.
>
>> I suggest we stop using it, we should mark it deprecated.
>>
>> [1] - http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg34604.html
>>
>>> How would I override a controller saying 1.8V is
>>> supported and it is not?
>>
>> Sorry, i'm not sure that i understand your question. In case a board or a MMC
>> controller doesn't support 1.8V, it usually supports only 3.3V which is the
>> intension of this patch.
>
> Some controllers have capability bits saying what voltages they
> support, right? And those bits can be wrong (unless firmware sets them
> I'd expect that is the common case) which as I read it is what
> "no-1-8-v" was for. So with the "mmc-ddr-*v" properties, what does not
> present mean and how do they relate to controller capability bits? I
> assume they would override the controller bits, but you can only
> override the capability bit not set case. I would think the property
> not present means use the capability bit, not that that voltage is not
> supported. I think you probably need tri-state properties here where
> value 1 means supported, 0 means not supported, and not present means
> use capability bit (or other method).
>
> Rob
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-11 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-06 12:55 [PATCH RFC 0/3] mmc: mxs-mmc: Implement DDR support Stefan Wahren
2016-08-06 12:55 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] DT: bindings: mmc: Add property for 3.3V only support Stefan Wahren
2016-08-10 18:44 ` Rob Herring
2016-08-10 20:27 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-08-10 21:39 ` Rob Herring
2016-08-11 0:48 ` Shawn Lin [this message]
2016-08-18 12:25 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-08-30 9:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-09-02 18:50 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-09-08 16:44 ` Rob Herring
2016-08-06 12:55 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] mmc: core: add new cap for 3.3V only DDR MMCs Stefan Wahren
2016-08-06 13:14 ` Marek Vasut
2016-08-06 14:18 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-08-06 14:42 ` Marek Vasut
2016-08-07 2:07 ` Shawn Lin
2016-08-07 8:09 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-08-11 11:12 ` Jaehoon Chung
2016-08-11 11:57 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-08-06 12:55 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] mmc: mxs-mmc: Implement DDR support Stefan Wahren
2016-08-06 13:13 ` Marek Vasut
2016-08-06 14:08 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-08-06 13:10 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] " Marek Vasut
2016-08-06 13:48 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-08-07 11:37 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-08-27 19:15 ` Stefan Wahren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=468a6704-a9f0-1715-ff64-9e331a6a80b1@rock-chips.com \
--to=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).